leshwanda was wrongfully banned.

LOL, if you think Leshwanda was not a troll, then you should be glad you can't be banned for being stupid.

You call me stupid, but you overestimate me.

If you think you can convince us that Lashwanda was a noble Black Woman, then you are calling us stupid.

Also why would you care more about the sincerity of an argument than it being factually accurate?

You think the N word is OK, but not the word cracker?

The part where blackface trolls are gonna help us save lost souls is monkey shit.

The part where blackface trolls are gonna help us save lost souls is monkey shit.

Wouldn't you agree that the rich looked down on the poor somewhere in the world in the 15th century?

Okay probably. Looking down on somebody isn't an insult. You may want to look at the definition 

I don't think you understand the mindset of the slave, which did exist in the 15th century. I don't think u know how slaves feel if you say no one was insulted centuries ago 

You don't either. You were never a slave in the 15th century. I do know many slaves voluntarily died protecting their masters or commited suicide out of grief when a long time master died

I do know many slaves voluntarily died protecting their masters or commited suicide out of grief when a long time master died

Insult means a word directed towards a person meant to offend. So know attacking somebody would not be an insult it would be a physical attack and those are banned here but don't fall under the definition 

It's probable that someone would feel insulted because they are being treated in a demeaning manner because of their social status, right? 

So you don't think someone can be insulted by receiving a slap on the face?

Insults can be subject to a person feelings.

Insults do not only originate from verbal abuse

So you don't think someone can be insulted by receiving a slap on the face?

Sure he can feel insulted but the slap is not in and of itself an insult. He would have to call him a name when he slapped for it to be considered an insult. 

You can feel insulted if somebody isn't responding to you or if they blocked you, but we aren't going to seek to ban all things that are insulting as that would be retarded. The only aim is to ban insults. 

Ban insults not what is insulting. 

Insults can be subject to a person feelings.

Insults do not only originate from verbal abuse

You are confusing two different terms that are spelled the same way with similar meanings. I am not sure why you are being obtuse but do you propose banning all things that could make a person feel "insulted" ? 

I am insulted by you questioning me. 

You see how someone can feel insulted despite the definition of insult in this context meaning name calling?

Further more an insult if we really want to nail it down santically is a derogatory term directed at somebody, where the term lacks any premise accompanying the statement.

So I thought you were saying that if we can insults than it involves banning things that are insulting. What are you saying?

Name-calling is one way to insult someone 

Name-calling is one way to insult someone 

In this context it is the only way. I think you are claiming because the word has multiple definitions that all the definitions are intended for it despite context. 

I am a native English speaker BTW and I am telling you that context is important for knowing which definition of a term is used and when you look in dictionaries it is not too uncommon to see multiple definitions for each word, may times even meaning wildly different things. 

Like even can mean 2 4 6 etc. 

But it can also mean "same amount"

For the definition of insult I was using it wouldn't work but for some irrelevant and other definition of insult than yes but it's usually going to be followed by an "ing" or "Ed" in those contexts.