Mandatory vasectomies worldwide.

Topic's posts

Posts in total: 96

--> @ethang5
What would have been a really stupid guess? That he would believe that  Bmdrocks21 agrees with him? Or that  Bmdrocks21 agrees with him?

The second, though the first is plausible. The first interpretation didn't even cross my mind when reading your post. Which of these more closely matches your intended meaning?

And either way, why?

Bmd is a sane person. Randomly invading countries has been out of fashion for sane people for quite some time now.

Now, I know bmd is a sane person because I have interacted with him before. If this is not the case for you it would still be dumb for you to guess that he is not sane without any justification due to the ratio of sane to non-sane people.
--> @Discipulus_Didicit
Which of these more closely matches your intended meaning?
The second.

If this is not the case for you...
Well, all of us have had experiences with him. Alec claimed BMD told him in a PM. But no, I have never known him to behave insanely.

...the ratio of sane to non-sane people
That ratio may not be as low as you think.
--> @ethang5
But no, I have never known him to behave insanely.
<br>

So then is it more likely that Alec was mistaken about bmds opinion or that bmd is insane and has simply never shown symptoms of insanity?

Again, the question begins with the words "Is it more likely that Alec was wring or..." Any question starting with those words should be an easy question to answer.
--> @Discipulus_Didicit
If I wired bmd, it wasn't on purpose.
--> @Alec
If I wired bmd, it wasn't on purpose.
<br>

I believe you. That is actually what I was saying, that you probably made a mistake. No sweat, everyone fucks up sometimes.
--> @Discipulus_Didicit
Do you have beef with Alec?
--> @ethang5
Not that I know of.
--> @Discipulus_Didicit
I didn't feel like taking the test again, so I've decided to list some of the ways that I'm libertarian:

-I support recreational weed legalization.
-I support homosexuality legalization.
-I support legalized polygamy.
-I support legalized prostitution.
-I support open borders.
-I support the 2nd amendment, including legalizing AR15s.
-I think porn should be legal, even for minors.
-I want to abolish the income tax and replace it with a sales tax and a capital gains tax.
-Pro private prisons.

Do I agree with the libertarians on everything?  No.  I disagree with them on abortion and I'm willing to do a lot to prevent abortions, including enforcing mandatory vasectomies worldwide.

9 libertarian policies vs 2 that happen to be right wing.  I'd say I'm pretty libertarian.

I think gay married couples should be able to defend their homegrown weed plants with AR15s if they wanted too.

--> @Discipulus_Didicit
Bmd is a sane person
Thanks, bro. You are sane as well.

-I support legalized prostitution.
but mandatory vasectomies for those who do it?

--> @Dr.Franklin
Basically.  This is necessary to prevent 56 million worldwide abortions per year.
--> @dustryder
Vasectomies still have a failure rate.
Only for the first 2 months.  After that, the unintended pregnancy rate is 0%, unless it grows back, which is super rare (about 1/2000 chance in a lifetime).  Vast majority of abortions don't happen under this plan, and unintended pregnancies are gone too.

I suggest removing the penises of males at birth.
How would guys pee out then?  Pee poisoning might be an issue if guys can't pee out.  Why remove the whole penis when that is not necessary to achieve the goal of sterilising the male to prevent abortions?  Just a mandatory vastectomy ought to do it.
--> @Alec
Only for the first 2 months.  After that, the unintended pregnancy rate is 0%, unless it grows back, which is super rare (about 1/2000 chance in a lifetime).  Vast majority of abortions don't happen under this plan, and unintended pregnancies are gone too.
1/2000 is still significant

How would guys pee out then?  Pee poisoning might be an issue if guys can't pee out.  Why remove the whole penis when that is not necessary to achieve the goal of sterilising the male to prevent abortions?  Just a mandatory vastectomy ought to do it.
Penis removal does not imply bladder, urethra or kidney removal. Pee need not necessarily come out of a penis. You'll note that women have no problem peeing despite completely lacking penises.

The removal of penises completely negates the ability to have sex (and therefore natural pregnancies and abortions). Clearly, there is a higher imperative to save lives than there is for carnal pleasure, hence this trade off is worth it.

As stated before, mandatory vasectomies aren't a perfect solution, while penis removal is. There is still the chance that the vas deferens will grow back. And when it does, 1 out of every 2000 men in their lifetime will find themselves with an unwanted pregnancy. Given the current world population and assuming for a 1:1 ratio of men to female, this means that there will be 1.875 million unintended pregnancies, of which many will lead to abortions because they were all unintended.
--> @dustryder
Removing Fallopian tubes is also a fool-proof way to achieve his goals.
--> @bmdrocks21
That's true enough. However the removal of the fallopian would be an invasive surgery while the removal of the penis would be non-invasive. Hence clearly we should opt for the penis removal.
--> @dustryder
I see that being a less viable option because that completely eliminates the possibility of intercourse, while Fallopian tube removal doesn’t. Unless you castrate the men as well, they will still have a sex drive and cannot alleviate it. Castration makes reproduction impossible, obviously.
--> @bmdrocks21
Opting for an invasive surgery on women just so that men can have sex is very sexist you pig.

There are plenty of options to deal with a man's sex drive. For example, drugs to suppress sex drive and the extraction of sperm before castration
--> @dustryder
Well targeting only men to solve this issue by mutilating their bodies is sexist, you degenerate. 

--> @bmdrocks21
Accusing me of degeneracy and sexism just because I've proposed a legitimate and completely viable solution that necessarily must favour one gender is completely offensive, you reprobate.
--> @dustryder
And the lack of pregnancy is much more beneficial to the woman because they have the most to gain out of this. Women carry the child, or they have to go through the process of killing it via abortion. Since this primarily benefits women, they should be the ones sacrificing something, not men, you cretin
--> @Alec
you dont bleive in legalized prostiituiton if you lose your sexual energy if you do it