Abprtion is unethical
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
After 2 votes and with 9 points ahead, the winner is...
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 1
- Time for argument
- Two days
- Max argument characters
- 1,000
- Voting period
- Two weeks
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
- Open
Definitions
Ethical: relating to beliefs about what is morally right and wrong.
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/ethical
Abortion : the termination of a pregnancy after, accompanied by, resulting in, or closely followed by the death of the embryo or fetus: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/abortion
In case of FF You are allowed to vote for the other side if you can sufficiently explain why.
Con proves the resolution correct because the agreed upon definition of 'ethical' is 'relating to beliefs about what is morally right and wrong.'.
This is a sneaky definition and also because Pro spells 'abortion' as 'abprtion' as well as that they forfeit Round 1 of the autowin trap, I will give conduct to Con and let arguments be tied as the misspelling of 'abprtion' means Pro is semantically trapping himself/herself (profile says 'male' but Victoria is female) just as much as it traps Con with 'ethical'. I guess I leave arguments tied and give S&G and Conduct to Con as these are flaws on Pro's part that screw Pro over, and the FF post-trap is just bad conduct.
Full forfeit
I am pro life, but I was playing devil's advocate.