Instigator / Pro
0
1387
rating
34
debates
22.06%
won
Topic
#1179

The United States would be better off without Black People

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Winner
0
1

After 1 vote and with 1 point ahead, the winner is...

Average12
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
4
Time for argument
Three days
Max argument characters
4,000
Voting period
Two weeks
Point system
Winner selection
Voting system
Open
Contender / Con
1
1481
rating
5
debates
40.0%
won
Description

Nobody seemed interested in my last debate, so I have renamed it to mean the exact same thing. You must request the debate in the comments, it is impossible to accept. It is sad that I have to rename the debate this to dumb it down to the level needed for people to understand what the debate is about, but here it is. I do have separate rules for blacks if they enter this debate.
Blacks are inferior so I will create an alt account and give them a free vote in their just before the debate expires. They need my charity.
Rules for Blacks
1. You must call me master, throughout the course of the debate. (atleast 5 times per round)
2. You must prove your blackness to my satisfaction.
3. You must answer the next 5 questions to begin round 1.
Why do you guys tip so badly?
What's up with putting hot sauce in everything?
Why can't you guys shut up in movie theaters?
Speaking of movies, Madea is a terrible move, why not just watch good movies instead of picking the movies you watch based on the skin color of the characters?
Why are you guys intent on looking so stupid by sagging your pants, or harming the performance of your vehicle by altering it in stupid ways?

-->
@Dr.Franklin

*******************************************************************
>Reported Vote: Dr.Franklin // Mod action: Removed

>Points Awarded: 1 point to pro

>Reason for Decision: "You must call me master". That's poor conduct
Neither side convinced me

>Reason for Mod Action: "To cast a sufficient vote in the choose winner system, a voter must explicitly, and in the text of their RFD, perform the following tasks: (a) survey the main arguments and counterarguments presented in the debate, (b) weigh those arguments against each other (or explain why certain arguments need not be weighed based on what transpired within the debate itself), and (c) explain how, through the process of weighing, they arrived at their voting decision with regard to assigning argument points. Weighing entails analyzing how the relative strength of one argument or set of arguments outweighed (that is, out-impacted) and/or precluded another argument or set of arguments. Weighing requires analyzing and situating arguments and counterarguments within the context of the debate as a whole.
************************************************************************

-->
@kathy_debater

*******************************************************************
>Reported Vote: Kathy_debater // Mod action: [Removed]
>Points Awarded: win to con

>Reason for Decision: 1. Pro asks Con to call her master
2. Pro is very rude
3. Black people are equal to the whites, everyone know that.
4. Races do not determine fate.
5. I have every reason to report Wylted(Pro).

Reason for Mod Action>Voter is ineligible. In order to vote, an account must: (1) Read the site’s COC AND have completed 2 non-troll/non-FF debate OR have 100 forum posts.

*******************************************************************

-->
@debater

*******************************************************************
>Reported Vote: debater // Mod action: [Removed]
>Points Awarded: win to con

>Reason for Decision: It is unfair for blacks to be considered a servant. White never own black. Plus, the same reasons with kathy_debater.

Reason for Mod Action>Voter is ineligible. In order to vote, an account must: (1) Read the site’s COC AND have completed 2 non-troll/non-FF debate OR have 100 forum posts.

*******************************************************************

-->
@debater

Neither have you. Lots of voter fraud going on here -_-

-->
@kathy_debater

You violated site policy. You cannot vote without having finished two debates (that weren't forfeited) or have at least 100 forum posts

-->
@Wylted

PLEASE, Wylteddddddddddddddddddump

-->
@Wylted

Hope u don't think I am talking to myself. Give some reply

-->
@Wylted

I report you just a second ago

-->
@Wylted

Why, debater agree with me. Start to think you would lose?

-->
@Wylted

Do u know what is going on with Average12's account? I bet he is annoyed by you so he went away

-->
@Wylted

And voting can be about opinion. I suppose your vote for a president whatsoever is partially because of your opinion to him/her.

-->
@Wylted

I want to kill you now. Why do white own black? Like, they are different races, none is more superior or inferior than another.

If I say something wrong, tell me. 'Cause I not an American.

If I can vote you (I am unable to verify my account information) I will NOT vote for you!

Raise a hand if anyone disagree with Wylteddddddddddump

-->
@Wylted

I can't believe my eyes. What you say is TOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO rude. You should not make your opponent call you master!

https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Amy%20Schumer

-->
@Greyparrot

Haha. The best part was when he said he has good tastes in comedians right after that

I can't believe Con used Amy Schumer to support his arguments....

-->
@Gatorade

*******************************************************************
>Reported Vote: Gatorade // Mod action: [Removed]
>Points Awarded: Win to con

>Reason for Decision: Arguments were equal, grammar and spelling goes to Average12 and so does conduct (Wylted repeatedly cussed)

Reason for Mod Action> the voter does not survey and weigh the main arguments.

To award a win, the voter must (1) survey the main arguments and counterarguments in the debate, (2) weigh those arguments and counterarguments against each other, and (3) explain, based on the weighing process, how they reached their decision.
*******************************************************************

-->
@Gatorade

No, voting is not about opinion, LOL. It is about weighing the arguments in an unbiased mamner to fairly judge a debate. You have cheated by not doing so. Your identity is now cheater instead of fair voter.

-->
@Wylted

The votes are the voter's opinion. Please stop trying to game the system so you can win.

-->
@Gatorade

These debates only arguments get weighed. Please stop trying to game the system to cheat so the side you agree with wins.

-->
@Dr.Franklin

*******************************************************************
>Reported Vote: Dr.Franklin // Mod action: [Removed]
>Points Awarded: Tie

>Reason for Decision: Why are you geh?
Who sis i geh?
You are geh
*Pasta Arrives*
AMERICA WANTS TO BOMB ME!!!

Reason for Mod Action> Voters must offer an explanation (which is related to the content of the debate) of why they chose to award no points. Simply saying "my opinion wasn't changed" or "I wasn't able to form an opinion" or "pink elephants smoke meth" are no longer be acceptable RFDs on tied debates. Voters need not meet the standard of sufficiency for awarding argument points, but they must clearly explain why, based on what transpired in the debate, they chose not to award points.

*******************************************************************

-->
@bmdrocks21

It took a while to get there, it was a good dramatic conclusion

-->
@bmdrocks21

Read the bottom half of my round 3 (Under "Heres a reality check for you"). Its for you too. Just to wake you up to your senses and to rethink all of those things you said to me and about black people :D

-->
@Wylted

I only read his last round. I wanna see how it got there lmao

-->
@Wylted

but you have a blue waffle vagina

-->
@Average12

I would ask your mom, but she is on her knees in front of me.

-->
@Wylted

Then proceeded to say "My cotton needs some picking," Okay Mr. "I have not insulted you"

Go ask your mother to pick your cotton

-->
@Wylted

You: "This sounds, like something a coon would say, so between that and the low IQ" "but he has an IQ of probably about 85" "blacks have an average IQ of 85 which is honestly not that far above retarded." "and his negroid family members."

You: "I have not insulted you"

Lol

-->
@Average12

My cotton needs some picking, do you know anybody who would be willing to help?

-->
@Average12

I have not insulted you, please do not insult me. Also refer to me as master, okay boy.

and I dont need any of your stupid votes let the public decide your fate

-->
@Wylted

no bitch

-->
@Average12

You need to call me master in the debate or I can't give you the free vote. Just call me master in the next round, and I won't be forced to punish you. Just do as you are told Kunta Kinte

these debate rules are a joke. call a person master? prove they are black? and then racist sterotypes.