27 days later
19 days later
325 days later
He is a very powerful persuader who actually comes up with arguments of his own accord and assimilation of facts.
This both makes him a good liar and a good spreader of truth, that part is up to him.
but I try and spread ideas that I think are good.
Like how to eliminate the debt
punish murderers and rapists in a utilitarian way that saves more people than UHC.
Hasn't literally everyone on this site disagreed with you on your way of removing the debt?
Do you have an example?
Not true. Someone called it genius.
Make them give blood every 2 months to save about as many people as UHC would without modifying the economy.
Who?
How many politicians are support this?
I'm guessing you have no source to provide this or your saying since giving blood save lives the other lives don't matter because of utilitarianism
not to mention you are reducing the value of a human life making dependent on how many are alike that person
The Dynamic Squid.
I think every politician who supports the death penalty right now, once they hear this idea, they would support this idea instead.
The only life that we would be infringing upon are the lives of rapists and murderers, and it's not much either; they just give blood every 2 months in addition to life in jail.
Can you rephrase this part since it doesn't make sense?
I guess the problem I have with this is that what if later on we found out they were innocent but I'm sure the blood donation is not going to kill the person.
but I'm sure the blood donation is not going to kill the person.
Another problem I found is that giving a certain date instead of whenever people need blood limits its effectiveness.
You've neglected to mention in your last response that this would be a sort of filling a gap in universal healthcare but it won't.
Scrap the value of the human life part I was talking about. I didn't know you were talking about people who were sentenced for life in prison.
If they are innocent, they get freed and paid for the blood we took from them thinking they were guilty. I'd say $100/day in jail and $2000/pint of blood is a fair reward for the falsely accused once they are proven innocent.
Blood donation doesn't kill you.
My plan is the prisons generate the blood and sell it to whichever hospital needs the blood. If a hospital needs the blood, they contact a prison so the prison can sell them the blood. Blood can be stored for quite some time, although I forgot how long.
It would save a comparable amount of lives to UHC, but they would be different people's lives. Still, 60,000 lives saved per year by forcing bad felons to give blood every 2 months. If you need blood to survive in the US, your basically saved under this model.
