Paintings with no painter.

Author: secularmerlin ,

Topic's posts

Posts in total: 8

25 days later

67 days later

  • Wylted
    Wylted avatar
    Debates: 26
    Forum posts: 2,603
    3
    4
    9
    Wylted avatar
    Wylted
    Can't wait for them to get better than humans at writing

23 days later

  • Bifolkal
    Bifolkal avatar
    Debates: 0
    Forum posts: 7
    0
    0
    4
    Bifolkal avatar
    Bifolkal
    I use a 3d printer to model all of my pointillism in real life...I think I'm still better than those silly computers.
  • Mharman
    Mharman avatar
    Debates: 12
    Forum posts: 2,293
    2
    4
    9
    Mharman avatar
    Mharman
    --> @secularmerlin
    That's because they can easily replicate the randomness that is modern art.
  • Mharman
    Mharman avatar
    Debates: 12
    Forum posts: 2,293
    2
    4
    9
    Mharman avatar
    Mharman
    --> @ResurgetExFavilla
    Hehehe... nice reference.
  • secularmerlin
    secularmerlin avatar
    Debates: 0
    Forum posts: 4,967
    3
    3
    3
    secularmerlin avatar
    secularmerlin
    --> @Mharman
    Some of the images look more than random. They aren't Jackson Pollackesque sprays of dots they look like paintings of objects. Perhaps a bit abstract but if you read the article that is more like human art than a lackluster computer paint by numbers. This is what the researchers were trying to do. Honestly what makes human paintings more qualified as works of art than any of the images presented? Art stubbornly defies definition and pushes boundaries. What constitutes art is subjective not objective.

153 days later