Making a debate telling me I can't accept

Author: RationalMadman ,

Posts

Total: 11
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 352
Posts: 11,318
10
10
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
10
11
This is getting to a stage where we need to ask ourselves if this is okay. If it becomes acceptable to do what speedrace is doing then I will do the same and make really stupid debates and rule out all good debaters on the site, gambling on a noob accepting it.
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 352
Posts: 11,318
10
10
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
10
11
--> @bsh1 @David
If this is seriously to be upheld in votes I want it to be concrete CoC so I can manipulate my descriptions.
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 352
Posts: 11,318
10
10
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
10
11
So, speedrace, tell us all why you don't want me to accept your debates. 

TheRealNihilist
TheRealNihilist's avatar
Debates: 44
Posts: 4,912
4
9
11
TheRealNihilist's avatar
TheRealNihilist
4
9
11
Go right ahead until the moderators say no. 
It depends on the reason Speedrace gives as well. 
Ramshutu
Ramshutu's avatar
Debates: 42
Posts: 2,014
6
9
10
Ramshutu's avatar
Ramshutu
6
9
10
--> @RationalMadman

If the rules of the debate are unfair, they can be challenged in the debate. If you feel it is unfair that speedrace unfairly excludes you; you can wrap this into a kritik of the debate rules, provided you can show a clear harm in voters accepting the rules as they are - and your opponent isn’t able to invalidate it: I would not penalize you for accepting the debate.

The debate above is where I have done just that, and is an excellent example of the rules being challenged.

If you’re unable to show a clear harm in the rule; then in the words of Mr T, quit yo jibber jabber, fool.
The 
Speedrace
Speedrace's avatar
Debates: 63
Posts: 6,214
4
9
11
Speedrace's avatar
Speedrace
4
9
11
--> @Ramshutu
Blocking someone is supposed to prevent them from accepting your debates, they're working on it to make it do that, but for now, doing this simulates that
bsh1
bsh1's avatar
Debates: 14
Posts: 2,589
5
5
8
bsh1's avatar
bsh1
5
5
8
--> @RationalMadman
Rules which exclude certain people from accepting or voting on a debate are not enforced by moderation. If voters wish to enforce those rules, they may, but moderation will not. This does not apply to situations where restraining orders or harassment issues are at play.
Speedrace
Speedrace's avatar
Debates: 63
Posts: 6,214
4
9
11
Speedrace's avatar
Speedrace
4
9
11
--> @bsh1
So if I clarify and say it’s because he’s been harassing me by scooping up all of my challenges and preventing me from debating anyone else, will it be ok?
bsh1
bsh1's avatar
Debates: 14
Posts: 2,589
5
5
8
bsh1's avatar
bsh1
5
5
8
--> @Speedrace
You would need moderation to make a prior judgement deciding that there were valid concerns on your part regarding harassment. To do that, you would need to contact me via PM to discuss the issue. Until such time as such a judgement was rendered, moderation would not enforce any rule prohibiting another user from accepting your debate.
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 352
Posts: 11,318
10
10
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
10
11
Harassing you by scooping up all your challenges? xD I have debated you three times out of like 21? 
NoodIe
NoodIe's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 33
0
0
2
NoodIe's avatar
NoodIe
0
0
2
--> @RationalMadman
Harassing you by scooping up all your challenges? xD I have debated you three times out of like 21? 
You dick. shame. shame. shame