-->
@Lunatic
My argument has been consistent since I initially called you out for it in 232. Mikal has issues with something else than me entirely. I don't even necessarily get mikals full argument."Going to redo this because I got a mod clarification. I have no identifier and apparently I read this wrong. So my item does not have a category period. In the pm it was looked like 2 words when it really should’ve been 1. So no I have 0 sub category"I asked you how you read your PM wrong and you said:"I didn’t read it wrong. My role should’ve been 1 word, not 2. I was confused cuz the wiki showed 1 but the PM showed 2. I asked a question and got a clarification. Didn’t read this wrong"I don't understand why you are using the wiki instead of just reading from your role PM.
The more I think about this the less sense it makes. What's the claim here? That scum were given three fake roles and fake claims and that Supa, a player who, from what I gather, is notorious for being unable to keep his story straight as scum or town, decides 'instead of taking one of these fake claims that are guaranteed to work, I'm going to invent my own fake claim?' Yeah, there's several reasons to make up your own fake claim outside of the ones your given, but none of them that I can think of end with you claiming vanilla. Can you think of a case where you would take that additional risk and what you get in return is that any night actions become more suspicious? The whole motivation doesn't make sense from a scum perspective. Lying about mod feedback is what sold me on the lynch, but now that that's 'deconfirmed' there's not a whole lot there really.