Instigator / Pro
7
1500
rating
4
debates
50.0%
won
Topic

Electro Dragon is Good

Status
Finished

All stages have been completed. The voting points distribution and the result are presented below.

Arguments points
3
0
Sources points
2
2
Spelling and grammar points
1
1
Conduct points
1
0

With 1 vote and 4 points ahead, the winner is ...

That-one-Noob
Parameters
More details
Publication date
Last update date
Category
Games
Time for argument
Three days
Voting system
Judicial decision
Voting period
Two weeks
Point system
Four points
Rating mode
Unrated
Characters per argument
30,000
Judges
Contender / Con
3
1483
rating
5
debates
30.0%
won
Description
~ 24 / 5,000

Stuffyhjku5erdsxdfcgvhjb

Added:
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better spelling and grammar
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Arguments: Pro presents the argument that the Electro-Dragon is good because of it's ability to reset, strike up to three units, and do large amounts of damage. Pro then gives a detailed example of how to use the Electro Dragon effectively. Con posts in the last round and concedes 2 of Pro's points, instead choosing to make his own case. He goes into how it does little damage, how it can activate king tower, and how easy it is to kill, which is incredibly non specific. Overall, Pro wins arguments because Con drops almost all of them and only presents 3 arguments, only 2 of which are decent points.

Sources: Con's source "Clash Royale" is fair enough. I'll tie it.

S+G: Fine on both sides.

Conduct: Con forfeits more rounds, and posts new arguments in the last round, which is generally poor conduct.