Philosophy debates
We will be arguing about if our God is internal or external.
’If’ is not utilitarian because it only acknowledges what is currently not true.
If there are any parameters on the debate you'd like to change before accepting this debate (character count, number of rounds, etc.) just tell me.
Does a good, perfect person struggle with evil? I will define "perfection" within the scope of this debate. It is: living a perfect life is living a life without error of any kind under any circumstance. It is always making correct choices when faced with every circumstance. Impossible to achieve? Probably. But, if even a perfect person by this definition still struggles with evil, is there any doubt that the rest of us do?
For Oromagi
Hello everyone! I have heard and seen a nonstop flow of political rhetoric from both main U.S parties (Democratic and Republican). Anyhow, I wish to delve into and hopefully debunk what I find to be bad ideas from both sides of the aisle. In this second installment (see the border wall debate) I wish to switch party lines and take on federal government benefits (including health care and welfare) that many mainstream Democrats defend.
"IF" is the most useless word in any language because it acknowledges only that which is currently not true.
Hello everyone! Today I would like to make the case for classical Theism, that is the case for God. This question has been debated throughout all of history and so it is quite an honor to continue this great conversation and build upon it in the present day. DO NOT join if you have an agnostic view of God/do not have evidence for the position that God does not exist. To Truth! -logicae
Hello everyone! Today I would like to make the case for classical Theism, that is the case for God. This question has been debated throughout all of history and so it is quite an honor to continue this great conversation and build upon it in the present day. DO NOT join if you have an agnostic view of God/do not have evidence for the position that God does not exist. I have done these debates on debate.org, but It seems that site is plagued by trolls lately. To Truth! -logicae
This is meant to serve as a short demo debate so I can assess the potential of a full debate later on.
Imagine that you go to vote and some, jerk stops you and says, hey you aren't voting right go home, like a bogus literacy test, what sort of f*&cking retard violates basic human rights by telling people how they can vote?
Hello everyone! I have heard and seen a nonstop flow of political rhetoric from both main u.s parties (democratic and republican). Anyhow, I wish to delve into and hopefully debunk what I find to be bad ideas from both sides of the aisle. Anyone who has strong opinions on the matter is welcome to join, just be sure to have well developed arguments to assist your side (In other words don't be like most American voters ;).
We must consider the fact that the universe is a simulation, and if it is a simulation, in my opinion it is better to have significant influence on society than it is to be a "good person". It would be better to be a serial killer who becomes famous than a person who regularly attends church, donates large amounts of money to charity and is loved by everyone around her.
I will be arguing pro hedonism. You will be arguing con hedonism by showing an alternative philosophy to be better.