-->
@Dr.Franklin
He's levelling up his necromancy skill
Liberals are stupid
Posts
Total:
237
-->
@dustryder
what a legend
-->
@Dr.Franklin
dude, please never make a thread like this again. It doesn't move the conversation anywhere; it only starts a flame war.
-->
@Mharman
Yeah, this was a while back
10 days later
-->
@Dr.Franklin
Why are you reviving all of my old threads
Because they are interesting, and to get 100 posts so I can vote in debates.
And so, what dustryder said.
He's levelling up his necromancy skill
-->
@Christen
If you want 100 posts, make threads
-->
@Dr.Franklin
Women having a right to an abortion which before 6 months before the baby is sentient is their body is different from a person owning a gun which isn't their own body.
This is a false equivalence fallacy.
I'm pro gun don't get me wrong however this is a very weak argument.
-->
@Mharman
Good one.dude, please never make a thread like this again. It doesn't move the conversation anywhere; it only starts a flame war.
-->
@Pinkfreud08
Its about the law
-->
@Dr.Franklin
Care to elaborate?
-->
@Pinkfreud08
Sure, banning something doesn't mean the stopping of something, so aborting and mass shootings are the same
-->
@Dr.Franklin
But again you're creating a false equivalence. A persons human rights to their body is different from a persons right to guns.
-->
@Pinkfreud08
so their both rights?
-->
@Dr.Franklin
One is a human right, the other is a legal right. If you honestly believe that guns are a human right than everyonw regardless of mental health should be allowed to own a gun. They aren't comparable.
-->
@Pinkfreud08
Human right for abortions, no no no no no
-->
@Dr.Franklin
Ok please elaborate
-->
@Pinkfreud08
Killing is not a right
-->
@Pinkfreud08
The procedure is shielded out of respect for the right to privacy.
-->
@Dr.Franklin
Even before the baby is sentient nor intelligent in any way? Ok so than what's the trait at which you value life?
-->
@Pinkfreud08
Right after conception, because it is a developing baby
-->
@Dr.Franklin
Alright so if that's the perimeter at which you value life than you'd have to value plants as they're conceptualized. Same with animals and dead bodies.
This is obviously extremely logically inconsistent.
Unless you're implying you only eat dead plants/animals and you are an advocate for dead bodies rights.
-->
@Snoopy
This is not an argument.
-->
@Pinkfreud08
Plants isnt humans
-->
@Dr.Franklin
Alright, so it seems your value on life is DNA structure.
Ok so hypothetically you'd be willing to justify the genocide of an alien species that were intelligent, sentient, had language and had the same societal norms as us.
Not to mention this would also mean that any other alien species could wipe us out and in your morality, it'd be justified since we're of different DNA structure.
-->
@Pinkfreud08
why did you jump to et
-->
@Dr.Franklin
Because that's what you're heavily implying.
-->
@Pinkfreud08
no, stick to the topic
-->
@Dr.Franklin
That is the topic. You're claiming that abortion is wrong because it's killing another being, I asked what's your trait that defines what you'd morally consider as a life, you state conception, I counter by stating that plants aren't sentient nor intelligent but are conceptualized, you state that you don't value them because they aren't human.
HEAVILY implying that DNA structure is your defining trait and not conception.
I countered by giving you hypothetical scenarios that highlight the errors in your moral system and am waiting for a response.