Want girlfriend?

Author: TheGreatSunGod

Posts

Total: 36
Topic's author
#1
TheGreatSunGod
TheGreatSunGod's avatar
Debates: 27
Posts: 1,396
3
4
8
TheGreatSunGod's avatar
TheGreatSunGod
3
4
8
I watched this video, and it greatly sums up the whole thing now.


https://youtu.be/Jz8QT8KcXVI?si=J3LFawOjCKBdHvn3


It lasts 16 minutes, but I will just sum it up in few words.

You need:

1. Economical sovereignty
2. Philosophical mind
3. Physical strength
4. Never ever be needy
5. Have power
6. Control when you give your attention


The 4 is actually very important here. When a man is needy, it is a big turn off for all women. If you beg for woman's attention, she will use it only to control you, she will give and withhold her attention to build compliance. But she wont be yours because unless you are a very rich man, being needy is the worst possible way to get any girls.


Women are not like men, actually. They dont have same feelings now. A man will rarely look at a woman and consider her material wealth or physical strength or power she has. A woman will almost always meassure a man by his material wealth, by power he has.


Also, woman meassures a man by how compliant he is, but this actually works opposite. The more compliant you are, the less attractive you are. Women are turned on by those who ignore them, and very turned off by those who give them full attention. If you give woman your full attention all the time, you quickly become very boring. But if you withhold your attention after giving it, woman thinks "I will lose him unless I try". If you withhold your attention, it means woman must make effort to get your attention, not the other way around now. And this is what makes you attractive, as it gives your attention more value. If you just give your attention for free, then it has no any value. If you give too much attention, then value is even further decreased. If you withhold attention, the desire for your attention builds up.
Topic's author
#2
TheGreatSunGod
TheGreatSunGod's avatar
Debates: 27
Posts: 1,396
3
4
8
TheGreatSunGod's avatar
TheGreatSunGod
3
4
8
Also, remember the trick to understand true goals of other people:

"If they wanted this, they would..."

"If they didnt want, they wouldnt..."

This is very simple. For example, if some girl wanted to be with you, she would do everything to make it happen. You wouldnt have to beg her. She wouldnt run to other men.

You can understand true goals of people by setting up a certain goal and seeing if they act consistently with it.

Like, if someone wants to be your friend or girlfriend, she will act very consistently with one of those goals.
#3
FishChaser
FishChaser's avatar
Debates: 109
Posts: 321
2
4
9
FishChaser's avatar
FishChaser
2
4
9
-->
@TheGreatSunGod
I don't care what anyone thinks, the black pill is 100% true. Red pill mostly comes in handy for guys who would otherwise be seen as mid trying to compensate for their lack of innate attractiveness, but it will NEVER get you as far as being seen as a 10 by default will. Women's way of selecting mates isn't a culturally conditioned thing, they are genetically wired to have the exact same preferences and behaviors when it comes to finding a mate. If you are just plain unattractive to them there is no strategy you can employ to win them over, if you are highly attractive to them there is no strategy you would even need to employ. Your genetics will literally do all the heavy lifting as long as they see you as 8-10/10

There is only one way around it, unironically you have to date autistic women. Only neurodivergent women can have the attraction mechanisms "broken" so they aren't programmed exactly the same as other girls and attracted to the same guys. It has to be autism specifically because other mental illnesses come with more baggage and toxicity in most cases. No neurotypical woman can ever be fully in love with someone who isn't a chad, but autistic girls can have way more of an individualized type that they prefer. You STILL have to fit the type though, it isn't that black pill doesn't apply it's just that they see a different type of guy as inherently more attractive.
Topic's author
#4
TheGreatSunGod
TheGreatSunGod's avatar
Debates: 27
Posts: 1,396
3
4
8
TheGreatSunGod's avatar
TheGreatSunGod
3
4
8
-->
@FishChaser
If you are just plain unattractive to them there is no strategy you can employ to win them over, if you are highly attractive to them there is no strategy you would even need to employ
Well, yes, but many women marry for money or power. Do you think Trump is attractive? He is very ugly. But he is rich and powerful, and that is what got him a model wife who otherwise wouldnt even look at him then.
Topic's author
#5
TheGreatSunGod
TheGreatSunGod's avatar
Debates: 27
Posts: 1,396
3
4
8
TheGreatSunGod's avatar
TheGreatSunGod
3
4
8
-->
@FishChaser
Also, you can work on being attractive too. Usually some change in hair, muscles or clothes makes a big difference there.
#6
FishChaser
FishChaser's avatar
Debates: 109
Posts: 321
2
4
9
FishChaser's avatar
FishChaser
2
4
9
-->
@TheGreatSunGod
Women who marry for money and power are just using the guy. It isn't a desirable situation at all. The ideal relationship is one where the woman adores the guy completely and the guy appreciates her adoration completely. This can only be achieved when the woman sees the guy as 10/10 and sees herself as lower than him and inferior to him. Women in this day and age will spew a bunch of feminism crap meanwhile they don't actually respect men who they see as their equal, because they have an innate hypergamous drive that tells them to seek out the most superior mate possible.
Topic's author
#7
TheGreatSunGod
TheGreatSunGod's avatar
Debates: 27
Posts: 1,396
3
4
8
TheGreatSunGod's avatar
TheGreatSunGod
3
4
8
-->
@FishChaser
It isn't a desirable situation at all
If your goal is to have woman who adores you, then that is much much harder to achieve than simply getting a girlfriend.
Topic's author
#8
TheGreatSunGod
TheGreatSunGod's avatar
Debates: 27
Posts: 1,396
3
4
8
TheGreatSunGod's avatar
TheGreatSunGod
3
4
8
-->
@FishChaser
Still, these principles apply. Woman adores you more if you are not needy, if you are not giving her too much attention, if you are sovereign. In the end, why care about some specific woman if she doesnt care for you? Satanic law of "treat others as they treat you" may not be perfect, but it applies very well to situations like these. If woman doesnt care about you, dont care about her.
#9
FishChaser
FishChaser's avatar
Debates: 109
Posts: 321
2
4
9
FishChaser's avatar
FishChaser
2
4
9
-->
@TheGreatSunGod
Having a gf won't last or be fulfilling unless she adores you. I have a gf (surprising I know) and she is autistic and she loves me very much. I am telling you that I don't have to do anything but be myself because she sees me as a 10. I have tried all sorts of red pill game on all sorts of women and it never works because I'm not conventionally attractive. 90% of the battle is just being "her type" and for ALL neurotypical women the type is the same and chances are no one reading this is that type.

Many think their gf or wife loves them even though they aren't chads and aren't dating autistic women, these people with 100% certainty are simply unaware of the different levels of attraction and how differently she would treat certain guys who she probably thinks she wouldn't even be able to get with but would drop her panties for the second she has a chance.
Topic's author
#10
TheGreatSunGod
TheGreatSunGod's avatar
Debates: 27
Posts: 1,396
3
4
8
TheGreatSunGod's avatar
TheGreatSunGod
3
4
8
-->
@FishChaser
90% of the battle is just being "her type"
Sure, but its not the only thing which matters. If you are not someone's type, clearly one must rely on strategy, and if you are someone's type, strategy is still needed because it is unlikely that you are the only one who is her type there. There are of course different types of girls who want different things, but some strategy is usually needed because there could be other men who offer them more, or just do better power play.
Topic's author
#11
TheGreatSunGod
TheGreatSunGod's avatar
Debates: 27
Posts: 1,396
3
4
8
TheGreatSunGod's avatar
TheGreatSunGod
3
4
8
-->
@FishChaser
I have tried all sorts of red pill game on all sorts of women and it never works because I'm not conventionally attractive
You are competing with other men. The main problem is of course if some other men offer them more or at least chance for more.
#12
Savant
Savant's avatar
Debates: 25
Posts: 3,602
4
7
6
Savant's avatar
Savant
4
7
6
-->
@FishChaser
Women who marry for money and power are just using the guy.
Isn't it effectively the same with marrying for looks? They're using you for your appearance even though they don't care about your personality. At least money actually has a use outside of attracting women.
#13
FishChaser
FishChaser's avatar
Debates: 109
Posts: 321
2
4
9
FishChaser's avatar
FishChaser
2
4
9
-->
@TheGreatSunGod
The strategy is to find someone who sees you as 100% her type, that's literally it. Redpill stuff can only make a 5 into a 7 etc. If you aren't a woman's type at all she will NEVER like you.
#14
FishChaser
FishChaser's avatar
Debates: 109
Posts: 321
2
4
9
FishChaser's avatar
FishChaser
2
4
9
-->
@Savant
The physical attraction is a prerequisite for caring about your personality.
#15
Savant
Savant's avatar
Debates: 25
Posts: 3,602
4
7
6
Savant's avatar
Savant
4
7
6
-->
@FishChaser
The physical attraction is a prerequisite for caring about your personality.
And money and power aren't? Why not?
Topic's author
#16
TheGreatSunGod
TheGreatSunGod's avatar
Debates: 27
Posts: 1,396
3
4
8
TheGreatSunGod's avatar
TheGreatSunGod
3
4
8
-->
@FishChaser
The strategy is to find someone who sees you as 100% her type, that's literally it. Redpill stuff can only make a 5 into a 7 etc. If you aren't a woman's type at all she will NEVER like you.
But different strategies can increase number of people who see you as their type. Its not all about physical look, but that can be improved too.

#17
FishChaser
FishChaser's avatar
Debates: 109
Posts: 321
2
4
9
FishChaser's avatar
FishChaser
2
4
9
-->
@Savant
Because money hasn't existed long enough to play a part in how women's attraction instincts have evolved, and the alpha male is usually determined by which male is the largest for 99% of our evolutionary history. Women are attracted to genetics and value genetics, valuing your money isn't the same thing as valuing you but valuing your genes is synonymous with valuing you as a mate.
Topic's author
#18
TheGreatSunGod
TheGreatSunGod's avatar
Debates: 27
Posts: 1,396
3
4
8
TheGreatSunGod's avatar
TheGreatSunGod
3
4
8
-->
@Savant
And money and power aren't? Why not?
Women sometimes do actually prefer money and power over looks, especially if they get quality gifts like expensive chocolates often, and get new clothes, necklace...ect. Its about special things which money can buy. You dont give women money directly, but you buy stuff for them. Same with power too. You dont make women powerful, but you use your power to provide them. That way, they depend on you as provider.
#19
Savant
Savant's avatar
Debates: 25
Posts: 3,602
4
7
6
Savant's avatar
Savant
4
7
6
-->
@FishChaser
money hasn't existed long enough to play a part in how women's attraction instincts have evolved
Ok, by this logic no one should care about money at all because it hasn't been long around for us to evolve to care about it. Except we do, and some people are even gambling addicts, because we've evolved to the point where we can understand power even as an abstract concept and have a strong desire for it.

valuing your genes is synonymous with valuing you as a mate
Valuing you as a mate isn't the same as valuing you as a person. By the same token, valuing your money and power is synonymous with valuing you as a spouse.
#20
FishChaser
FishChaser's avatar
Debates: 109
Posts: 321
2
4
9
FishChaser's avatar
FishChaser
2
4
9
-->
@Savant
People value money as a means to access resources, this is different from evolving inherent mechanisms that trigger the desire to reproduce and be close to someone because they have money.

Would you rather have a wife that values you less as a mate but more as a person? That's called being friends, but do you REALLY believe that women value guys they see as friends more than guys she sees romantically?

Valuing you as a mate inherently means she cares about you more as a person.
#21
Savant
Savant's avatar
Debates: 25
Posts: 3,602
4
7
6
Savant's avatar
Savant
4
7
6
-->
@FishChaser
People value money as a means to access resources, this is different from evolving inherent mechanisms that trigger the desire to reproduce and be close to someone because they have money.
Ok, but they still value it. Evolutionarily, people value sex as a means to create offspring, but they still value sex. There are inherent mechanisms that make many women want to reproduce with someone powerful, it doesn't really matter the form the power takes.

do you REALLY believe that women value guys they see as friends more than guys she sees romantically?
People value family members more than the person they've been hooking up with for three months, so I imagine they'd value long-term friends more than that person as well.
#22
FishChaser
FishChaser's avatar
Debates: 109
Posts: 321
2
4
9
FishChaser's avatar
FishChaser
2
4
9
-->
@Savant
Power is different from money, there is more of an evolutionary basis for that but it still isn't on the same level. The irony is that financial success and being in positions of power seems to be related to being taller and more attractive. People just like you and respect you more in general when you are tall and handsome, so such people are more likely to be handed opportunities on a silver platter both professionally and in dating.


There are stories of women being more emotionally hurt by a FWB ghosting them than a relationship that lasted over a decade. Women's standards for hookups are actually higher than for long term relationships, as long term is usually settling for financial and emotional security whereas hooking up/FWB is usually being fuckzoned by the guy they wish they could date and are so attracted to him they are willing to settle for that over dating a less attractive guy.


#23
ADreamOfLiberty
ADreamOfLiberty's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,728
3
3
2
ADreamOfLiberty's avatar
ADreamOfLiberty
3
3
2
-->
@Savant
Ok, by this logic no one should care about money at all because it hasn't been long around for us to evolve to care about it. Except we do,
The development of abstract intelligence is not the most advantageous in any particular niche or ecosystem.

It is moderately advantages in all of them.

That is why it happened so many times.

The moment intelligence was sufficiently abstract to allow for transmitting knowledge culture was created selection of mutation became obsolete.

It still happens of course, but compared to the timescale of the selection of culture it may as well be frozen in time.



Anyone who talks about the evolution of man in the last fifty thousand years like it matters is ignorant of the dynamics. Hec, I doubt the evolution of dolphins is anything but cultural selection at this point.


Clarification: I do not mean that individuals of a certain culture are genetically predisposed to believe in and transmit that culture, and thus those genes become dominant. I mean that individuals of a certain culture are culturally predisposed to spread that culture. The culture has become the inheritable trait that reacts to changing conditions.

So, we care about money because that is what we learned to do; because that is what works in our culture. We are a species that constructs our behavior because abstract intelligence was the trait evolution gave us first and more than others. Now, in the blink of an eye, all fitness exists primarily in the context of our culture.

Crows are doing great for example, because they have culture and they have learned how to live among humans. Wheat is also doing great, because we like to eat it. Humanity was a singularity, it's all that matters now.

For humans to believe some minor variation in their genes from prehistory determines how they react to some thousand year old artifact of civilization is fully absurd.
#24
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 37
Posts: 8,161
3
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
9
Economical sovereignty
2. Philosophical mind
3. Physical strength
4. Never ever be needy
5. Have power
6. Control when you give your attention
Niggers have none of this things and still get laid and run around with 10 kids they don't take care of. 

Maybe physical strength . Your theory is wrong. For for somebody who is constantly thinking about how they can get sex from women, you sure are terrible at figuring out how. 


#25
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 37
Posts: 8,161
3
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
9
This is very simple. For example, if some girl wanted to be with you, she would do everything to make it happen. You wouldnt have to beg her. She wouldnt run to other men.
Sometimes men fuck the plain girl not because she was the hottest girl around, not because she was particularly special in anyway but because she happened to be around and he happened to have a hard dick. 

Just letting women know you would fuck them can often be all you need to be the make equivalent of the plain girl. This is why the cocky funny persona works so well.

#26
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 37
Posts: 8,161
3
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
9
-->
@Savant
@FishChaser
Savant is right. Money can be the foot in the door needed for women to love men as can physical attraction. It isn't enough to maintain that love, for that you need respect which requires you to be either the non chalant fuck boy or an alpha provider. The lawyer which is better for society and you're legacy and the former being superior for short sighted hedonists. I personally try to convince both. An understanding wife and side pieces, but to each their own.
Topic's author
#27
TheGreatSunGod
TheGreatSunGod's avatar
Debates: 27
Posts: 1,396
3
4
8
TheGreatSunGod's avatar
TheGreatSunGod
3
4
8
Sometimes men fuck the plain girl not because she was the hottest girl around, not because she was particularly special in anyway but because she happened to be around and he happened to have a hard dick.

Just letting women know you would fuck them can often be all you need to be the make equivalent of the plain girl. This is why the cocky funny persona works so well.
This is about getting a girlfriend specifically. Anyone can get laid by paying prostitute or just going to parties very often.
#28
yachilviveyachali
yachilviveyachali's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 160
0
2
3
yachilviveyachali's avatar
yachilviveyachali
0
2
3
-->
@TheGreatSunGod
I watched the video. What other pearls of wisdom will this AI channel from Nepal bestow on us? 

“He competes for scraps of validation from women who will never commit to him.” 

Is this not also true of women who put themselves on the internet, go to nightclubs, and seek attention from men?

Men and women seem very confused. It seems they think dating is a good and normal thing to do; it isn't. They should seek marriage and permanency from the time they are youths and stick to it. 
Topic's author
#29
TheGreatSunGod
TheGreatSunGod's avatar
Debates: 27
Posts: 1,396
3
4
8
TheGreatSunGod's avatar
TheGreatSunGod
3
4
8
It seems they think dating is a good and normal thing to do; it isn't. They should seek marriage and permanency from the time they are youths and stick to it. 
I agree that person should seek marriage first. Its just that today, most people want to date for a long time before marriage. If it was some innocent dating, maybe it wouldnt be even bad. But yeah, they are having sex with multiple people before any marriage. And when they marry, they divorce.
Topic's author
#30
TheGreatSunGod
TheGreatSunGod's avatar
Debates: 27
Posts: 1,396
3
4
8
TheGreatSunGod's avatar
TheGreatSunGod
3
4
8
-->
@yachilviveyachali
Forgot to tag, sorry.