School uniforms should be mandatory
The participant that receives the most points from the voters is declared a winner.
Voting will end in:
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 1
- Time for argument
- Two hours
- Max argument characters
- 10,000
- Voting period
- One week
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
- Open
This debate topic explores the pros and cons of implementing school uniforms as a mandatory dress code in educational institutions. Should schools enforce uniforms to promote discipline, equality, and focus on education, or should students have the freedom to choose their attire?
Pro offers arguments of the value of uniformity in a school, in an evening out of circumstance between students, and that it adds a sense of professionalism of value to schools.
Con argues many forms of inequality would still exist in small but telling ways.
Argues uniforms can stifle individuality, of value to creativity.
Argues uniforms 'cosmetic change, not impactful enough to matter.
Debate is kind of a tit for tat, though I lean towards Con in arguments.
The debate is short, while Con is able to highlight ways uniforms might fall short, and other aspects of education as if not more important.
It is two opposing theories, but both with value.
Even if Pro's benefits are not 'fully received, one can see 'perhaps value in uniforms.
Even if Con is correct in 'possible drawbacks to uniforms such as individuality/"core driver of critical thinking and self-confidence", without proof it remains contrasted with 'Pro's theory.
. . .
I imagine clothes are cheaper than phones, so possible that rich are able to shine more in uniform schools, than non uniform schools, but I couldn't say.
Still, people are able to dress how they like 'outside of school, individuality and flaunting can be had there, but school remains business.
. . . I 'do think that "engaging teachers, supportive environments, and emotional safety" would have a bigger impact than uniforms.
But small changes aren't 'bad, just for being not as 'big as other changes.
Though question of how 'useful uniforms would be, is still a bit in the air.
. . .
'Pro is the only one with sources, but their sources are not easily 'found by voters.
Even after a bit of Google, I'm not able to find the exact quote and web pages, though I am not saying that they do not exist, or that a person more intelligent that I could not find them.
So, I'm voting a tie,
Though I lean towards Pro, due to their sources, but because difficult to find, tie.
The shortness of the debate limits either side from 'doing as much as they might like.
If Pro's sources had been more findable, I think I would have voted Pro, as the sources could have strengthened their arguments 'truths.
If Con had included sources, I might have voted Con, as the sources could have strengthened their arguments 'truths.
If longer, or more rounds, could have gone either way.
Sure.
Act like you don't care but you care the most. CLASSIC.
I am not here to debate you.
Keep you negativity to yourself. Talk when you have a nice argument, nobody's here asking for your yes or no.
Still no.
Why no? School uniforms teach students how to appear presentable, look neat, they symbolise discipline
No.