I support nuclear power. It is cheaper and kills less people then most to all forms of electricity and it is available year round even when it's night or not windy, so no batteries needed.
Nuclear power is awesome.
Topic's posts
Posts in total:
52
-
-
--> @AlecIndeed, it save lives in the case of WW2, legit my uncle did a paper on why nuking Japan was better than the alternative and the teacher failed him!
-
--> @Dr.FranklinThe first nuke on Japan was necessary,but the second one seemed a little excessive.
-
--> @DarthVader1Nuclear power gradually depletes the number of nuclear bombs that exist because the bombs are used as fuel.
-
--> @AlecThat's certainly a nice thing.
-
Guess you haven't watched Chernobyl
-
--> @AlecWhere the fuk did you get that fairytale?
-
--> @Polytheist-WitchIncluding Chernobyl related deaths, the death rate from nuclear power is still less then most to all alternative forms of electricity. It certainly beats solar.
-
--> @disgustedWhere the fuk did you get that fairytale?It's background knowledge.
-
America cannot be like the French though.
-
--> @AlecThere are better things to try then radiation that destroys the people and place. Three Mile Island cost over a billion to clean up in the 1990's. Wind and water, geothermal are all better than solar too but let's go with the most toxic alternative.
-
--> @Polytheist-WitchThere are better things to try then radiation that destroys the people and place.It's done in a safe way and the radiation is kept away from people.Three Mile Island cost over a billion to clean up in the 1990'sIt saved way more then that in electricity costs. If done in a rural area, then if it does explode, then very few people die.
-
--> @AlecYou can use the energy surplus to generate hydrogen, which can then be transported for general use in fuel cells.
-
--> @AlecFuck the Earth then. Who needs it.
-
--> @AlecThousands of people die in coal mines every year. Even more die from air pollution, much more deaths than from simple global warming where you can simply relocate to a better climate. Many people also die from LNG extractions as well, even though it burns cleanly.While coal will never be obsolete as we need it to make steel and other things and you can't generate the heat you need from solar, Nuclear power can save lives today by replacing many coal and gas power plants. Not a single person died from 3 mile island, but the coal plants the sensational media event helped to create ended up killing millions.
-
--> @AlecWhere the fuk did you get that fairytale?It's got absolutely nothing to do with knowledge.
-
--> @GreyparrotWe going to pretend anyone cares about coal miners? LOL
-
--> @Polytheist-WitchYeah, they are deplorable. I forgot.
-
--> @Greyparrotlol, were deplorables ok nice gross generalization Hillary Clinton
-
--> @AlecThere’s not really a safety issue with Nuclear at all; its expensive and wipes out a lot of land for a long time; but major events are rare and don’t kill many people. Deaths are only higher for solar as solar deaths normally include people falling off roofs, so it’s not a fully fair comparison.What the main financial issue is that the cost of Nuclear is somewhat hidden as from what I’m aware the recorded cost mostly doesn’t take into account major costs of big nuclear disasters. Worse, it’s not actually that cheap, it’s possible to build nuclear plants today; part of the issue is not all down to lack of will to build, but they’re not actually particularly economical - it’s why there are often large tax incentives and subsidies to allow for them. With massive cost overruns, it’s not often clear what the true cost of Nuclear actually is.You have issues with FBRs being too far out to be economical, and needing much more investment in research to be mainstream, without them, burn up rates mean that Uranium supply is problematic for a major ramp up in nuclear power. While former nuclear weapon material can be used in reactors, this is lot a long term strategy.I don’t think any plants need to be shut down now; even RBMKs are safeness now: but I think I question the long term economics of nuclear power given how drastically the price of renewables has been falling.
-
--> @Dr.FranklinAt least I got hotsauce in mah bag.
-
--> @GreyparrotNice argument! You have destroyed ME I HAVE GOTTEN OWNED OMG.I’d give you a nasty look but you’ve already got one.
If you’re going to be two-faced, at least make one of them pretty.
I love what you’ve done with your hair. How do you get it to come out of the nostrils like that?
If laughter is the best medicine, your face must be curing the world.
The only way you’ll ever get laid is if you crawl up a chicken’s ass and wait.
It looks like your face caught fire and someone tried to put it out with a hammer.
If I wanted a bitch, I’d have bought a dog.
I’d like to see things from your point of view, but I can’t seem to get my head that far up your ass.
I’ve seen people like you before, but I had to pay admission.
Scientists say the universe is made up of neutrons, protons and electrons. They forgot to mention morons.
You’re so fat you could sell shade.
Why is it acceptable for you to be an idiot but not for me to point it out?
Your lips keep moving but all I hear is “Blah, blah, blah.”
Your family tree must be a cactus because everyone on it is a prick.
You’ll never be the man your mother is.
Did you know they used to be called “Jumpolines” until your mum jumped on one?
Just because you have one doesn’t mean you need to act like one.
I’m sorry, was I meant to be offended? The only thing offending me is your face.
Someday you’ll go far… and I hope you stay there.
Which sexual position produces the ugliest children? Ask your mother.
Stupidity’s not a crime, so you’re free to go.
If I had a face like yours I’d sue my parents.
Your doctor called with your colonoscopy results. Good news – they found your head.
No, those pants don’t make you look fatter – how could they?
What’s the difference between your girlfriend and a walrus? One has a moustache and smells of fish and the other is a walrus.
Save your breath – you’ll need it to blow up your date.
You’re not stupid; you just have bad luck when thinking. -
--> @RamshutuConsidering the safety record of plants built in the 60's and the 70's...it's clear that the NRC today has much more costly regulations in place for new construction that probably are not warranted. And they are not as subsidized as you might think considering the voter pushback due to media frenzy on the fake dangers of Nuclear plants. Solar get far more subsidies even though the waste from solar panels are far more toxic in volume and far less controllable than the relatively small volumes of Nwaste.
-
--> @Dr.Franklin
-
--> @Greyparrotum......ok