Are teenagers naturally moody or does society create and exaggerate that image?
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
After 1 vote and with 3 points ahead, the winner is...
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 3
- Time for argument
- One day
- Max argument characters
- 10,000
- Voting period
- One week
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
- Open
Teenagers are often labelled as “moody,” but this stereotype is largely created and exaggerated by society, not based on natural behavior. Society expects teens to act dramatic, emotional, or rebellious, so every normal reaction becomes proof of the stereotype. When adults are stressed or tired, it’s seen as understandable—but when teens feel the same way, they are instantly called “moody.” This double standard shapes how people view teenage emotions. In reality, teens simply experience the same feelings as everyone else—they are just learning how to express them. Media, movies, and social platforms also exaggerate teen moodiness, making it seem like an automatic part of growing up. But that image is socially constructed, not natural. Teenagers are not born moody; they are shaped by how society chooses to portray them. Therefore, the idea of “moody teenagers” is less about biology and more about social expectation, misunderstanding, and stereotypes.
( Okay, so maybe teenagers are “moody,” )
- With this line alone, Con fumbled the debate with a clear concession.
Additionally, Pro's arguments had better persuasive writing, and he/she intelligently used figurative writing to strengthen arguments.
For future debates, I'd advise both opponents to use sources.
Even with a clear concession, con would have some more points if he implemented sources.
Ultimately, the verdict is not even close...