Sound of Freedom Movie - why the hate?

Author: Amber

Posts

Total: 17
Topic's author
#1
Amber
Amber's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 145
1
2
6
Amber's avatar
Amber
1
2
6
I finally got around to watching the Sound of Freedom. 

As a mother, I would turn into a wild frenzied momma bear if anyone took my two kids. 

But I have seen references online that some on the left berated this movie as being nothing but Qanon conspiracy while never questioning why no one but the madam has been charged and convicted of Epstein's heinous crimes and ALL THOSE INVOLVED!!! 


What gives?

There is no greater crime than sex trafficking of children, yet only ONE person sits in jail because of a decades long operation that clearly involved MANY Democrat elites. 

Two tiers of justice.

#2
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 10
Posts: 1,700
3
4
8
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
8
I haven't watched it yet but intend to.  

The movie seems to state a few things.

1. Child trafficking occurs
2. Child trafficking is bad. 

This message suspiciously pissed off the mainstream media. This is why I fully support the metoo movement. The response to say Child trafficking is bad seems to be some sort of sick confession by the leftists staying it.

The main criticism I see of the film is bitching that it is inaccurate. It's called artistic license assholes and no nonfiction movie is accurate. Get over it. I don't believe ahit I saw in Titanic. I just think it was entertaining
Topic's author
#3
Amber
Amber's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 145
1
2
6
Amber's avatar
Amber
1
2
6
The main criticism I see of the film is bitching that it is inaccurate. It's called artistic license assholes and no nonfiction movie is accurate. Get over it. I don't believe ahit I saw in Titanic. I just think it was entertaining
Agreed. 
Far too many people take the movies far too literally.
Like, my husband who worked in law enforcement always has something to say whenever we watch a cop show. 
It's television for crying out loud. It's not meant to be 100% accurate. Just entertaining and engaging so you will watch more of it and make them money in doing so.
I so want to tell him to shut up sometimes, because I miss parts of the dialogue when he is ranting. But hey, I get it. He knows his stuff...but again, it's just fiction. 

#4
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 564
Posts: 19,930
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
-->
@Amber
As a mother, I would turn into a wild frenzied momma bear if anyone took my two kids. 
consider which 'wing' you are backing.

In a capitalist, free market economy where the rich rule without restriction you can be sure they will abuse anyone for profit. Consider why child sex trafficking happens far less in left wing progressive nations than right wing ultra capitalist ones.
#5
ADreamOfLiberty
ADreamOfLiberty's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 2,847
3
2
2
ADreamOfLiberty's avatar
ADreamOfLiberty
3
2
2
Make everyone poor, then they can't afford sex slaves.

Well now I've seen every argument for socialism.
Topic's author
#6
Amber
Amber's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 145
1
2
6
Amber's avatar
Amber
1
2
6
-->
@RationalMadman
Consider why child sex trafficking happens far less in left wing progressive nations than right wing ultra capitalist ones.
Oh really?




#7
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 564
Posts: 19,930
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
-->
@Amber
You don't consider Afghanistan and Eritrea conservative right wing shit holes?
Topic's author
#8
Amber
Amber's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 145
1
2
6
Amber's avatar
Amber
1
2
6
-->
@RationalMadman
Shit holes, yes; right wing (whatever that means) conservative, nope. 
#9
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 564
Posts: 19,930
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
-->
@Amber
Not sure how to be more conservative than the Taliban but you do you, right wing at least was admitted.
Topic's author
#10
Amber
Amber's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 145
1
2
6
Amber's avatar
Amber
1
2
6
-->
@RationalMadman
not sure how to be more conservative than the Taliban
Conservative:
specifically: such a philosophy calling for lower taxes, limited government regulation of business and investing, a strong national defense, and individual financial responsibility for personal needs (such as retirement income or health-care coverage)
Yeah, I doubt the Taliban is adhering to let alone advocating for anything of the sort. 
#11
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 564
Posts: 19,930
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
-->
@Amber
Conservatism is a cultural, social, and political philosophy that seeks to promote and to preserve traditional institutions, customs, and values.[1][2][3] The central tenets of conservatism may vary in relation to the culture and civilization in which it appears.[4] In Western culture, depending on the particular nation, conservatives seek to promote a range of institutions, such as the nuclear family, organized religion, the military, the nation-state, property rights, rule of law, aristocracy, and monarchy.[5] Conservatives tend to favour institutions and practices that guarantee social order and historical continuity.[6]
Topic's author
#12
Amber
Amber's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 145
1
2
6
Amber's avatar
Amber
1
2
6
-->
@RationalMadman
Each word in the English language as more than one meaning. 
Context matters when giving the intended meaning of the term being used. 
The part of the definition I took applies. Yours does not. 
The Taliban has no interest in rule of law, the nuclear family, property rights, social order...that is, unless, it is male dominated through unchecked violence against girls, women and gays/queers. That is not conservatism. Violence is NOT conservatism. The left uses violence to force their tolerance and acceptance of Taliban ways of FACISM! 

#13
FLRW
FLRW's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 5,122
3
4
8
FLRW's avatar
FLRW
3
4
8

“The Taliban is a conservative, religious force, the U.S. is godless and liberal,” wrote influential far-right operative Nick Fuentes, who leads a white-supremacist and counts at least one Republican Congressman as an ally, on his Telegram channel. “The defeat of the U.S. government in Afghanistan is unequivocally a positive development.”
#14
ADreamOfLiberty
ADreamOfLiberty's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 2,847
3
2
2
ADreamOfLiberty's avatar
ADreamOfLiberty
3
2
2
-->
@FLRW
Osama bin laden named carbon emissions as one of the reasons he destroyed the world trade centers.
#15
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 22,962
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@Amber
Since the modern Democrat party is the party of the rich, it logically follows that it is also the party of child trafficking.
#16
Sidewalker
Sidewalker's avatar
Debates: 6
Posts: 2,029
3
2
4
Sidewalker's avatar
Sidewalker
3
2
4
-->
@Greyparrot
Since the modern Democrat party is the party of the rich, it logically follows that it is also the party of child trafficking.
So logically speaking, the reason you aren't a pedophile is you can't afford it?


#17
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 22,962
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
If you are morally bankrupt like a Democrat, stealing comes as easily as pedophilia.