Mainly KJV, although other translations will be permissible if needed for further explanation, and we're focusing on the New Testament
A rejoinder is essentially a defense of your arguments, I can change the name to that if you want me to
Oh so Round 2 is rebuttals against your position and Round 3 is dedicated to me defending my position right?
No kritiks means don't challenge the topic itself, so like instead of saying it's a bad moral system, saying that there's no such thing as morality in the first place, or saying that Christianity is fake or something like that that challenges the topic itself instead of actually debating the topic
Time for arguments 1 week as well.
Don't like what you said here:
Secondly, there is no objective Christian standpoint, and what is truly taught for Christians should really be up for debate as well.
And can you clearly lay out what Pro and Con are doing.
Pro: Would need to do X
Con: Would need to do X
And state the burden of proof.