So when you run around ridiculing black people, using N word and saying they never ever contributed a lot to science that is not racist?
Whereas when I go no, some did but here is why it has wound up being less common for them to excel at it, that is more vindictive?
My statements are generalizations and do not contradict your statement that it was less common due to the racism of the time or lack of opportunities given the environment many found themselves in. You use rhetoric that is less offensive but they both mean the same thing.
There is literally no difference between the following two statements
1. Niggers commit a lot of crime
2. due to high levels of poverty and the mentality of many black people who see a lack of opportunity, crime is often seen as a reasonable option.
Both statements also lead to the same conclusion. We need to create opportunity for these populations and create environments that foster hope and reward good citizenship. Like I said both statements mean exactly the same thing.
Why do you reply to several messages and only choose 3 sentences maxinum each time to reply to rather than the core of what I said and clarify your own stance.
Yes sorry about that. When I do that I am hoping I am addressing the core of what you are saying and not tidbits that are irrelevant. The truth is my time is extremely limited. I am moving, doing college at least 5 hours a day and working about 10 hours a day. I was just in the comment section of a debate where somebody was writing 10k word essays complete with APA citations and things like that are just too much to keep up with. I will see if I can come up with a way to be more thorough so I am not disrespecting the conversation