Instigator / Con
5
1616
rating
32
debates
62.5%
won
Topic
#960

Black Lives Matter

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Better arguments
0
15
Better sources
2
10
Better legibility
2
4
Better conduct
1
4

After 5 votes and with 28 points ahead, the winner is...

oromagi
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
4
Time for argument
Two days
Max argument characters
30,000
Voting period
One week
Point system
Multiple criterions
Voting system
Open
Contender / Pro
33
1922
rating
117
debates
97.44%
won
Description

Hello, this debate is going to discuss Black Lives Matter and whether it is beneficial to society and black people.

Black Lives Matter-a group that claims that Police Brutality is against blacks and that society oppress blacks a lot.

beneficial- or advantageous; resulting in good.

Good luck to my opponent.

Criterion
Con
Tie
Pro
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

pro was a tryhard

Criterion
Con
Tie
Pro
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Concession

Criterion
Con
Tie
Pro
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

C R3

Criterion
Con
Tie
Pro
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Normally I give conduct for concessions, but conceding while trying to insult someone for being better at the shared hobby makes no sense. If smarter people routinely disagree, maybe there's some truth to what they say.

Criterion
Con
Tie
Pro
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

" I concede because you are a fucking tryhard who sweats his ass off while debating. You are 15-0 for a reason. Calm down. Why would you accept this debate just to massacre me. You are now longer allowed to my debates. Have a good day AND PEACE"

- Very poor debate conduct by Con, he pretty much conceded the entire debate and insulted Pro at the same time.

At least if you're going to admit defeat, do it nicely and politely.

Also, I might add that Dr.Franklin clearly demonstrated he was a coward who ran away due to Pro clearly outsmarting him.

Dr.Franklin is banning pro from ever participating on their debates again for a VERY poor reason, not because pro demonstrates poor conduct, not because Dr.Franklin doesn't want to waste his time if pro was too ignorant, and not even because of pro ff every single round constantly.

It's because Pro outsmarted him...

Very poor debate conduct on Dr. Franklin's part and very poor reasoning in general.

There're reasons to ban people from participating in your debates, heck I recently just banned Tiwaz.

However, banning someone simply because they're " massacuring " you is just a coward move.