Should anti-theists be allowed to express their opinions ?

Author: Deb-8-a-bull ,

Topic's posts

Posts in total: 35
  • Deb-8-a-bull
    Deb-8-a-bull avatar
    Debates: 0
    Forum posts: 1,030
    2
    2
    3
    Deb-8-a-bull avatar
    Deb-8-a-bull
    On religion.

    Now I haven't been through this sites rules,  but I'm thinking it may be anti-theist ( UNFRIENDLY )  
    Work against him or her so to speak. 
    Hold that back it does. hummm 

    what's that ????
    Prejudice.
    Calm down ,I don't know about that but there is a Avenue there.


     
  • Goldtop
    Goldtop avatar
    Debates: 0
    Forum posts: 1,713
    2
    1
    2
    Goldtop avatar
    Goldtop
    Anti-atheists spread their opinions here every day, each opinion full of hatred and fear.

    They've been doing this for a very long time and are protected under the freedom of religion.

    Standing up to them means we are taking away their religious freedom to hate and fear us.
  • Deb-8-a-bull
    Deb-8-a-bull avatar
    Debates: 0
    Forum posts: 1,030
    2
    2
    3
    Deb-8-a-bull avatar
    Deb-8-a-bull

    So thats a yes to ( Anti-theists )  being able to. 

  • Goldtop
    Goldtop avatar
    Debates: 0
    Forum posts: 1,713
    2
    1
    2
    Goldtop avatar
    Goldtop
    --> @Deb-8-a-bull
    It's not really "Anti-Theist"

    It's "Anti-Theism"

    The first is towards people, which is wrong, it's towards the failed ideologies that make those good people say and do bad things.

  • Plisken
    Plisken avatar
    Debates: 0
    Forum posts: 709
    2
    1
    4
    Plisken avatar
    Plisken
    Let us join in solidarity, and exhibit a testament in reflective emulation, that the way forward to finally solving the problem of idiocy, is for everyone to embrace stupidity.

  • RationalMadman
    RationalMadman avatar
    Debates: 301
    Forum posts: 8,991
    10
    10
    11
    RationalMadman avatar
    RationalMadman
    I am actually fond of the way religion makes the sheeple satisfied with their dull minds. It makes them easier to outsmart and dominate for us real thinkers to lead.
  • Mopac
    Mopac avatar
    Debates: 4
    Forum posts: 7,758
    3
    4
    7
    Mopac avatar
    Mopac
    No one here is trying to hinder the God deniers from making assholes of themselves.
  • RationalMadman
    RationalMadman avatar
    Debates: 301
    Forum posts: 8,991
    10
    10
    11
    RationalMadman avatar
    RationalMadman
    --> @Mopac
    LOL God deniers are inherently assholes eh? God believers never are, eh? xDDDD
  • Mopac
    Mopac avatar
    Debates: 4
    Forum posts: 7,758
    3
    4
    7
    Mopac avatar
    Mopac
    --> @RationalMadman
    That isn't what I said.

    But I mean, look at you. You talk about dominating people. I certainly didn't accuse you of that, you freely gave that info away.





  • RationalMadman
    RationalMadman avatar
    Debates: 301
    Forum posts: 8,991
    10
    10
    11
    RationalMadman avatar
    RationalMadman
    --> @Mopac
    Hahaha, look darling Mopac. Do you think that everyone high ranking in your beloved Orthodox Church 'interpretation authority agency' who decide how to interpret lines, what to do and not do etc are all actual believers? Think some aren't in it for the glory and fame? Think that in the past the Crusades are just a fucking myth? Stop kidding yourself.
  • Mopac
    Mopac avatar
    Debates: 4
    Forum posts: 7,758
    3
    4
    7
    Mopac avatar
    Mopac
    --> @RationalMadman
    The Orthodox Church didn't call Crusades, that is all on Rome.


    Who sacked Orthodox Churches during said Crusades, btw.

    And even if a few wicked priests slip through, the church is constructed in such a way that no lasting damage can be dine by them.

    You can mock me, my beliefs, and my church all you want, but know that I still see your worldview as juvenille. As for what you think of mine, you don't even understand it to judge it.

    And to be frank, I don't believe for a second you dominate anyone. Maybe in your little constructed fantasy land, but certainly not in the real world.

  • RationalMadman
    RationalMadman avatar
    Debates: 301
    Forum posts: 8,991
    10
    10
    11
    RationalMadman avatar
    RationalMadman
    --> @Mopac
    Hahaha, your belief in my inability to dominate is as sound as your belief that the Christian God is undeniably true and real because it's defined in a dictionary as 'supreme ultimate reality' as part of one of a few definitions.
  • Mopac
    Mopac avatar
    Debates: 4
    Forum posts: 7,758
    3
    4
    7
    Mopac avatar
    Mopac
    --> @RationalMadman
    No matter how many times that straw man gets repeated, it doesn't become any more true.

  • RationalMadman
    RationalMadman avatar
    Debates: 301
    Forum posts: 8,991
    10
    10
    11
    RationalMadman avatar
    RationalMadman
    --> @Mopac
    Mopac I tell you to here and now, I am better than you at debating that bullshit strawman in a way that isn't strawman. You don't even use the term 'simulated' let alone 'mechanistic reality despite the simulation having to be true' to explain what the hell you are trying to convey.
  • Mopac
    Mopac avatar
    Debates: 4
    Forum posts: 7,758
    3
    4
    7
    Mopac avatar
    Mopac
    --> @RationalMadman
    I don't care if you are the greatest sophist in the world, no argument stands against God.
  • Goldtop
    Goldtop avatar
    Debates: 0
    Forum posts: 1,713
    2
    1
    2
    Goldtop avatar
    Goldtop
    --> @Mopac
    No matter how many times that straw man gets repeated, it doesn't become any more true.
    It's hilarious that you haven't figured out that's what everyone here has been telling you. Lol

  • Mopac
    Mopac avatar
    Debates: 4
    Forum posts: 7,758
    3
    4
    7
    Mopac avatar
    Mopac
    --> @Goldtop
    And everytime I correct those who perpetuate this misrepresentation, they persist in repeating it.

    I do not use a dictionary to prove God. That is silly. I use a dictionary to prove that atheists are arbitrary and in denial of reality. It works too, because it is obvious that the atheist is simply refusing to talk about the same thing I am talking about.


    But there are several people, including those who frequent this forum, who have come to realize something through this simple use of the dictionary.


    No, I use the dictionary to prove that people like you are unreasonable. I believe posterity will rule in my favor overwhelmingly.

  • disgusted
    disgusted avatar
    Debates: 0
    Forum posts: 4,959
    2
    3
    3
    disgusted avatar
    disgusted
    --> @Mopac
    No argument needs to stand against god because no evidence stands for it.
  • BrutalTruth
    BrutalTruth avatar
    Debates: 2
    Forum posts: 218
    0
    2
    6
    BrutalTruth avatar
    BrutalTruth
    --> @Mopac
    I do not use a dictionary to prove God. That is silly.
    He loves to lie, doesn't he? He and I literally just had a formal debate over the claim that the Christian god exists, and every single argument he gave for that claim used the dictionary for proof.

    Alright Mr. Mopac, I'm gunna give you the chance to put your money where your mouth is. Give me a valid argument for the existence of the Christian god that does not mention, at all, any dictionary whatsoever. If you succeed, I'll unblock you.

  • Mopac
    Mopac avatar
    Debates: 4
    Forum posts: 7,758
    3
    4
    7
    Mopac avatar
    Mopac
    @brutaltruth


    The fact that you exist and have an experience is evidence of God.



    You can keep me blocked all you want though. It makes you look bad, not me.


  • BrutalTruth
    BrutalTruth avatar
    Debates: 2
    Forum posts: 218
    0
    2
    6
    BrutalTruth avatar
    BrutalTruth
    --> @Mopac
    The fact that you exist and have an experience is evidence of God.

    Explain how existence and experience is evidence of God.
  • Deb-8-a-bull
    Deb-8-a-bull avatar
    Debates: 0
    Forum posts: 1,030
    2
    2
    3
    Deb-8-a-bull avatar
    Deb-8-a-bull
    Id like to here the way he become a orthodox christian.  If he just picked it , or if someone else just picked it for him then ummmmmmmmm.
    Well it's not really " religious y " like it's nothing to do with god. However the people w picked it for you might have actually been told by God.

    Well played. 
  • Deb-8-a-bull
    Deb-8-a-bull avatar
    Debates: 0
    Forum posts: 1,030
    2
    2
    3
    Deb-8-a-bull avatar
    Deb-8-a-bull
    As a atheist you can use any religions writings during debate. 
    Because watvh this . 
    Bammmmmmmmm im a Muslim, 
    '10 seconds passes' 
    Now a orth Christian, 
    Powwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww. 
    10 seconds later. 
    I'm a atheist again. 



  • Mopac
    Mopac avatar
    Debates: 4
    Forum posts: 7,758
    3
    4
    7
    Mopac avatar
    Mopac
    @blockedtruth

    The fact that you are having an experience is proof that there is some form of existence. If there is some form of existence, there has to be a way things truly are. Existence as it actually is.

    The Supreme Existence, the way it actually is, that is what we call God.

  • Mopac
    Mopac avatar
    Debates: 4
    Forum posts: 7,758
    3
    4
    7
    Mopac avatar
    Mopac
    --> @Deb-8-a-bull
    It was the last thing I thought I'd become, because on the surface it looks very off putting and foreign. However, I eventually realized that it is in fact True Religion.

    It was a process, for sure.