Instigator / Pro
4
1395
rating
11
debates
4.55%
won
Topic

The three cubed canon, and how the solar system is designed. There are no accidents.

Status
Finished

All stages have been completed. The voting points distribution and the result are presented below.

Arguments points
0
3
Sources points
2
2
Spelling and grammar points
1
1
Conduct points
1
1

With 1 vote and 3 points ahead, the winner is ...

Benjamin
Parameters
More details
Publication date
Last update date
Category
Religion
Time for argument
Two days
Voting system
Open voting
Voting period
Two weeks
Point system
Four points
Rating mode
Rated
Characters per argument
10,080
Contender / Con
7
1740
rating
56
debates
73.21%
won
Description
~ 25 / 5,000

How it is designed to be.

Contender
--> @Undefeatable

thank you for the vote

If a three-cubed canon is supposed to define the solar system design, why is it that the theory works only with the Sun, Earth, and Moon? There are other elements to the solar system [other planets, and their moons, plus an asteroid belt, comets, etc]. Why don't these other elements fit the paradigm?

The same interrupt of logic applies t the squared circle, for which other planets and their moons do not have the same ratio of size as Earth/Moon.

A far better design theory is the prevailing use of the golden ratio: 1:1.618, as demonstrated by Fra Luca de Pacioli, friend of Leo Da Vinci.

What

Instigator
--> @Sum1hugme

"Sure sounds like numerology"

No, numerology is assigning meanings to numbers, and I am not doing that in this case(although I do do it in other circumstances) There is also the gematria aspect, which I do not do, which is assigning numbers to letters and creating meanings for the results. I have dabbled in gematria for a small extent, but I have never gotten into it much, it doesn't really interest me.

--> @janesix

Sure sounds like numerology

Instigator
--> @Sum1hugme

"Numerology is a long, complicated road to nowhere."

It's not numerology.

--> @janesix

Numerology is a long, complicated road to nowhere.