Want girlfriend?

Author: TheGreatSunGod

Posts

Total: 36
AdaptableRatman
AdaptableRatman's avatar
Debates: 10
Posts: 1,018
3
3
7
AdaptableRatman's avatar
AdaptableRatman
3
3
7
Black pill isn't blue pill.

Let's leave that there.

All pills are wrong but blue and red are least wrong for differing reasons.

Black pill says all women and men for that matter have identical standards and genetics plus luck determine one's ability to not only find love but enjoy and be fulfilled in life. This is why the community is full of self loathing people even if said people happen to get action.

Red pill frames a system where higher value women have higher standards and higher value men do too. Red pill struggles not because it doesn't make sense but because it forgets different people value the same teaits/things differently. It forgets that literally what is 6 in one's eyes is 10 in another's.

Blue pill is rooted in Pagan/folklore soulmate theory. It states that every single person has the ideal partner out there that will find him/her ideal and your entire life is meant to be rejecting every good option  ecause better exists and you will know it when you find it as this person will like you unedited so much.

The Catholic take is the reality. It is a bit of purple really. It even includes the tiniest pinch of black pill.

I call it Cath pill.

The Cath pill is as follows:

  • The purpose of all sex and marriage in human 'species' aka humankind is 2fold unlike most species of lesser animal/creature where it is 1fold. It is not solely to procreate but also to bond and keep the parenting couple very bonded.
  • This means impotency and IVF methods already run against God's plan for sex. Maybe they work out but the impotent in God's plan will probably find they are more fulfilled being celibate and serving others in a different way than being a parent.
  • There are others that don't suit marriage and parenting at all. These same people due to God's plan and the logic/rules God supplied us mean they automatically won't make good spouses and should avoid sex altogether unless they recover from the psychological, financial or physical ailments (spiritual is a given, you need to have a god relationship with God no matter what)
  • Once you see relationships this way, not only do you brag far less when having them but it is far more chill. Friendzone becomes the standard zone. You are 2 people pledging loyalty to procreate and parent until death of either do you part. This unison is not based on the other completing you. It is based on teamwork, friendship and a united goal under God.
  • Nearly all other faiths, so not atheists alone but all other faithful people, pressure and bully their children, relatives and friends if they don't get married fast or don't rear kids. Even Protestants ridicule not getting laid in itself. This attitude gaslights the holy ones to feel they are inferior, broken or wrong for staying chaste and humble. It helps sexual degenerates feel good.

Once you grasp all those elements of Cath pill, you will reach the following conclusion:
  • Naturally, the further from the correct God-given way of viewing sex and spousal relationships one goes, the more immoral and superficial both genders become in the entire 'dating scene' (more like hookup scene). The entire construct in fact becomes so deeply depraved that partners guilt trip each other with gaslighting remarks that make the other feel bad for asking 'are we serious?' 'what are we?' 'are we official?' it also leads to issues of apparent queer-friendliness resulting in 'partner' whatever that means. So now, women feel awkard saying boyfriend or even husband, they say 'partner' choke a bit and say na that is just my friend I have some sex with wink wink. The scene is inherently corrupt because it doesn't push monogamy and fidelity as severely important values, let alone chastity prior to marriage.

AdaptableRatman
AdaptableRatman's avatar
Debates: 10
Posts: 1,018
3
3
7
AdaptableRatman's avatar
AdaptableRatman
3
3
7
-->
@yachilviveyachali
Agreed 100%.

Dating should be a courtship period pre marriage.
Savant
Savant's avatar
Debates: 25
Posts: 3,601
4
7
6
Savant's avatar
Savant
4
7
6
-->
@FishChaser
Power is different from money, there is more of an evolutionary basis for that but it still isn't on the same level.
But there's still an evolutionary basis for both. That's why women are attracted to strength...because it's a source of power. We've evolved to the point where women can be attracted to power in other forms because the human brain understands how power works. Humans pursue power even in abstract forms.

There are stories of women being more emotionally hurt by a FWB ghosting them than a relationship that lasted over a decade.
Maybe, but it's probably not the norm.

as long term is usually settling for financial and emotional security
Call it settling if you want, but women choosing financial and emotional security would be evidence that they do in fact value those things. You could just as easily say that women who choose attractive but incompatible men are settling for good sex even though their personalities don't get along well.
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 13,505
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@TheGreatSunGod
True goals.

1. Evolution

2. Temporary survival.

3. Sex 

4. Procreation.

Intellect means that innate messages  get more and more obscured by conceptual fluff.

Hence for example, same sex and more elaborate role playing become viable and temporarily important options.

But if that is what it takes to get to where we don't know where, then so be it.

Just enjoy the ride for a few short universal moments.
MayCaesar
MayCaesar's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 14
0
0
2
MayCaesar's avatar
MayCaesar
0
0
2
I have never understood all these claims on the Internet that women are looking for some specific qualities in men. Observing a large variety of couples, I can very confidently say that there is no such thing as "women want X". All that needs to happen for two people to get together is them being physically attracted to each other and having many similar values and interests. Heck, I knew a couple in which both did full time van-living: no money, no interest in intellectual pursuits, nothing. They met at some random campsite and decided to travel together for a bit, and the rest is history.

People who make "finding a girlfriend" into some kind of science are way overthinking it. People have been meeting each other and falling in love for millennia without any strategies or tricks. The problem today is that a lot of people have extremely poor social skills by nature of being surrounded by technology and living in virtual worlds, so for them finding a "real girlfriend" or a "real boyfriend" sounds like some kind of a fantasy story... But just going outside and starting to socialize will teach anyone quickly that members of the opposite sex are the same walking mammals as them and there is nothing special about forming romantic relationships with them.

Look around. People of all kinds are married and have kids: extremely obese people, extremely short people, extremely poor people, extremely sick people, even people in prisons... You do not need to have a 6-pack, or cite Plato frequently, or have a billion in the bank to find your special one. What you do need is to clear the rubble that the virtual space fills people's minds with and go out there in the world and meet new people, one of which will be the one.
TheGreatSunGod
TheGreatSunGod's avatar
Debates: 27
Posts: 1,396
3
4
8
TheGreatSunGod's avatar
TheGreatSunGod
3
4
8
-->
@MayCaesar
True.