Instigator / Pro
0
1417
rating
158
debates
32.59%
won
Topic

Argue the Same Side Challenge!

Status
Finished

All stages have been completed. The voting points distribution and the result are presented below.

Voting points
0
0

After not so many votes...

It's a tie!
Parameters
More details
Publication date
Last update date
Category
Miscellaneous
Time for argument
Two days
Voting system
Open voting
Voting period
One month
Point system
Winner selection
Rating mode
Rated
Characters per argument
5,000
Contender / Con
0
1614
rating
350
debates
65.43%
won
Description
~ 365 / 5,000

In round 1, pro will waive and con will post a topic with definitions, deciding his stance (pro or con) on that topic. Pro and con will argue the same side! No rebuttals are allowed. Voters will vote on who argued the topic better. We cannot use the same arguments. Max of 2 arguments for pro and con each, to make it fair. The topic cannot be a truism (Ex. 1+1=2).

Added:
Instigator
--> @Intelligence_06

There are not four different ways to prove 1+1=2.

Added:
--> @seldiora

We know 1+1=2 is true but not why until the recent century. That is a poor example of a poor example of a resolution. We would have ample example for proving 1+1=2.

Added:
Contender
--> @seldiora

your point 2 was about 6 different points combined in one, it is literally breaking the agreement.

Added:
Contender
--> @seldiora

while you are asking me to play dirty, I doubt I'll regret it. You didn't even touch on conscious (political) rap and your point 2 is a cheatcode that isn't a real contention. You can't just say 'the internal elements' as if that is a contention.

Added:
Instigator
--> @RationalMadman

oh, sure. You could say there's more to just rhythm/flow/whatever the dissertation + data scientists say

Added:
Instigator
--> @RationalMadman

you will regret this day you allowed me to go first.

Added:
Contender
--> @seldiora

your point 2 is unfair, I will repeat it and justify why. You went so vague that can't count as your actual contention.

Added:
Instigator
--> @RationalMadman

do whatever you want. Just make sure to waive one round.

Added:
Contender
--> @seldiora

Do I state my two contentions in Round 1? Or you go first?

Added:

neat

Added:
Instigator
--> @Intelligence_06

do you like this?