From your first link -
"Requesting asylum requires
a person to be physically present in the United States, but it also involves presenting oneself to law enforcement and government officials, meaning the goal in those cases would not be to deceive or defraud the U.S. government but rather to work within the existing system."
From your second link -
"Catholic Legal Immigration Network, Inc. and the American Immigration Council. Guess who’s funding them? … none other than radical leftist billionaire: George Soros."
Your logical fallacy is - the genetic fallacy.
So first you scare-monger. MURDER-HUNGRY-RABID-DRUG-DEALING-FENCE-JUMPING-CRIMINAL-BAD-HOMBRES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Then when that turns out to be PROVABLY FALSE (undocumented immigrants are statistically LESS likely to be criminals than native born citizens) THEN you demonize and dehumanize LEGAL refugees seeking LEGAL asylum by accusing them of being pawns of some presumably purely evil benefactor.
(IFF) George Soros has committed a crime (THEN) charge him with a crime.
(IFF) George Soros (or anyone else for that matter) chooses to spend money to assist LEGAL refugees seeking LEGAL asylum, then that is their god given right.
And by the way - the "black hate groups" quote is FALSE according to your already cited snopes. [LINK]
how far could you carry a child with not money and whatever food and water you could also carry?
This question is nonsensical. People can scavenge for or beg for food and water. They are hiking through Mexico, not the Sahara.