Could aliens ever successfully invade planet Earth?

Author: Benjamin

Posts

Total: 116
Benjamin
Benjamin's avatar
Debates: 79
Posts: 780
4
6
10
Benjamin's avatar
Benjamin
4
6
10
Assumption: Intelligent aliens exist, and they match or outperform our intelligence. They also have a technological head start

Question: would the aliens be able to launch a successful invasion of Earth?



Polytheist-Witch
Polytheist-Witch's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 4,188
3
3
6
Polytheist-Witch's avatar
Polytheist-Witch
3
3
6
Yes.
Theweakeredge
Theweakeredge's avatar
Debates: 33
Posts: 3,457
4
7
10
Theweakeredge's avatar
Theweakeredge
4
7
10
-->
@Benjamin
It depends - how much of a headstart do they have? How much experience do they have militaristically - because you can have the technological disadvantage and still come out on top if your better at fighting wars - see the American Revolution for a good example; however, as British invading Africa shows, even having much much more skilled tropps, as many African nations had, technology that is far ENOUGH away can beat them - it was artillery fire versus... well bows and spears for several nations. 

So.. yeah it depends on two things:
1) How technologically ahead of us are they
2) How much experience and skill do they have in war

Er.. I suppose a third thing too:
3) How large their army is.
Benjamin
Benjamin's avatar
Debates: 79
Posts: 780
4
6
10
Benjamin's avatar
Benjamin
4
6
10
-->
@Theweakeredge
I agree. I also think in space distance is even more important. Distance determines communication delay and thus their reaction time. Distance determines the drop in technological advantage from travelling multiple lightyears, and also the probability of getting off course due to unforeseen events. 

One thing that is interesting though is that their weapons would mostly be useless on Earth. Combat aeroplanes and missiles all rely on aerodynamics, which we have perfected on Earth while the aliens could at best make general assumptions of our atmosphere. Also, the size of the planet is important. If we have tactical missiles able to shoot down descending spacecraft then they must rush down -- landing in the ocean where our navies could deal with them. The size of our planet makes it nearly impossible for any space fleet to contain enough army. Imagine fitting millions of troops into a city-sized spaceship, travel thousands of light years and descend slowly enough to survive while being under heavy fire. This would be unrealistic.

All in all, I think the chances of aliens successfully invading Earth is pretty low. Planetary bombardment not so much though.
Theweakeredge
Theweakeredge's avatar
Debates: 33
Posts: 3,457
4
7
10
Theweakeredge's avatar
Theweakeredge
4
7
10
-->
@Benjamin
Mm, yup, as I said - it all depends on how far advanced their technology is - because if they have scanners that are advanced enough they could have a fairly reliable sample of our atmosphere. 
Discipulus_Didicit
Discipulus_Didicit's avatar
Debates: 9
Posts: 5,294
3
4
10
Discipulus_Didicit's avatar
Discipulus_Didicit
3
4
10
I don't get why you guys are assuming a war with aliens would involve alien fleets and alien soldiers. Are you guys just going with the assumptions given to you by Hollywood or have you just not given the topic much thought?
Benjamin
Benjamin's avatar
Debates: 79
Posts: 780
4
6
10
Benjamin's avatar
Benjamin
4
6
10
-->
@Theweakeredge
A general sample of our atmosphere would not be enough to outweigh our advantage. We can test our missiles and weapons, while the aliens can't.
Theweakeredge
Theweakeredge's avatar
Debates: 33
Posts: 3,457
4
7
10
Theweakeredge's avatar
Theweakeredge
4
7
10
-->
@Benjamin
Um, yeah, because you can oscillate the general air pressure by the percentages of air in the atmosphere, and easily replicate how that would work - I wasn't saying that it "eliminates our advantage" but it would certainly even the playing field, and you are only considering ballistic weaponry, which... isn't all you would expect whatsoever. Hence why it matters how advanced their tech is. 
ILikePie5
ILikePie5's avatar
Debates: 2
Posts: 12,332
3
7
10
ILikePie5's avatar
ILikePie5
3
7
10
-->
@Theweakeredge
So.. yeah it depends on two things:
1) How technologically ahead of us are they
To be able to travel through space in light years, they have to be thousands of years advanced than us.

2) How much experience and skill do they have in war
If their civilization is older than ours which it likely is they’ll definitely have more experience than us.

Er.. I suppose a third thing too:
3) How large their army is.
Eh not necessarily. They could just bombard us from space. 
Discipulus_Didicit
Discipulus_Didicit's avatar
Debates: 9
Posts: 5,294
3
4
10
Discipulus_Didicit's avatar
Discipulus_Didicit
3
4
10
-->
@ILikePie5
Eh not necessarily. They could just bombard us from space. 
Not sure why they would bother. If they wanted to wipe us out they just need to send a small swarm of RKM's from their system aimed at our planet. They don't even need to enter our system.
Benjamin
Benjamin's avatar
Debates: 79
Posts: 780
4
6
10
Benjamin's avatar
Benjamin
4
6
10
-->
@Theweakeredge
What I meant is that the aliens will need a much higher technology discrepancy, merely because our tech is fine-tuned to our environment. In other words, I claim that without our fine-tuning of weaponry the aliens could defeat us with far less technological superiority.

Polytheist-Witch
Polytheist-Witch's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 4,188
3
3
6
Polytheist-Witch's avatar
Polytheist-Witch
3
3
6
There are all kinds of ways an alien race might be able to wipe us out and not all of it would necessarily be intentional.  In the War of the Worlds the aliens died due to a virus we had on Earth but that could just as easily work both ways.  Not mention if their technology effected our bodies or minds in a negative way. Sound waves and such. Then there is all the technology they might have in weaponry and bio weaponry. 
fauxlaw
fauxlaw's avatar
Debates: 77
Posts: 3,565
4
7
10
fauxlaw's avatar
fauxlaw
4
7
10
-->
@Benjamin
Yes, they could, but, would they? I would presume aliens of greater intelligence and technology would have no need to invade Earth in the first place. Resource mining? I suspect if their tech takes them beyond our Kardashev Scale of types, they don't need our resources. Now, if their purpose is other than invasion, a cooperative educational mission, for example, then I, for one, invite their arrival.
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 556
Posts: 19,354
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
They already have, they control our richest and most powerful and have another name; demons.
oromagi
oromagi's avatar
Debates: 117
Posts: 8,689
8
10
11
oromagi's avatar
oromagi
8
10
11
-->
@fauxlaw
The Uplift series by David Brin posits a galactic oligarchy divided into a rigid caste hierarchy according to the prominence of the species that trained and bred your species into sentience and the number of species your species breeds and trains into sentience.  There is no memory of the first sentient species and contradicting speculations about the nature and intent of that prime ancestor species represents the core of most political and religious activity in the galaxy.  When humans are discovered claiming a natural evolution the claim is mostly receiveded as outrageous heresy and lands the Earth at the bottom of the galactic caste system.  Without a sponsor species or any technology or resources worth trading humans would be doomed except for two resources- biological diversity and whale song.  All these systems at the galactic center have been hosting sentient species for millions of years so a natural biologically evolved diversity has never been seen before and everybody's is bidding for some racoon DNA or red oak DNA, etc.  And whale song has a surprising appeal to a wide variety  of auditory sensory organs.  So, you never know what might be worth trading.
fauxlaw
fauxlaw's avatar
Debates: 77
Posts: 3,565
4
7
10
fauxlaw's avatar
fauxlaw
4
7
10
-->
@oromagi
Indeed, and interesting posit. I've not read Brin, but it sounds like something I'd enjoy. At least the higher achieved species appear interested in trade rather than invasion, if only for our consequence of bio-diversity, among which just might include whale song, but, from an audio sensation perspective, I'd certainly argue Beethoven and Led Zeppelin. And thunderstorms.
Benjamin
Benjamin's avatar
Debates: 79
Posts: 780
4
6
10
Benjamin's avatar
Benjamin
4
6
10
-->
@RationalMadman
P1: Demons = spiritiual
P2: Aliens = physical
C: Demons =/= Aliens
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 556
Posts: 19,354
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
-->
@Benjamin
P2 is partially wrong because we are in a simulation and the alien demigods I am referring to are largely outside of it, interacting almost like phantoms/ghosts.
Benjamin
Benjamin's avatar
Debates: 79
Posts: 780
4
6
10
Benjamin's avatar
Benjamin
4
6
10
-->
@RationalMadman
Thousands of brilliant scientist, university professors and bright minds have studied our world without making this discovery.

How do you of all people have access to this information?
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 556
Posts: 19,354
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
-->
@Benjamin
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 11,068
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@Benjamin
Super-hypothetical.

Assuming that they could, then they could.

Assuming that they couldn't, then they couldn't



Ask RatMan....They are seemingly from another planet.


Though..... Might be a virus or bacterium, that sneaks in aboard a piece of defunct Chinese space litter.


Reece101
Reece101's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 1,893
3
2
2
Reece101's avatar
Reece101
3
2
2
-->
@Benjamin
Assumption: Intelligent aliens exist, and they match or outperform our intelligence. They also have a technological head start

Question: would the aliens be able to launch a successful invasion of Earth?
If intelligent aliens achieved efficient interstellar travel to invade Earth:

1. They already far outmatch our technology. 

2. They’ll probably be on a campaign to wipe out life that they deem threatening. Which suggests they have experience. It doesn’t matter though if they have anti-matter bombs or something similarly catastrophic. 

Benjamin
Benjamin's avatar
Debates: 79
Posts: 780
4
6
10
Benjamin's avatar
Benjamin
4
6
10
-->
@Reece101
The thing is though, distance in space is vast --- really vast. Travelling at speeds upwards of C would essentially be to cut away all communication with your home. The aliens could not get access to the experience of other invasions. In fact, they would lag behind technologically. Unless their spaceships are literal planets, they won't be able to improve on their technology during their travels. Therefore, the distance between them and us, in lightyears, dictate the difficulty of invading us. 

There are two possibilities:
  1. They send their spaceships randomly in all directions
  2. They wait for signs of life and then react
In the first case, they won't know anything about us and will have much worse technology than in the second case. In the second case, there would be a long time period between the time we send our first signals and the time they arrive. We would be far technologically superior to today at the time of their arrival. Given that our planet is closer to the battlefield, we have the defenders advantage with regards to creating defences, quicker resupply and quicker implementation of new technology. In the second case, it would be nearly impossible for the aliens to take us down at all, given that technology is limited by the laws of physics which make their superior technology less dominant due to the nature of diminishing returns.


Therefore, the only case worth asking at the current moment is the first one. What if an aliens spaceship or small fleet enters our close proximity by chance and discovers our radio signals. In that case, they would come with superior technology but in low numbers, and they would fight our earthly defences. This battle would be interesting, and I think our Earthly defences would do better than you think. Spaceships are terrible for travelling in the air, in the ocean or on land. Bringing vehicles would be ineffective since our Earthly conditions require specific types of transportation. The spaceships could not land without being shot down by tactical nukes, and they could not stay in orbit for long before we put weapons on our rockets to fend them off. All in all I think an invasion is impossible, to be honest. Movies of alien invasions relly on breaking physical laws, which would be the equivalent of magic. In the real world, unpenetrable armour and alike doesn't exist.

Reece101
Reece101's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 1,893
3
2
2
Reece101's avatar
Reece101
3
2
2
-->
@Benjamin
The thing is though, distance in space is vast --- really vast. Travelling at speeds upwards of C would essentially be to cut away all communication with your home. The aliens could not get access to the experience of other invasions. In fact, they would lag behind technologically. Unless their spaceships are literal planets, they won't be able to improve on their technology during their travels. Therefore, the distance between them and us, in lightyears, dictate the difficulty of invading us. 
In terms of FTL travel, I don’t know why everyone overlooks warp-drives. They’re mathematically possible. 
In terms of FTL communication, quantum communication using entangled particles. 

By the way, what’s a good reason for intelligent aliens to invade Earth? As in they bother to enter our atmosphere for a ground invasion, instead of just annihilating Earth.

Benjamin
Benjamin's avatar
Debates: 79
Posts: 780
4
6
10
Benjamin's avatar
Benjamin
4
6
10
-->
@Reece101
You would be surprised by the number of things that are "mathematically possible". Still it doesn't prove that one could feasibly build one, even with superior technology. And no, there is no reason for such an invasion. This topic is merely a "Hollywood concept", the twist is that we apply logic to it, without scrutinicing its premise.
fauxlaw
fauxlaw's avatar
Debates: 77
Posts: 3,565
4
7
10
fauxlaw's avatar
fauxlaw
4
7
10
-->
@Benjamin
Why can't aliens be spiritual beings?
For that matter, why can't demons be physical beings?
Discipulus_Didicit
Discipulus_Didicit's avatar
Debates: 9
Posts: 5,294
3
4
10
Discipulus_Didicit's avatar
Discipulus_Didicit
3
4
10
-->
@Benjamin
There are two possibilities:
  1. They send their spaceships randomly in all directions
  2. They wait for signs of life and then react
Both of those methods seem outrageously and unnecessarily inefficient. Why not just torch every planet in the galaxy from home without sending ships anywhere? No need to "wait for signs of life" if you can just sterilize all planets in the galaxy in a fraction of the time that it takes for intelligence to develop. A K-2 civilization around a yellow dwarf could do this using just 1% of their economy's energy output and 20th century physics.

Your main problem is that you are thinking inside the box. You can't expect every xenocidal species to do the same.
Reece101
Reece101's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 1,893
3
2
2
Reece101's avatar
Reece101
3
2
2
-->
@Benjamin
You would be surprised by the number of things that are "mathematically possible". Still it doesn't prove that one could feasibly build one, even with superior technology.
No I’m not surprised. Most groundbreaking technological innervations are mathematically formulated long before construction and testing begins. Technology such as novel materials usually have to catch up.

And no, there is no reason for such an invasion. This topic is merely a "Hollywood concept", the twist is that we apply logic to it, without scrutinicing its premise.
If there’s no reason, the aliens must not be that intelligent then.
Reece101
Reece101's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 1,893
3
2
2
Reece101's avatar
Reece101
3
2
2
-->
@fauxlaw
Why can't aliens be spiritual beings?
For that matter, why can't demons be physical beings?
Are you implying aliens will be demons?
That’s xenophobic, but on a cosmic scale.

Are you saying all of them will be demons, even microbes, or just the intelligent ones? 
fauxlaw
fauxlaw's avatar
Debates: 77
Posts: 3,565
4
7
10
fauxlaw's avatar
fauxlaw
4
7
10
-->
@Reece101
Nope, not saying any of those things, Just saying I would not arbitrarily limit the nature of aliens and demons. Why do people want to read into a statement more than the words say? Words mean things; how one interprets them is on that person, not the writer/speaker. Otherwise, one begins to appear as they have an agenda when none is implied but by interpretation not in the words.