Argue the Same Side Challenge!
All stages have been completed. The voting points distribution and the result are presented below.
After not so many votes...
- Publication date
- Last update date
- Time for argument
- Two days
- Voting system
- Open voting
- Voting period
- One month
- Point system
- Winner selection
- Rating mode
- Characters per argument
In round 1, pro will waive and con will post a topic with definitions, deciding his stance (pro or con) on that topic. Pro and con will argue the same side! No rebuttals are allowed. Voters will vote on who argued the topic better. We cannot use the same arguments. Max of 2 arguments for pro and con each, to make it fair. The topic cannot be a truism (Ex. 1+1=2).
There are not four different ways to prove 1+1=2.
We know 1+1=2 is true but not why until the recent century. That is a poor example of a poor example of a resolution. We would have ample example for proving 1+1=2.
your point 2 was about 6 different points combined in one, it is literally breaking the agreement.
while you are asking me to play dirty, I doubt I'll regret it. You didn't even touch on conscious (political) rap and your point 2 is a cheatcode that isn't a real contention. You can't just say 'the internal elements' as if that is a contention.
oh, sure. You could say there's more to just rhythm/flow/whatever the dissertation + data scientists say
you will regret this day you allowed me to go first.
your point 2 is unfair, I will repeat it and justify why. You went so vague that can't count as your actual contention.
do whatever you want. Just make sure to waive one round.
Do I state my two contentions in Round 1? Or you go first?
do you like this?