I'm only responding to you once, because you seem to have strong biases and that is utterly annoying and impossible to argue with in any intellectual sense.
Your a hypocrite. Asked him for evidence for spirituality could not give it then implies I am lying about what I think I am. Problem here is that what I am asking is not difficult for someone to prove gravity is real but guess you can't do that for spirituality. Yes it is utterly and impossible to argue with someone with strong biases. I really understand how you feel more than you even know.
This is where your ignorance shines so bright, the argument for God is as good as any and always will be, perhaps much more applicable and plausible than any materialistic approach. The reason you can't see that is somewhat disappointing but not surprising. It's actually the norm, are you content with that?
Just like your argument for spirituality. Non-existent. Shame really thought I was going to read an actual argument for God. Guess having irrational beliefs really does lead a person susceptible to other irrational beliefs.
Where did they fail when you consider the nature of God and how long religion has been available lol?? the funny part is, is that the proof of God's existence has been shown many times over through spirituality yet you sit like a dum dum waiting for some ignorant scientists to give you answers when it's already been made known. You just think you are somehow above the evidence. The evidence however slaps you in the face cold. Ever thought about that?
Guess you are using a butchered form of evidence where just because you feel something is right therefore it must be the case. Spirituality and God have yet to be consistent with any metric apart from the metric of non-existence. Praying doesn't work. No link between some-kind of immaterial object like God or spirituality in the material world. Guess people are going to stick to their irrational beleifs and lie to themselves about "evidence" as if they know the meaning of it.
Give me a good example of that atheist. All I hear are strawmen and dishonest assumptions.
I'll give it as an individual not some sort of representatives to all atheists.
1)KCA concludes by saying there is a cause for the universe. Nothing in the argument that can provide an argument for God. So basically they would need an additional argument for God's existence.
2)Moral argument falls flat when there is no objective morality or if you don't believe that then there is no way you a theist can prove it.
3)Creatio ex nihilo has never occured.
4)Cause and effect is not an argument for God because God would also require cause. If not then the person is committing a special pleading fallacy.
Here have shown how 4 arguments are false. Not really too much detail but I don't think you care because of your biases and how little you care about rationality when you have irrational beliefs about spirituality.
It is dishonest for you to go for fringe elements of a group and not target people who make good arguments. The people who make good arguments against God would not be straw-manning. I could tell you who they are but I am capable of making those arguments so I don't see the point of giving someone that comes to mind.
So in other words you have counted out God, because the arguments are in favor of the nature of God presented as evidence. So much so it's almost impossible to ignore the evidence unless you are a biased troll. There's more testimonial evidence for the paranormal and God than for any other topic.
"testimonial" evidence. Now I understand how you got to where you are due to my encounter with you with spirituality but guess I forgot that irrational beliefs leaves people susceptible to other irrational beliefs. I could have guessed that because theists are not really original when it comes to butchering what evidence is. I think you are completely irrational. To the point where you actually think I am a "biased troll" and thinking "testimonial" evidence is somehow good evidence. It is a shame how indoctrination made you irrational or maybe you are just st*pid. Talking to you would be more fruitful if you did can make a substantial argument but as this has shown. You have shown two times where you are unable to make a rational argument.