Thoughts on the Jews

10 years ago, you say Jews run the media, you get labeled an anti semite by the Jewish media (because then, the Jews wanted secrecy; they wanted to be able to control what people thought in the easy way; without people knowing who ran the media).

But now, I can say the Jews run the media and the Jews aren't going to call it anti sematic.  Now, they will call actual Nazi stuff anti sematic (which is correct; Hitler was horrible and everyone should hate him for murdering 10 million people; 60% of which were Jewish), but they will let the, "Jews control the media" fact be known to people (because the Jews now have egos and they want people to know who's in charge, which I can respect because if I had the media power of Jews, then I would want people to know I'm in charge).  But when you flee the Holocaust and move to a country to take over the media; you end up very timid.  George Soros looks like and acts like a very timid Jew because his family fled the Holocaust.  But I think later generation Jews are having big egos when they end up controlling the media.  Charismatic people tend to have big egos.  And I respect that.

If there was an Olympic sport about creating the strongest "nobody asked" vibes, you might win.

Your collectivism offends me BTW.

@ADOL

That's the case for every DART thread here.

I don't care.  Collectivism is ok if the collectivism meets one of the 2 following criteria:

Claiming your generic black kid is raised by a single mother meets only criteria 1, so it's fine.  

Claiming Asians have slanted eyes meets criteria 1 and 2, so it's fine.

Claiming your generic American Jew eat Kosher meets only criteria 2, so it's fine.

Claiming your generic American Jew drinks Christain blood meets neither criteria, so THEN it's offensive.

Claiming the generic Jews have big egos might meet criteria 1, but certainly criteria 2 (there is nothing wrong with having a big ego), so it's fine.

🤣

Just a technicality, it was 11 million, not 10.

Hate alone is an unwise emotion.

Jews are just another bunch of folk who think that they are completely  different to every other bunch of folk.

It's a common misunderstanding.

Which isn't to say that certain peoples do not display certain discernibly differentiating characteristics.

Though if Human A fucks Human B they will generally produce Human C.

And then there's religious baloney to consider...There's always religious baloney to consider.

And dick modifications...Don't forget dick modifications.

Jews were God's chosen people, they met the real Father and even Holy Spirit first.

Yahweh chose them. There is also a theory but it is semiheretical that Jesus was the Angel of the Lord in Old Testament as this angel claimed to be God itself and never revealed his/its name.

The problem is after Jesus revealed himself as the Christ Messiah, the Pharisees ans other Jewish sects continued to disbelieve him whereas others such as the apostles helped bring forrh the complete second part to Judaism (the New Testament).

In some ways in a technical sense, Christianity is version 2 Judaism, that is why the Old Testament is at least 85%  from Jewish scripture.

The main Jewish sect that truly know who they see as the non-Jesus Christ Messiah are the Orthodox who see King David as the Christ.

The others seem to still be waiting except Messianic Jews who are Christians in a... Weird way.

Exceptions do exist; some Jews aren't into arguing; but you live enough; you notice patterns.

Jews like arguing; Latinos love to party; Whites are Vanilla and ambitious; Jews are extremely vanilla despite their love for arguing, FBAs play basketball (and are woke socialists, especially in Chicago); Italians are direct; the Irish are soft spoken, the Jamaicans are extremely curious; Muslims are so Kneen on claiming Anti Zionism is not anti semetism (until you mention that 85% of Jews are Zionists, then they hate the Jews) and they are extremely peaceful and if you go to a mosque, then then will try and convert you to their religion (only through acceptable means), Indians work at 7/11, every racial group except whites has liberals and conservatives, and they usually aim for ideological consistency (which is why you see few of them run for public office, because ideologically, they are more centrist).  Jews are also more centrist, but they actually want power because since they endured the Holocaust when the media was against them, they want to run the media so it's protection from a new Holocaust.  Jamaicans are ideologically extremely curious and happy people.

These are general statements; not always true, but you notice patterns.

Yep.

Certain MANGOD tales were such.

Other tales developed both before and afterwards.

Whereas Scientists, however fundamental their science, looked at things with a bit more realism and came up with alternative suggestions.

But hey, acquired and transferred data is persistent.

Scientists can only study the blatant. They are hapless when it comes to anything abatract and mystical.

It is like studying the cake in front if you while pretending you can deny the baker is guaranteed to exist.

Hey Remy.

Just saying to the new Ratman. (He's reincarnated, both in name and religion).

The generational transfer of data is persistent and will inevitably result as "patterns" in regional and cultural sub-groups.

Which is why Inuit's are not big on Witchetty Grubs, and Aborigines  not big into Grizzly Bears....Though I expect that both have developed a modern cultural attachment to smartphones.

Rudimentary scientists discovered baking, and latter day scientists continue to push the limits of food production and development...Have theory....Study and test.

Whereas hapless mystics just came up with an abstract idea and left it at that...Have theory... Sing songs, dress up and generally do daft stuff.

Wrong. Other than formerly Pagan Greece who is nearly all Christians now, Christians are the founders of modern science in general especially medicine.

Christians used to burn heretics.

And the Mesopotamian cradle of civilisation and all it's religious baloney predates Christian baloney by several thousands of years.

Though it's a tad daft to assume that enforcing and enslaving  religious societies won't produce rational thinkers.

 Eventually, even the mystics had to concede that Galileo wasn't such a daft guy after all.

Hmmmmmm.

Well yes, such was the development of human societies.

Though let's be honest, recorded history was somewhat sketchy to say the least...And was not necessarily current or factual.

We will never know the truth...And it's a tad foolish to make it up.

So you can say that about history but other cant say the same about science.

You're rushing Ratman.

I can't make a lot of sense of that last statement.

You:

My reply:

Christians did not need science or medicine. The gifts of the Holy Spirit allowed them to perform miracles .