Auto Voting Bans

Author: Speedrace ,

Posts

Total: 13
Speedrace
Speedrace's avatar
Debates: 63
Posts: 6,215
4
9
11
Speedrace's avatar
Speedrace
4
9
11
Why doesn't the website automatically stop people who've done less than 2 non-troll debates from voting?
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 370
Posts: 13,212
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
--> @Speedrace
Lack of coding expertise.
Speedrace
Speedrace's avatar
Debates: 63
Posts: 6,215
4
9
11
Speedrace's avatar
Speedrace
4
9
11
Sad lol
DebateArt.com
DebateArt.com's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,286
3
3
8
DebateArt.com's avatar
DebateArt.com
3
3
8
--> @Speedrace
Oh for God's sake, it's not there because initially we didn't have enough people for it to make sense to be implemented, now it makes sense since we already have lots of people with finished debates and I will add it sooner or later. I can't work on this stuff all my free time so things take time. I can't even get people to donate 30$ to cover the hosting expenses so cut me some slack here.
Speedrace
Speedrace's avatar
Debates: 63
Posts: 6,215
4
9
11
Speedrace's avatar
Speedrace
4
9
11
--> @DebateArt.com
I didn't mean to insult you or anything and I wasn't asking for it to be implemented...you could try opening a GitHub so people can submit code though, I might be able to help :D
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 370
Posts: 13,212
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
--> @DebateArt.com
I didn't mean to insult you, I just meant the true reason is not something to laugh at, coding is very complex so what is the point of being ashamed in not knowing a particular part of it?

One thing to bear in mind is when you code this make it 'naked'. Don't make it hidden, the new user should know they can't vote so they don't write an entire RFD and then realise it was all for nothing post-writing.
DebateArt.com
DebateArt.com's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,286
3
3
8
DebateArt.com's avatar
DebateArt.com
3
3
8
--> @Speedrace
My apologies, my rant was more towards RM and his logic.
DebateArt.com
DebateArt.com's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,286
3
3
8
DebateArt.com's avatar
DebateArt.com
3
3
8
--> @RationalMadman
It's a trivial thing to implement, I am sure I can handle it :/
Ramshutu
Ramshutu's avatar
Debates: 43
Posts: 2,369
6
9
10
Ramshutu's avatar
Ramshutu
6
9
10
--> @DebateArt.com
You need to implement this: (please excuse the c++)

Class Haters : public Object

public:
    virtual Go(  Object* obj )
    {
        Obj->Fuck();
    }
}


void TestUser( Object* user )
{
   Hater* hater( dynamic_cast<Hater*>(user) );

   if(hater)
   {
       hater->Go(hater);
   }
}
DebateArt.com
DebateArt.com's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,286
3
3
8
DebateArt.com's avatar
DebateArt.com
3
3
8
--> @Ramshutu
Haha I knew it was easy lol
David
David's avatar
Debates: 85
Posts: 1,208
4
7
10
David's avatar
David
4
7
10
--> @DebateArt.com
Did you get it implimented? 
DebateArt.com
DebateArt.com's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,286
3
3
8
DebateArt.com's avatar
DebateArt.com
3
3
8
--> @David
No, not yet but soon
Speedrace
Speedrace's avatar
Debates: 63
Posts: 6,215
4
9
11
Speedrace's avatar
Speedrace
4
9
11
--> @DebateArt.com
That's why I was laughing because it seemed to easy, good thing you're the owner lol :D