Voting i Requirments

Author: CaptainSceptic

Posts

Total: 12
CaptainSceptic
CaptainSceptic's avatar
Debates: 8
Posts: 80
0
0
10
CaptainSceptic's avatar
CaptainSceptic
0
0
10
I just posted my first vote.  I read the rules, and then as I was reading, I realized I have to read and justify every single point.    It took me an hour to read and judge one debate.  Even though when I did my quick read, it is very obvious who won.


Are the voting complexities discouraging people from voting?  I see a number of debates get no votes.

I doubt I am going to go through that effort again.  If the rules allowed for a simpler response maybe I would.


skittlez09
skittlez09's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 1,012
3
3
9
skittlez09's avatar
skittlez09
3
3
9
-->
@CaptainSceptic
Are the voting complexities discouraging people from voting?
Me personally yeah but the rules are there for balancing reasons 




CaptainSceptic
CaptainSceptic's avatar
Debates: 8
Posts: 80
0
0
10
CaptainSceptic's avatar
CaptainSceptic
0
0
10
-->
@skittlez09
Well, I think it is cracking a nut with a sledgehammer.

It's not like this is court.  There are a few options

  • Give a multiple of value if you explain.
  • Give weights to votes based on voter experience.
  • Add a no explanation needed extension for votes that have their voting period expired.

It is kinda like voting is deliberately complicated to discourage it.



Singularity
Singularity's avatar
Debates: 11
Posts: 1,013
2
3
8
Singularity's avatar
Singularity
2
3
8
-->
@CaptainSceptic
So you formed a conclusion based on feel before sitting down to analyze the points?
CaptainSceptic
CaptainSceptic's avatar
Debates: 8
Posts: 80
0
0
10
CaptainSceptic's avatar
CaptainSceptic
0
0
10
-->
@Singularity
Sure did.  When I read it, the issues were very clear.  I did not need to pull out an abacus and an electron microscope to fully diagnose it.


It looks like a duck, quacks like a duck, and walks like a duck,  I don't need to put my finger in its ass to make sure its a duck.



Singularity
Singularity's avatar
Debates: 11
Posts: 1,013
2
3
8
Singularity's avatar
Singularity
2
3
8
-->
@CaptainSceptic
Which debate was it?
CaptainSceptic
CaptainSceptic's avatar
Debates: 8
Posts: 80
0
0
10
CaptainSceptic's avatar
CaptainSceptic
0
0
10
-->
@Singularity
Singularity
Singularity's avatar
Debates: 11
Posts: 1,013
2
3
8
Singularity's avatar
Singularity
2
3
8
-->
@CaptainSceptic
Okay I will read later. I pretty much agree you shouldn't have to write and RFD but you should do your best to remove your own bias, and that points should be weighted based on the length of an RFd. While length of an RFD is an imperfect measure of the analysis put into a debate and the accuracy of it, I think this serves as a balance of encouraging voting while weighting more thoughtful votes more heavily
Melcharaz
Melcharaz's avatar
Debates: 6
Posts: 780
2
5
8
Melcharaz's avatar
Melcharaz
2
5
8
Vote system as it is now discourages voting for most people. A summary of why you voted should be sufficent. More than ddo requires, but less than what this system requires.
CaptainSceptic
CaptainSceptic's avatar
Debates: 8
Posts: 80
0
0
10
CaptainSceptic's avatar
CaptainSceptic
0
0
10
-->
@Melcharaz
What is DDO?
Melcharaz
Melcharaz's avatar
Debates: 6
Posts: 780
2
5
8
Melcharaz's avatar
Melcharaz
2
5
8
Debate.org alot of people here migrated from there.
David
David's avatar
Debates: 92
Posts: 1,218
4
7
10
David's avatar
David
4
7
10
-->
@CaptainSceptic
I appreciate your concern and we will discuss it. 

The voting rules exist to ensure the highest quality of judging possible. I would love to hear your ideas on how we can improve the voting rules.