Is it moral to give money to beggers

Author: Lemming

Posts

Total: 84
Lemming
Lemming's avatar
Debates: 6
Posts: 3,205
4
4
10
Lemming's avatar
Lemming
4
4
10
Myself I would say no,
Though that there are exceptions.

To my mind the 'moral action, would be to attempt to get them out of that lifestyle,
But the average person is not willing to risk themselves, or their funds, in what they expect often a hopeless endeavor.
For which they are not qualified.
They expect many individuals to prefer said lifestyle, possess an addiction, or mental handicap that 'keeps them to it.

If one is not going to help them, you say, perhaps the 'next most moral act 'would be to give them the money,
But I'd argue giving them directions to a public service that will 'actually help them, or feed them, to be better.
Better than a prolongation of their current lifestyle.
Better to give the money to a charity, or 'work in such a charity oneself.
FLRW
FLRW's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 5,109
3
4
8
FLRW's avatar
FLRW
3
4
8
-->
@Lemming
 
I agree.
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 11,255
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@Lemming
Is money moral?

Or more precisely,

Are the inherent social manifestations of money moral?

Money has long since been a representation of debt,

And is now a representation of hierarchical power.


What is morality anyway?

Other than a justification for something that we feel the need to justify,

Or the condemnation of something that we feel the need to condemn.


Why do we make up all this stuff?

Is it an evolutionary necessity?

Or do we do it just because we can?
Lemming
Lemming's avatar
Debates: 6
Posts: 3,205
4
4
10
Lemming's avatar
Lemming
4
4
10
-->
@zedvictor4
@FLRW
Without money,
An individual often suffers,
Being not so often, as unconventional in outlook as Diogenes.

Money by its purchases can provide shelter, food, hygiene, comfort, safety.

I don't feel like being nihilistic this moment, so I'll speak practically,
Morality is what of we believe to be right and wrong.
An urgent feeling, instinct, habit born of repetition and belief.

We make up morality, because we're humans, wired that way, I'd suppose.
Many organisms 'don't possess much thought-out morality, I'd hazard,
But for humans, I imagine morality has seen evolution, in our biology.

I think we do morality because we 'must.
We 'think too much 'not to, I 'think.

I suppose one could make an argument that giving money is better than nothing, for particular individuals,
An action inspired by sympathy, offering comfort said individual chooses of their own free will to purchase with said money.
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 11,255
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@Lemming
Own free will.
Now that's a red rag to a bull.

Especially in the philosophy forum....LOL



Shelter, food, comfort, hygiene and safety.
All that is available anyway, so why does a genuine beggar* need to exchange money for these supposed essentials.

Isn't this just a manifestation of base human instinct.....Inherent selfishness, always one eye on personal survival and never real concern for those less fortunate.

Some might suggest that for this reason humanity is inherently immoral.

Not intending to denigrate those who have developed a strong sense of compassion.

Nonetheless, compassion also comes at a price.

Compassion becomes a social sub-system, inextricably tied to money, like everything else.



Maybe hardwired selfishness and the invention of a divisive tool (money), were inevitable.

If shelter, food, comfort, hygiene, safety and compassion were our only consideration,

Why would we necessarily motivate material evolution....Technological progress for example.

Maybe human purpose is greater than humanity.

Perhaps therefore, it is essentially moral to be socially immoral.

No free will methinks.


*Genuine Beggar.....You decide.
FLRW
FLRW's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 5,109
3
4
8
FLRW's avatar
FLRW
3
4
8

Mumbai beggar was a millionaire, police find after his death
This is not the first such story where a beggar has turned out to be rich. In 2015, India came to know about its richest beggar — Bharat Jain — who would earn Rs 70,000 to 80,000 per month by begging.

Lemming
Lemming's avatar
Debates: 6
Posts: 3,205
4
4
10
Lemming's avatar
Lemming
4
4
10
-->
@zedvictor4
@FLRW
I find it difficult to speak practically 'without using the words free will.
Though there is a point, a considerable number of individuals homeless possess mental illness, usually untreated (Assumption on my part)
Or they possess addictions, or considerable peer pressure in their peer groups if had.

I am 'doubtful that Shelter, food, comfort, hygiene and safety.
Are 'so available to beggers in society,
But perhaps I underestimate them, and society.

Though if you mean 'society 'has these items, Shelter, food, comfort, hygiene and safety.
I suppose,
But the question of whether we ought structure society with a 'far 'stronger safety net, is another topic.
Though likely one I'd agree strongly with,
'IF one was planning a new country or city.

Money is just a placeholder, a symbol, a representation.
Even if everyone were but brains hooked up to computers online,
Our interests, emotions, activities, efforts, would still be given value.
Even on an island with two individuals, a single 'word, would have value, a 'slight enunciation of kindness or hate.
We 'are.

Purpose and essential, 'depend on what one is speaking of.

True,
Difficult to know the truth of other people, their circumstances, choices and resources available to them, known or unknown.
My assumption though, is that many people begging are not wealthy.
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 564
Posts: 19,919
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
-->
@Lemming
I once bought 2 of a beggar's CDs and risked putting a virus on my computer.

He produced rap and like drum and bass stuff so I was curious.

His raps were not as good as advertised. At least there was no virus and as far as beggars go this was a cool dude technically he's a seller but it was all unofficial so yeah... Something about the way he talked me into it made me want to buy them. I don't regret the very few dollars-worth I spent though, in terms of morality.

The DnB was kind of weird lol.

I don't get where you're coming from though, you really think it's evil? Like you never would even consider giving a beggar any money? 
Lemming
Lemming's avatar
Debates: 6
Posts: 3,205
4
4
10
Lemming's avatar
Lemming
4
4
10
Interesting when one can find small original artists.

I don't think I'd call giving a beggar money 'immoral, unless I went to 'extreme's of taking the 'best moral action in every case, which sounds too difficult for a human, to me.

I've given money to a begger at 'least once in my life, I'd 'suspect it's possible I've given money other times in life, whether to beggars or more normal people who just needed a bit for whatever reason, even if just to buy a soda at work or something.

But only one time in my life stands out, when I was a teenager, where I'd been walking home from the bank, after making a withdrawal, and got blindsided by some fellow, though more I just wasn't paying attention, I forget the particulars, except that I 'think I gave him a $20,
Made the guy rather emotional, in how touched he was, whether people don't usually give that much, or just that type of person, or it was an act.
But it still affected me,
I was still a Christian then, and it left me with an indescribable (Now) emotion, of. . Connectivity to other people, existence, a desire to do more, as well as guilt.
Which may sound a pretentious feeling,
But such is the type of Chri-
Never mind. Point is I've done it once.

The topic 'mostly comes to my mind, due to this topic.

Which may be meant a bit as a joke, bit serious,
But I'm not faulting anyone for their actions, just made me pensive.
For an 'individual, helped out to some cash,
It's a nice act I suppose.
But between giving a man a fish, and giving him a fishing pole,
The fishing pole 'seems better, to me.
But then, some people prefer the fish.

(Addon)
'Now in life, I 'would generally avoid giving money to other people, yes.
Though situation, or emotion 'might suddenly break my preference.

Maybe I think some people would use it better than others,
Maybe I'm embarrassed by being asked.

I'd 'rather just 'keep 'my money though.
I'd rather 'I just have a good time.
(I 'think)
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 564
Posts: 19,919
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
-->
@Lemming
Yeah beggars who are hooked on drugs and shit, it's really hard to actually help them with money but I will give you a piece of advice that I did wrong most of my life (almost all of it until I really thought about it from the beggar's point of view).

If you are strolling in a place and a beggar is there and you aren't truly in a rush, even if you're gonna be stingy, just stop for a second and look at them in the eyes and say 'hello'. One of the most traumatic things for them is how unseen they feel. Of course, if you do start this you probably will end up spending a little but it's not about that. I'm not saying I did that much at all, I had been raised to either ignore them or spend (one or the other) as it seemed rude to just acknowledge them without spending but I relatively recently watched a couple documentaries on ex-homeless and what they described was that the times people saw them and talked to them actually felt better than the times people ran up to them dropped some change and ran away instantly.
Lemming
Lemming's avatar
Debates: 6
Posts: 3,205
4
4
10
Lemming's avatar
Lemming
4
4
10
I think your advice is good,

Though it's for 'my shame, not theirs, that I avert my eyes.
And every time I am reminded that I am not following morality, as I was taught in Christianity.

I don't hope to reclaim that morality,
But that my heart hardens and forms in egoism, that I've come to prefer.
Perhaps in time I'll come to not even 'mind that shame of remembrance.
(Sometimes I think I'd prefer)

Still, if one is speaking of considering others, then I think your post is correct.

8 days later

Double_R
Double_R's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 4,232
3
2
5
Double_R's avatar
Double_R
3
2
5
-->
@Lemming
I would certainly not say it’s immoral to give them money, I also wouldn’t say it’s immoral not to. I ride the NYC subway to work everyday so I come across probably two to three a day (literally had one asking me for change about 5 minutes ago). My attitude is no, I pay my taxes, and enough of my tax dollars has gone to help people without.
3RU7AL
3RU7AL's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 13,282
3
4
9
3RU7AL's avatar
3RU7AL
3
4
9
-->
@Lemming
Myself I would say no,
Though that there are exceptions.

To my mind the 'moral action, would be to attempt to get them out of that lifestyle,
But the average person is not willing to risk themselves, or their funds, in what they expect often a hopeless endeavor.
For which they are not qualified.
They expect many individuals to prefer said lifestyle, possess an addiction, or mental handicap that 'keeps them to it.

If one is not going to help them, you say, perhaps the 'next most moral act 'would be to give them the money,
But I'd argue giving them directions to a public service that will 'actually help them, or feed them, to be better.
Better than a prolongation of their current lifestyle.
Better to give the money to a charity, or 'work in such a charity oneself.
how many homeless people have you actually met ?
3RU7AL
3RU7AL's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 13,282
3
4
9
3RU7AL's avatar
3RU7AL
3
4
9
-->
@zedvictor4
Why do we make up all this stuff?
great question
3RU7AL
3RU7AL's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 13,282
3
4
9
3RU7AL's avatar
3RU7AL
3
4
9
-->
@Lemming
Without money,
An individual often suffers,
food, clothing, and shelter existed long before money
3RU7AL
3RU7AL's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 13,282
3
4
9
3RU7AL's avatar
3RU7AL
3
4
9
-->
@Double_R
I would certainly not say it’s immoral to give them money,
by what moral theory ?
3RU7AL
3RU7AL's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 13,282
3
4
9
3RU7AL's avatar
3RU7AL
3
4
9
-->
@Lemming
And every time I am reminded that I am not following morality, as I was taught in Christianity.
how would you describe your current core moral principle ?
3RU7AL
3RU7AL's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 13,282
3
4
9
3RU7AL's avatar
3RU7AL
3
4
9
-->
@Lemming
I've given money to a begger at 'least once in my life, I'd 'suspect it's possible I've given money other times in life, whether to beggars or more normal people who just needed a bit for whatever reason, even if just to buy a soda at work or something.
what is your moral opinion on giving money to people who support child labor ?
3RU7AL
3RU7AL's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 13,282
3
4
9
3RU7AL's avatar
3RU7AL
3
4
9
-->
@FLRW
Mumbai beggar was a millionaire, police find after his death
therefore all beggars are millionaires
Double_R
Double_R's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 4,232
3
2
5
Double_R's avatar
Double_R
3
2
5
-->
@3RU7AL
I would certainly not say it’s immoral to give them money,
by what moral theory ?
Mine
3RU7AL
3RU7AL's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 13,282
3
4
9
3RU7AL's avatar
3RU7AL
3
4
9
-->
@Double_R
Mine
can you describe your personal moral theory ?
Lemming
Lemming's avatar
Debates: 6
Posts: 3,205
4
4
10
Lemming's avatar
Lemming
4
4
10
-->
@3RU7AL
@Double_R
That's a bit my take as well, I don't really fault people who give,
Even just one day better for someone, is one day better.
But it's still giving fish, not fishing poles.

And taxes are a fair point, how 'much must an individual help,
In the thought of taxes, our efforts 'are already helping, albeit not that specific individual.

One 'could argue not helping, is similar to watching a man drown, and saying "Well, I already paid the lifeguard to watch people, not my fault he's not here."
But then, trying to rescue a drowning person is dangerous, might drown you as well.

I wouldn't say I've had an interaction long enough to 'know, any homeless individuals.
Had a 'couple minute long interactions,
Ah wait, then there was a time I talked to some people at,
Haven for Hope, in San Antonio, Robert G. Marbut - Wikipedia.
As part of clinicals.
Involved talking with X number of people a day, and just writing on interaction,
Reasoning was 'some homeless have drug problems, mental illness, or both.
There was also a clinic or something there, that gave out treatment, 'and medicine I 'think.

Still, even that, isn't 'much 'knowing an individual.

Eh, I walked around San Fransisco a fair bit once, on a vacation, looking at sites,
'Lot of homeless there as well.
Hm, but you say 'met,

Ah wait, there's my second brother, I know him quite well.
Sent you a PM on him, as I don't feel like public speaking of his affairs in public, much this moment.

. . .

Food, Clothing, and Shelter,
'Was money, before paper currency and coins came about.
I'd argue.

. . .

I would describe my current moral values as egoism,
And 'vague limited altruism, motivated by empathy and cultural values.
(Edit, also perceived situational necessity, probably/maybe, reason for altruism)
. . .

I find child labor depressing.
3RU7AL
3RU7AL's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 13,282
3
4
9
3RU7AL's avatar
3RU7AL
3
4
9
-->
@Lemming
egoism is a good starting point

are you saying basically that things that make you feel bad are bad ?
Lemming
Lemming's avatar
Debates: 6
Posts: 3,205
4
4
10
Lemming's avatar
Lemming
4
4
10
-->
@3RU7AL
No, because I find myself tripped up,
By considering too many. . . variables.

Too many points of view, definitions, syllogisms.

I've been thinking this recently after seeing,
Though I'm suspicious of the motives and character of the poster,
Still that's neither here nor there,

Point is a problem I've long had,
I'm not sure 'what my values are,
What I believe, or why,
I worry it just often comes about, in half formed logic and reflex.
Not so much morality in 'general,
But my own.
I blame nihilism, yet the will to live.
3RU7AL
3RU7AL's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 13,282
3
4
9
3RU7AL's avatar
3RU7AL
3
4
9
-->
@Lemming
Not so much morality in 'general,
which could be summed up as (perhaps), "in my personal experience, it does not appear to be useful to me in most cases, to give money to homeless and or otherwise needy individuals"

the key point for me seems to be the fact that it is cheaper to provide shelter and food for homeless individuals than it is to provide emergency medical services

and when i say "cheaper" i mean in terms of tax dollars
Lemming
Lemming's avatar
Debates: 6
Posts: 3,205
4
4
10
Lemming's avatar
Lemming
4
4
10
-->
@3RU7AL
Likely a reason I prefer not giving to charity, or helping others 'over 'much,
Is preferring myself,
Or not preferring them 'over myself.

If my second brother was willing to get off drugs,
I'd be willing to empty my bank account to pay for rehab,
At 'least once.

If I 'knew giving a thousand dollars to a homeless individual would be 'certain they'd improve their lot in life. . .
Not sure I'd do it,
Too 'many people in the world,
And seems my altruism has limits,

Though I may open doors for someone struggling with a package,
Pick an item off the ground for an elderly individual who dropped it,
Take time to give directions to an out of towner,

I dunno,
Perhaps strangers are intangible, vague, in sense of the importance one gives in helping them.

Egoism and Altruism clash,
And by variables I can't see,
One wins, or the other.
3RU7AL
3RU7AL's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 13,282
3
4
9
3RU7AL's avatar
3RU7AL
3
4
9
-->
@Lemming
(1) PROTECT YOURSELF
(2) PROTECT YOUR FAMILY
(3) PROTECT YOUR PROPERTY

and then maybe think about helping strangers at some point if and when you feel like it
FLRW
FLRW's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 5,109
3
4
8
FLRW's avatar
FLRW
3
4
8
-->
@3RU7AL
therefore all beggars are millionaires
No, I'm saying they are either conmen, mentally ill or want something for nothing.  OMG, did I just describe Trump?
Don't forget to buy into Trump's Social Media stock, it's valued between $15 to almost $20 billion with no revenue.
ResurgetExFavilla
ResurgetExFavilla's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 627
3
2
7
ResurgetExFavilla's avatar
ResurgetExFavilla
3
2
7
I think that giving to the poorest among us is not only a morally good action from the beggar's perspective, it is also morally important for the person who gives. It doesn't have to be money, it can also be time, attention, or basic needs like food or shelter. It's a recognition of the universality of human frailty - I know one homeless man who walks the street in the rural area I grew up in. People will stop and talk to him, buy him stuff. For most of his life he had a perfectly normal house with a wife and kids. One day he just had a mental break, his wife left, he lost his kids. Now he just walks, and doesn't even want huge charity. People have offered him houses and whatnot, he just wants to be out in nature. But he loves when people stop to talk or give him food. Another guy in the area was a green beret in Vietnam, it broke him. He was an alcoholic and can't really function, but I probably would be too in his shoes. So what, nobody should give him money and let him suffer because he'll spend some of it on booze? That's some puritanical shit.
Lemming
Lemming's avatar
Debates: 6
Posts: 3,205
4
4
10
Lemming's avatar
Lemming
4
4
10
-->
@ResurgetExFavilla
Fair point,
Something I'd hazard to argue, that I'm unsure about,
Is before societies became so 'mobile,
Villages, city quarters might have had residential beggars, so to speak.

Individuals that the community knew, and 'had known for a long period of time.
That maybe communities would more often look after their own,
That's just me 'guessing about the past though.

Still, modern world, feels it has less real world community interaction,
Peoples lives gotten larger, but smaller,
Phones and mail and internet, we communicate with people far away,
But not our neighbor next door.