My New Position On Some Issues Such As Gay Marriage

Here is an updated list of my positions now:

Circumcision - strongly against

I was always against circumcision, and this didnt change.

Abortion - strongly against

Abortion is murder, and cannot be justified logically.

Gay marriage - against

There is no point in encouraging homosexuality further, because gay people cant reproduce with each other. They caused drop in birth rates.

Trans - semi against

I am against children getting any kind of surgeries regarding this, but okay with them wearing clothes they want now.

Contraception - strongly against

If you want to fix birth rates, must ban these.

Family values - strongly Pro

Family is most important for future generations, and complete family with man and woman is best.

lol

TheGreatSunGod doesn't have positions, he has superpositions.

I also have many religions too. My mind is capable of supporting many contradicting positions by dividing itself on parts which support one position and parts which support other position.

I consider life more like a game, and I like trying different characters.

You’ve just exhibited misunderstanding of superstition. It is not stupidity, it is belief that the supernatural, fate, or magic has influence resulting in fear of the unknown, or ignorance of what is known. Ignorance can be overcome by education, and fear is overcome by continued education and employing that education to become proficient, then express excellence in proficiency. Now do you get it? Do not stop learning. Education is a lifelong endeavor.

Importantly, the state of superposition can be maintained only while a quantum system is unobserved. Once measured, the wave function of a quantum system in a state of superposition "collapses" into one of the basis states. For a concrete example of how this might work if superposition could exist in the everyday world, imagine that a coin that is flipped and lands on a table. In classical mechanics -- and in the everyday world as we know it -- the coin ends up in a state of either heads or tails. In a quantum mechanical system, the coin could be both heads and tails at the same time, but only until someone or something observes it or measures it. In this analogy, once observed, the coin would take on the state of either heads or tails. 

Did you hear my debate on homosexuality being a disorder?

The Holy Spirit is working within you. Over time you shall come to the true faith. 🙏🤍🕊️

superposition, not superstition

The comedy couldn't be better if it was planned.

 I thought that was a typo. Never heard of "superposition," and, according to Google, no wonder. IT says in its A.I.-driven "overview: "Quantum superposition is a fundamental principle of quantum mechanics that states that linear combinations of solutions to the Schrödinger equation are also solutions of the Schrödinger equation. "

That is what's called a circular logic, and why I have abandoned Google due to its AI dependence. A = artificial. It sure is.

The DuckDuck search engine makes much more sense: "In physics and systems theory, the superposition principle, also known as superposition property, states that, for all linear systems, the net response caused by two or more stimuli is the sum of the responses that would have been caused by each stimulus individually."

Still amused?

The same phenomenon exists with ordinary observation of ordinary nature to "prove" base science, let alone quantum science. Observation alters the nature of nature by the presence of the  observer, even if the "observer" is a mechanical device.

You have successfully extended my amusement with by being pouty at three different definitions from fake AI.

If a tree falls in the forest, did the ground observe it hit?

All "if/then logic" isn't, simply because whatever follows "if" is not currently true, and will not be true until "if," whatever it is, is altered, and thus, cannot justify "then," regardless of what is claimed as "then," even when "then" is not identified by such a moniker, but is merely a statement of result. Glad you're amused.

I thought I had seen the most pseudo intellectual thing that could exist on the internet. I was wrong.

LOL

I sometimes wonder if BK drinks too much Holy Spirit.

And the more I hear from the born again Catholic and the reinvented Sungod, the more I'm inclined to think, that the pair of you are just having a laugh.

The tactic of personal attack is the most immediate loss of argument there is, for you exhibit no other more topical argument, making my rebuttal much easier:  We're done.

I dont get drunk

I dont get high

I just tell atheists

Who hate God

To look around

In you its found

Your God made you

Do you ask why

I do laugh at times, my relationship with God has given me deep joy.

I am a product of the Universe, wherein I continually promote the GOD principle.

Though the GOD principle is not a magical mystery man who was made up by ignorant folk in the Middle East a few thousand years.

I also promote the idea of a universal super-intelligence that instigated evolution on Planet Earth many billions of years ago.

Though a universal super-intelligence doesn't necessarily have a beard and wear sandals...But you never know.

Hey, maybe he was cruising past one day, got a bit horny, and found himself a cute Judean babe for the night.

I can also run with the idea of purposelessness.

I don't know the answer and neither do you or the Ratman.

Some might construe laughing at ones own jokes as being a tad narcissistic.

But I wouldn't dream of doing so.

I know the answer now. Gods exist.

Either Catholicism is true, EO is true, OO is true, Sunni Islam is true or Shi'ite (Shia) Islam is true.

Logically based on the ultimate fact of monotheism and the over the top racism of modern Judaism, either Christianity or Islam is true.

If Christianity is true, only the OG churches from Jesus and the Apostles can be valid.

I do not 100% know it is not Allah, I know very high percent based on my life and certain logical things.

What I know is it is one or the other.

What are my own jokes? I said my relationship with God.

Nope, you've decided to say that a GOD exists.

Which doesn't prove that a GOD actually exists.

Just substitute the word GOD with Pink Elephant ...Et voila, a Pink Elephant exists.

It was a joke.

No it was not.

Judaists, Islamists and Christians all adapt their idea of GOD from the same premise, so it's essentially the same idea and the same GOD.

The only difference is in the ritual.

Though no version is likely to be accurately representative of the truth surrounding creation and existence.