Dudz Theory

Topic's posts
Posts in total: 20
The Dudz Theory states that in certain states and moods your mind is in, it makes you crave more types of food.

I did an investigation on this where for10 days, my friend and I would just go throughout our days eating what foods we craved. There was direct relationship.

Our logs went like this
-----------------------------

Romantic
MY FRIEND
Carrots
Cookies
Ice Cream

I WOULD
Grapes
Skittles
Ice Cream
Brownies

Stressed
Both
All he could eat was Chips and Gatorade. I could only drink water and eat Takis


Happy
Friend
Burgers
Hot Dogs
Filet


Burgers
Chicken
Hot Dogs

This some of the info I recorded! I am an official scientist now

--> @SupaDudz
Duds hypothesis. This will not qualify as a theory without more rigorous testing.
--> @SupaDudz
How did you measure mood?

Over 10 days, you were only in 3 different moods?

What if you are in more than one mood at once?

Did you control for time of day?
--> @SupaDudz
Interesting choices, for me it would be an amuse-bouche, followed by a gespacho soup, waldorf salad , peking duck, tiramisu and a mignardise with coffee.
--> @Stronn
How did you measure mood?
Emotion. I recorded an emoji chart for my mood and logged my craving
Over 10 days, you were only in 3 different moods?
There were many other moods, but those are key resemblance 
What if you are in more than one mood at once?
We didn't record that, it was mostly a primary emotion

Did you control for time of day?
No. This could affect some food choices.

--> @Goldtop
Genetics could also play a part
You could be taking the chain of causation to be totally reversed. Perhaps the type of food you have been not-having caused the emotion or the nutrition you're lacking leads to yearnings.

It could be time-release reactions too. The craving could be due to 2-craving-ago what you had in your system.
133 days later
I am going to be doing more rigorous testing and coming out with new data
48 days later
--> @SupaDudz
don't let people disuade ya, everyone is a scientist. The only difference is the dedication to truth.
--> @Melcharaz
don't let people disuade ya, everyone is a scientist.
Is this how you delude yourself into thinking the Bible still is true?
Everyone can't be a scientist because I haven't conducted any research. 

--> @omar2345
if you are going to troll me across the forums you will be reported.   As to what i believe, you apparently don't believe it so its of no consequence to you.

Im encouraging people to research and to study. Everyone is a scientist, we all study, we all observe, the only question is, how deep are we gonna go into it? Society recognizes them through salary or quoting them for the depth of research they have done.  I esteem no human any better than another.
--> @Melcharaz
if you are going to troll me across the forums you will be reported.
Not trolling more so stating what is true.

Im encouraging people to research and to study.
Hypocritical coming from a theist.

Everyone is a scientist, we all study, we all observe, the only question is, how deep are we gonna go into it? 
Missed out that not everyone has the academic background to know what they are talking about.
Society recognizes them through salary or quoting them for the depth of research they have done. 
Not true. Someone who has left a mark on history would be long remembered after his death. Salary does not mean anything for how limited of time that person would be alive but a legacy. That remains as long as his/her work doesn't get improved on. The longer it goes the more time is spent trying to improve on his work but if the scientist is really good it may never be topped like Rene Descartes I think therefore I am. 
I esteem no human any better than another. 
I would say a baby is better than a serial killer but guess you disagree. 
--> @omar2345
When was the last time you accused someone of not doing research when you had no idea if they did or didn't?  Don't make false assertions regarding others.
--> @Melcharaz
When was the last time you accused someone of not doing research when you had no idea if they did or didn't?
It is not difficult to understand that theists are irrational but guess if you are a theist it would be difficult. To be rational is to require evidence for your point of view. There is no evidence of God or Gods and no subjective evidence does not count.

Don't make false assertions regarding others. 
It is not false. It is true. No theist can give an argument for God because there is no evidence for it. 
--> @Melcharaz
You haven't done any research since you believe the bible to be true when the lies are legion.
--> @disgusted
another false assertion? and how do you know if i have and haven't done research?  you don't. Don't assume things you don't know if they are true or not.
--> @Melcharaz
I gave the reason in my comment.
--> @disgusted
you gave your speculation which is not foundational to discrediting or disproving that i do indeed do research on what i talk about and believe.
--> @Melcharaz
If you had researched the bible you would know that it is full of lies, you don't know that so you haven't researched it.
--> @disgusted
your assumption of the bible being nothing but lies shows you haven't studied it.  there are many truths in the bible that can be applied now days.  You obviously don't care though and only research the errors or seeming contridictions.