Polyamorous relationships are stupid and unhealthy.
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
After 1 vote and with 4 points ahead, the winner is...
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 3
- Time for argument
- Twelve hours
- Max argument characters
- 10,000
- Voting period
- One week
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
- Open
Polyamory is a stupid concept that will initially get people hurt. It has many risks including mental health, sexual health, and altered reality concepts. Many people believe that polyamory is the best way to combat the lack of dating, but it can be dangerous and damaging.
While the Bible 'is a source, it's not quite universal.
Both sides legible.
Conduct to Pro for sticking around.
Polyamory?
"is the practice of, or the desire for, romantic relationships with more than one partner at the same time, with the informed consent of all partners involved." - Wikipedia,
Ah, so it's like Polygamy without the marriage part?
Yeah, looks like Con did make an error in choosing Pro or Con, could also have included more proofs and logics.
PinkDebate Con
Not always equal or exclusive.
Well, not even marriages are always 'equal, or exclusive if you count Polygamy.
I suppose there 'might be more room for abuse in a Polyamorous relationship, but I'd 'think one of those would be easier to leave than a marriage,
Marriage and female Rights in marriage, also aren't always equal with the rights men get, in all countries.
Though some also argue men get a hard shake at times, military service for instance, but the world is vast.
The definition says informed consent, so I assume the people involved would let one another know if they added another person? Well, in an 'ideal such relationship.
yachilviveyachali Pro
Well, I 'suppose arguments to Pro automatically, for obvious reasons.
I'm not well read on the Bible, but I think a number of people make arguments for Polygamy in the Bible at times.
Polyamory not as many arguments, and even those argue it as less or not mentioned.
I think Pro could have done a better job citing sources in the Bible as well as explaining the mechanism of 'how these relationships bring ruination to the soul and harm to the physical body.
But given Con skipped, Pro didn't 'need to.
@Self's Vote comment of
"I suppose there 'might be more room for abuse in a Polyamorous relationship, but I'd 'think one of those would be easier to leave than a marriage,"
Course on 'another hand, marriage then 'and now, often includes guarantees of care, security, sharing of wealth.
Why didn't you argue as pro? You made a mistake.
Now we will be arguing the same thing.