Instigator / Pro
13
1495
rating
6
debates
33.33%
won
Topic
#964

Islam does not protect free speech and expression

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Better arguments
3
18
Better sources
6
12
Better legibility
3
6
Better conduct
1
6

After 6 votes and with 29 points ahead, the winner is...

oromagi
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
5
Time for argument
Three days
Max argument characters
30,000
Voting period
One week
Point system
Multiple criterions
Voting system
Open
Contender / Con
42
1922
rating
117
debates
97.44%
won
Description

No information

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

A nigh full forfeit because pro said something the first round.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Plagiarism, full forfeit.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Plagiarism, and forfeits are clearly unfair, and warrant conduct penalty.

For argument - plagiarized arguments cannot be counted as valid aruguments, and as a result, pro did not offer a single valid argument and thus fails to meet his burden of prooxZ by default this means con gets argument points too.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Plagiarism and FF

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

I'd like to thank both opponents for this debate

PLAGIARISM

Pro plagiarised a part of their argument, that's poor conduct!

Moving right along,

POOR CONDUCT

Pro FF the majority of the rounds, that's poor conduct!

This prime example of poor conduct as exhibited by pro has destroyed any chance of a coherent debate!

Because of this I must award Con convincing arguments and conduct since they didn't forfeit the majority of the rounds and didn't plagiarise.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Full forfeit and plagiarism.