Continuum vs Discrete Quanta

Author: ebuc

Posts

Total: 3
ebuc
ebuc's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,270
3
2
4
ebuc's avatar
ebuc
3
2
4
The following is in three and parts significant to understanding continuum of Gravity vs discreteness of quantum mechanics.  I believe it expresses how a graviton-darkeon-time/reality can never be isolated out as a discrete quantum entity instrumentally and can only be mathematically expressed  quantume pulse within a greataer Quantum Space-time Torus. Or so I logically, and with common sense critical thinking, speculate.

.....1....................5p......7p.................11p........13p..............
-
-
0...............................6................................12...................
..............3p.............................9..........................................
-
-
.........2p.......4......................8......10.................................

It requires 9 nodal events { 0 - 13p } to define a 3D polyhedral tube { think of prism-like shape }, ergo,  in the above numerical pattern,

we have 1..2p...4 as one end of 3D quantum tube and 5p...7p....8 as middle of 3D quantum tube and 10....11p.....13p as the other end of the 3D quantum tube, however,

since this set is based within context of the operational 4-ness of those four line/level as 2D lattice { in 3D a torus }, then the inside-the-3D tube set we have the nuclear observed time sine-wave reality set of five nodal events of  0...3p....6....9....12 nodal events are inherently included, as numerical consistence of linear cause { purpose/point } to the next nodal event.

Lets review:

1...2p....4 is minimal set for a 2D triangular { /\ } opening

5p....7p....8 is minimal set for the 2D girth and another triangular /\  opening

10....11p....12 is other end of triangular and 3D prism-like { polyhedron } tube having three triangular openings and it has 8 triangular faces/hedra triangular openings and is known as a truncated on two ends of a truncated { not shown in next link } di-pryamid.

It is the truncation of the dipyramid above that leads to 8 triangular faces and happens to be same number of faces as the one of only three regular/symmetrical and convex polyhedra of Universe, medial octahedron { LINK }.

So 8 faces/openings/portals of quantum pulse { raviton-darkEon-reality-as-time } has 91 lines-of-relationship.

14^2 = 196 and 196 minus 14 = 182 and 182 divided by 2 = 91 lines-of-relationship.

ebuc
ebuc's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,270
3
2
4
ebuc's avatar
ebuc
3
2
4
Posting #1 again with some clarifications and corrections.

The following is in three and parts significant to understanding continuum of Gravity vs discreteness of quantum mechanics.  I believe it expresses how a graviton-darkeon-time/reality pulse { not a discrete quantum }  can never be isolated out as a discrete quantum entity instrumentally, and can only be mathematically expressed  as a pulse within a greater Quantum Space-time Torus.  Or so I logically, and with common sense critical thinking, speculate.

.....1....................5p......7p.................11p........13p..............
-
-
0...............................6................................12...................
..............3p.............................9..........................................
-
-
.........2p.......4......................8......10.................................

It requires 9 nodal events --within the above set of 14 nodes  0 - 13p---  to define a 3D, polyhedral tube { think of prism-like shape }, ergo,  in the above numerical pattern,

we have 1..2p...4 as one end of 3D quantum tube and 5p...7p....8 as middle girth of 3D, tubular pulse, and 10....11p.....13p as the other triangular  end of the 3D tubular pulse, however,

since this set is based within context of the operational 4-ness of those four line/level, as 2D lattice  --an in 3D a dual invaginated torus---, then with the inside-the-tubular 3D  set,  we have the nuclear observed time sine-wave reality set of five nodal events of  0...3p....6....9....12, that,  are inherently included, as numerical consistency of linear cause { purpose/point? } to the next pulse withing the Quantum Space-time Torus.

Lets review:

1...2p....4 is minimal set for a 2D triangular { /\ } opening

5p....7p....8 is minimal set for the 2D girth and another triangular /\  opening

10....11p....12 is other end of triangular --visualize 3D prism-like polyhedra--l  this pulse within greater tube,  and having three triangular openings,  it has 8 triangular faces/hedra { triangular openings } and is known as a truncated on two ends { not shown in next link } di-pryamid.

It is the truncation of the dipyramid above that leads to 8 triangular faces and happens to be same number of faces as, one of only three regular/symmetrical, and convex polyhedra of Universe, the medial octahedron, yet the two shapes are not the same.

So 8 faces/openings/portals of the 14 nodal event pulse ---graviton-darkEon-reality-as-time--  has 91 lines-of-relationship.

14^2 = 196 and 196 minus 14 = 182 and 182 divided by 2 = 91 lines-of-relationship.

The greater whole tube I label as the Quantum Space-time Torus, that, I believe overlaps and interferes with ultra-high number of other such tori, to compose all of Universe.  Remmber we do not quantise nor quantify Gravity or Dark Energy, as of yet, and may never do so, ergo, the of the four lines/levels in 2D or 3D as outer and inner, we do not observe those two dieametric opposites i.e. we can only directly observe the inside-the-tube reality.


ebuc
ebuc's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,270
3
2
4
ebuc's avatar
ebuc
3
2
4
Singular particle (><)(><) vs a singular pulse <~>

Quantum  particle is not same as a quantum pulse.

A heart beat pulse of blood is a collection of molecules for finite period of time that then stops and then reoccurs <><><><><><> etc

A quantum pulse of the greater Quantum Space-time torus {18 nodal events 153 lines-of-relationship }, vs quantum pulse of 14 nodal events and 91 lines-of-relationship.

18 = 9  + 9 = 153 lines-of-relationship and divisible by 1......3p, 9, 17p,....51........153

14 = 7 + 7 = 91 lines-of-relationship divisible by..............1......7p,.....13p,.............91