Operation epic fury is justified

Operation epic fury, should end soon, before i start. I do acknowledge that it has costs and gas prices in return, and should not last for longer. But it was needed because of 3 main reason.

First is to prevent nuclear capabilities of Iran. Iran and along with a majority of nations signed the NPT which prevents the acquirement or development of any more nuclear weaponry. Iran is breaking this deal apparently because they have been shown to have buying highly enriched uranium, which is used for nuclear weapons. They claimed it was only for nuclear reactors/energy, but this is scientifically false as you cannot use high enriched uranium for a reactor, only low enriched uranium works for reactors. So unless some Iranian military official clicked the wrong item to put in his amazon basket, they obviously are tying to reach nuclear which is not beneficial and dangerous for United States, as well as other countries, because it threatens homeland security. And seeing how unpredictable Iranian government has been, with also publicly proclaiming almost every month “Death to America”, it probably isnt good to let them have that, so we should stop them before they acquire it.

Second of all, there is an extremely oppressive facist regime in Iran. They have always been known to torture their citizens, but you could also say that about other countries like North Korea, but have you heard of North Korea mass geocoding 30k protesters in their streets at the same time? Iran doesn’t have the military to be able to hold off America without it being devastating for us, as well can see with us only having 13 deaths in this conflict overall. That’s why i also think we need to invade Cuba, but that is a separate debate.

Third, the USA is often debated to need to be stopped, because we are not the world police, but the UN hasn’t done anything about this regime for years, and is only taking in billions of dollars from every country without doing anything meaningful, unlike their past. So if we are the only ones able to do something, shouldn’t we? Or are we supposed to let these citizens suffer.

Good morning. Lets begin with a review of the conflict.

The global positioning indicative of major power conflicts; for modern warfare is total commitment. UK and commonwealth allies depended on super-banker with the golden ticket for peaceful nations unable to function co-operatively with CIA/USA/Israeli instability. The peoples are easy to read, and only a real idiot thinks air strikes, and chariot shots from a bow and arrow can siege a hut, let alone a tower. As I contend, to 'First is to prevent nuclear capabilities of Iran.' USA must connect dot 1 to dot 2. In Canada, our government traded Enriched Uranium to some state that was the wild west of Muslims. Today, murder in Iran has shifted. Since Isreali popular support is quiet, a classic USA trope is evoked. The treaty is paper. (G.W.Bush original) USA has no scientific literature or programming that can teach anything about processing uranium. Plants, WMD, all of this is not wise, or reasonable. Truth be told, both Ally rescuing and Save the world  fail to make it understood. 

I understand it differs from you to me, etc. So my contention is, fictional what ifs, and the 'Uranium' flag is insufficient. Who's it really for? 

Secondly, Fascism. 

In my opinion, the synthesis of nazi politic on domestic fronts and using the boogy man abroad, defines western propaganda. Canada is very fascist domestically. UK even more. France too. Marxist, one, is fascist, one is Nazi (guess) Anarchist, Republicans, democrats. All Democracies are no better, so shame on you. if the common denominator is 50/50 divided, CIA perfection of social disruption shines again.  Sometimes fascism is good for a people, if my area had some it would be good for the young people. So no. I deny a nazi trope, what you should have suggested was Jihad, which is unstoppable. Like it is written and designed, to be cells within and within, and worldwide based with allies. money gets you everything and Jihad is underway. Israeli nationalism is fascism for Israel.  

In addition to this, such a claim from western USA voices, must have never heard your EU and UK allies deny the reality in Ukraine. Look at 90's Ukraine albums for punks .Identical to Hitler. John Adams is upset with Pete. Chad #1 KIM Jong-Un parked beside the white house, to show his heiress her palace. Ballroom not included. What were the subs doing in a big ant cluster? near Africa. At first glance I assumed RUNNING, but now I suggest transfer vessels for evil baddies. All of the above are signals the USA is a half dead corpse already. Texas might survive. It's states again. I think the nazis already moved into quebec castles

The supreme question to leave is, When and who brings some of the African soldiers. US WS gonna get it D.t.A. <3

So what i am getting is that you are unclear on my nuclear points, so i can clear that up again with resources to back it up.

According to the IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency), Iran has been reported by multiple sources, partisan or not, that they have been producing and buying from external sources a 160% increase in Highly enriched Uranium-235. This obviously is a threat to USA security because unlike Russia or North Korea, Iran is widely unpredictable. And also unlike Russia and North Korea, Iran is not militarily backed by global powers, such as china, who have the second largest military in the war. So by taking out the unpredictable and continuously aggressive nuclear country, which broke a treaty that prevents their building of weaponry, we can ensure that world war 3 doesn’t start in the next 4 years. It is not propaganda when you show proof of truth, the truth here is that Iran is a threat.

I also have a feeling you argue against me because you say “America is not morally consistent enough to justify attacks at the moment”. I can see this point but it still is redundant because of the huge difference between the USA at all times. America has been the most fastest growing country in 100 years no doubt, but at times we have had times where we can see our hypocrisy with invasions or handling situations such as Vietnam or maybe George bush’s handling of Iran. This is redundant however because the USA has also made good choices as well, such as when we reinstated the shah of Iran and the country became the fastest growing in the world at that time. So it counteracts one another. This of course is just one example but I’m getting to basically a simile of “If a firefighter once caused damage during a rescue, it doesn’t mean that every future rescue is unjustified”

Woopy shwoopy doopy poopy

I like grapes and all that

GGs