Liberals are stupid

Author: Dr.Franklin

Posts

Total: 237
Dr.Franklin
Dr.Franklin's avatar
Debates: 32
Posts: 10,555
4
7
11
Dr.Franklin's avatar
Dr.Franklin
4
7
11
Libtard: BUT BUT banning abortions doesn't stop them

OK, so what about banning guns

Libtard:Men cant make laws about Women

Ok so, non-gun owners CANT make laws about gun owners
Alec
Alec's avatar
Debates: 42
Posts: 2,472
5
7
11
Alec's avatar
Alec
5
7
11
-->
@Dr.Franklin
Out of curiosity, how would you respond to the claim that if a woman doesn't get an abortion and sets the kid up for adoption, that the kid would get messed up?  I have an answer, but I'm curious as to what you would say.
Dr.Franklin
Dr.Franklin's avatar
Debates: 32
Posts: 10,555
4
7
11
Dr.Franklin's avatar
Dr.Franklin
4
7
11
-->
@TheRealNihilist
Better than dead, plus fix the adoption system
TheRealNihilist
TheRealNihilist's avatar
Debates: 44
Posts: 4,920
4
9
11
TheRealNihilist's avatar
TheRealNihilist
4
9
11
-->
@Dr.Franklin
Better than dead, plus fix the adoption system
Why @ me with this? 

Dr.Franklin
Dr.Franklin's avatar
Debates: 32
Posts: 10,555
4
7
11
Dr.Franklin's avatar
Dr.Franklin
4
7
11
-->
@TheRealNihilist
ooooooopss,my bad meant to tag alec
Dr.Franklin
Dr.Franklin's avatar
Debates: 32
Posts: 10,555
4
7
11
Dr.Franklin's avatar
Dr.Franklin
4
7
11
-->
@Alec
Post is above
Alec
Alec's avatar
Debates: 42
Posts: 2,472
5
7
11
Alec's avatar
Alec
5
7
11
-->
@Dr.Franklin
Do the kids even get messed up though?  According to http://www.adopt.org/adoption-statistics, it states that over 94% of kids who
 get set up for adoption get adopted within 4 years.  Not only that, but since adoption costs a lot of money, this may sound like a negative but in reality, it means that only rich people are adopting.

Dr.Franklin
Dr.Franklin's avatar
Debates: 32
Posts: 10,555
4
7
11
Dr.Franklin's avatar
Dr.Franklin
4
7
11
-->
@Alec
nice, destroyer them leftist plebs
Alec
Alec's avatar
Debates: 42
Posts: 2,472
5
7
11
Alec's avatar
Alec
5
7
11
-->
@Dr.Franklin
I think that since it was technology that ended slavery, it will be technology that ends abortion.  Once artificial wombs exist that are good, the whole "Women's right to choose" BS becomes obsolete.
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 22,543
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@Alec
We can already end pregnancies without killing the fetus. Women just don't want that choice.
dustryder
dustryder's avatar
Debates: 5
Posts: 1,080
3
2
4
dustryder's avatar
dustryder
3
2
4
Lmao I know right?

They even want to damage America's economy by restricting carbon emissions in order to appease corporate bought and paid for climate "scientist" shills, but they are all for cars and eating meat which are all heavy contributors to carbon emissions. What fucking hypocrites. 

I swear libcucks just want to burn America to the ground
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 22,543
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@dustryder
libcucks just want money for their retirement like every politician in DC.

The political value of regulations isn't in appeasing the voters...it's the lucrative selling of environmental exemptions to corporate lobbyists. It's a huge business, government in the age of crony capitalism, with near zero accountability from deluded partisan supporters.

Just like when the top tax bracket rate was 90%...the amount of money funneled from rich people to DC to purchase exemptions that ensured rich people never actually paid more than 25% was staggering. Corruption is the new norm.
Ramshutu
Ramshutu's avatar
Debates: 43
Posts: 2,768
6
9
10
Ramshutu's avatar
Ramshutu
6
9
10
-->
@Dr.Franklin
Like so many other conservatives, you’re boiling down the opposing argument go a ridiculous caricature straw man that bears no resemblance to any of the arguments that are really used.

Lets cover some of this horrific misrepresentation from the beginning.

The main argument to support abortion is that people have the right to do what they want with their body. I can’t order you to do something with your body you don’t want to do just because it will save someone’s life. It’s a key aspect of personal liberty. 

It is true that given the severe impact of having a child, helped in no part by conservatives refusal to provide assistance with healthcare, child care, sex education, free access to contraception, paid parental leave; mean that women are likely to seek out unsafe abortions that our their life at risks. 

This differs in several key ways from obtaining a gun illegally.

- Firstly, an abortion is not a physical object that must be manufactured and traded.
- an abortion cannot be stolen from another individual.
- Police officers can not remove your abortion and take it off the street.
- Buy back policies do not allow women to return their abortions.
- You do not have to have an abortion about your person for it to be a crime.

Moving swiftly on: almost no one is calling for a “ban on guns”, this is just part of a foaming at the mouth insanity drive by the right wing media. What is being proposed are a series of measures aimed at reducing gun violence by making it more difficult for some weapons and some weapon types to be purchased, and by whom.

So please; memes should be used for cats, mocking hipsters, and complaining about life; conservatives should avoid trying to make political points with such approaches as youre generally terrible at it.


Snoopy
Snoopy's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 1,320
2
2
4
Snoopy's avatar
Snoopy
2
2
4
-->
@Dr.Franklin
You can keep your identity politics, and I'll keep my hardware.
Dr.Franklin
Dr.Franklin's avatar
Debates: 32
Posts: 10,555
4
7
11
Dr.Franklin's avatar
Dr.Franklin
4
7
11
-->
@Snoopy
ok 
Dr.Franklin
Dr.Franklin's avatar
Debates: 32
Posts: 10,555
4
7
11
Dr.Franklin's avatar
Dr.Franklin
4
7
11
-->
@Ramshutu
Its a joke pointing fun at NPC's. Take it lightly sir.
Mopac
Mopac's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 8,050
3
4
7
Mopac's avatar
Mopac
3
4
7
A generations long process of indoctrinating the youth into socialist ideals makes it a lot easier. I wouldn't call "liberals" stupid, I would say they are deceived. The ones deceiving them are very organized and clever. 

I don't think most "liberals" are aware of the fact that the people they are rooting for are working towards taking over the country. These people are not really on our side.





disgusted
disgusted's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,959
2
3
3
disgusted's avatar
disgusted
2
3
3
-->
@Mopac
Do you want some paranoia with your paranoia. Conservitards rule? bwuahahahaha
One of your gods preached socialist ideas.
Mopac
Mopac's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 8,050
3
4
7
Mopac's avatar
Mopac
3
4
7
-->
@disgusted
Forcing other people to share does nothing for their heart.

disgusted
disgusted's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,959
2
3
3
disgusted's avatar
disgusted
2
3
3
-->
@Mopac
That's not what one of your gods preached. So you are preaching a heresy concerning one of your gods, in fact perhaps the greatest heresy concerning that god.
Mopac
Mopac's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 8,050
3
4
7
Mopac's avatar
Mopac
3
4
7
-->
@disgusted
Robbing people who have more than you because you covet their wealth is not ethically consistent with my faith.
disgusted
disgusted's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,959
2
3
3
disgusted's avatar
disgusted
2
3
3
-->
@Mopac
You've gone down that dead end again. I'm discussing the socialist ideals preached by one of your gods, do try to keep with the conversation and refrain from including your disgusting fantasies in that discussion.
Talk about the socialist ideals of one of your gods.
Mopac
Mopac's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 8,050
3
4
7
Mopac's avatar
Mopac
3
4
7
-->
@disgusted
I don't know about any gods, but here is a parable of Jesus...



"For the kingdom of heaven is as a man travelling into a far country, who called his own servants, and delivered unto them his goods.
And unto one he gave five talents, to another two, and to another one; to every man according to his several ability; and straightway took his journey.
Then he that had received the five talents went and traded with the same, and made them other five talents.
And likewise he that had received two, he also gained other two.
But he that had received one went and digged in the earth, and hid his lord's money.
After a long time the lord of those servants cometh, and reckoneth with them.

And so he that had received five talents came and brought other five talents, saying, Lord, thou deliveredst unto me five talents: behold, I have gained beside them five talents more.
His lord said unto him, Well done, thou good and faithful servant: thou hast been faithful over a few things, I will make thee ruler over many things: enter thou into the joy of thy lord.
He also that had received two talents came and said, Lord, thou deliveredst unto me two talents: behold, I have gained two other talents beside them.
His lord said unto him, Well done, good and faithful servant; thou hast been faithful over a few things, I will make thee ruler over many things: enter thou into the joy of thy lord.

Then he which had received the one talent came and said, Lord, I knew thee that thou art an hard man, reaping where thou hast not sown, and gathering where thou hast not strawed:
And I was afraid, and went and hid thy talent in the earth: lo, there thou hast that is thine.

His lord answered and said unto him, Thou wicked and slothful servant, thou knewest that I reap where I sowed not, and gather where I have not strawed:
Thou oughtest therefore to have put my money to the exchangers, and then at my coming I should have received mine own with usury.
Take therefore the talent from him, and give it unto him which hath ten talents.

For unto every one that hath shall be given, and he shall have abundance: but from him that hath not shall be taken away even that which he hath.
And cast ye the unprofitable servant into outer darkness: there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth."


Outplayz
Outplayz's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 2,193
3
3
5
Outplayz's avatar
Outplayz
3
3
5
-->
@Dr.Franklin
OK, so what about banning guns
Most people barking to ban guns are ignorant... and if any liberal buys into that i simply disagree with them. I however share in there sentiment that guns should be well regulated, and so does the constitution. Meaning, making sure stupid people and criminals don't get their hands on guns. Enforcing the laws we have already is a good starting point. 

 BUT BUT banning abortions doesn't stop them
In your attempt to make fun of liberals you are proving a point. Yes. Just like guns, banning abortions won't stop abortions. Furthermore, banning abortions will force kids to be born to people that don't want them. This can lead to death of the mother and possibly pain to the unborn child bc of self administered abortions, backyard abortions, a black market, kids growing up in families that can't take care of them, kids growing up to parents that didn't want them and don't care about the kid which can also lead to abuse of the child (sexually / physically), etc...

There is nothing good about banning abortions, just as there is nothing good about banning guns. Both would result in a net negative. So guess what... libtards are just as dumb as Trumptards... the world is fcked. 
Mopac
Mopac's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 8,050
3
4
7
Mopac's avatar
Mopac
3
4
7
-->
@Outplayz
Sexual immorality leads too unwanted children.

Abortion is child sacrifice, it is an abomination.

Outplayz
Outplayz's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 2,193
3
3
5
Outplayz's avatar
Outplayz
3
3
5
-->
@Mopac
Sexual immorality leads too unwanted children.
This doesn't make sense bc it's too general. Plus, the only immoral sex is that which falls under imprisonment of another human being. I don't share your definition of "sexual immorality" if it comes from flawed religion.  

Abortion is child sacrifice, it is an abomination.
Define words. It's fetus sacrifice... sure. I disagree with late term unless only harm to child or mother. Overall, i think it's a lesser evil to keep abortion than allowing a conscious human being suffer a life of pain. If you want to force people... you are forcing more evil into this world. You have the evil position if you want it banned for the reasons i listed above. Banning it only comes with more pain and suffering. 
Mopac
Mopac's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 8,050
3
4
7
Mopac's avatar
Mopac
3
4
7
-->
@Outplayz
Your idea of what is sexually moral leads to unwanted pregnancy and abortion.

Keep telling yourself this is moral.

I think you are blind to the obvious.






Outplayz
Outplayz's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 2,193
3
3
5
Outplayz's avatar
Outplayz
3
3
5
-->
@Mopac
Your idea of what is sexually moral leads to unwanted pregnancy and abortion.
It's stupid people that leads to unwanted pregnancy and many other situations. This could be married or unmarried people.

Keep telling yourself this is moral.
I do not believe in one partner, i do not believe in marriage... keep continuing to call my existence immoral, and i'll continue to view you as trash and insignificant in that regard. Like i said, you're destroying your own church with your intolerance and evil.    

I think you are blind to the obvious.
Projection. 
Alec
Alec's avatar
Debates: 42
Posts: 2,472
5
7
11
Alec's avatar
Alec
5
7
11
-->
@Outplayz
Meaning, making sure stupid people and criminals don't get their hands on guns.
Against the 2nd amendment.  That has to be modified before you can legally do that.

Furthermore, banning abortions will force kids to be born to people that don't want them.
And then those parents can set the kids up for adoption.

This can lead to death of the mother and possibly pain to the unborn child bc of self administered abortions, backyard abortions, a black market
It almost never leads to the death of the mother.  She can simply not have an abortion if she thinks it will kill her.  Also, back alley abortions are less common then safe abortions because when anything is banned, it becomes less common then when it's not banned.  Otherwise, by that same logic, we ought to legalize murder, rape, and kidnapping because if these practices are banned, then people will do it illegally.  A good way to reduce their presence in American society is to punish the people that do them.  Now I'm willing to compromise with the left on this.  Rather then treating abortion just like murder on the punishment scale, a woman who has had an abortion could be forced to go to a pro life camp, where they make the women pro life (this is easy since the Right has the moral and logical high ground, all the left has are feelings and "facts" that just aren't accurate or misleading) and then from there, the women that have had abortions convince other people that abortion is wrong and ought to be punishable similar to how Steven Crowder does it.  An eye for an eye, you take a life, you save a life, even if it's someone else's future kid.  Given that about 1/6 women have abortions in their life (since some women have multiple abortions, like Hillary Clinton(https://www.lifenews.com/2016/03/29/woman-who-had-affair-with-bill-clinton-claims-hillary-clinton-had-several-abortions/)), they merely have to convince more people that abortion ought to become an illegal practice once it becomes banned.  
Mopac
Mopac's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 8,050
3
4
7
Mopac's avatar
Mopac
3
4
7
-->
@Outplayz


The indignant wailings of an invalid carry no weight. The truth is what carries weight. The truth is that your idollatry has blinded you to what is obviously immoral.

Very selfish. Very arbitrary.