not anything; no single thing
I told you i didn't mean the literal definition of nothing. You know just as well that metaphysical conjecture uses words differently. I explained exactly what i meant in the analogies i provided. The infinite consciousness is everything without it having to be actualized. Therefore, technically there is nothing there "to see" ... until it manifests itself into becoming something. For instance, as an observer of the infinite sand you would say there is no sand castle if it isn't manifested. However, the sand castle exists within the sand... it just hasn't been actualized yet. Therefore, until it is actualized... from an observer perspective, you would see nothing there, but that doesn't mean it doesn't exist. Get it?
I never refuted this or the definition of consciousness. I am only saying that in the source state you are a different awareness or consciousness by being those two infinitely. Therefore, it really isn't existing when you know the beginning and end of every story. At least for me, that wouldn't be existing. I define existing as having an individual experience. Of course, you are still existing in general... as a different entity however that is all powerful. I find knowing everything to be a curse, and not truly existing. This is subjective i guess. Some may like that feeling. It's the same if i said i am not truly existing playing the piano... i feel like i am existing playing the drums. Same thing is what i mean.
None of what you wrote above have I said otherwise. Not sure how you didn't know that I believe in the projection of the soul, which is an individualized expression of the infinite. I thought we had that covered :(
I don't know. Then why did you refute when i explained first i become the source, and slowly wake up to being an individual source. I explained that source is your home, but you start to individualize "within the source or other" i'm not sure of that... but, individualize and then pick your next experience. You refuted that.
Then at this point I know you haven't even listened to what I've said, wow. I've said that over and over, that we are an individualization. How did you not know that?
You will have to explain again why you refuted what i said "you will be the source than your individualized source state." I thought you had agreed to the individualized state... but, i think we define it slightly different... i don't know. I don't have a great memory when it comes to specifics such as this... you just refuted so i am confused where you find it different than what i said.
I suspect you are misconstruing my use of the word waking up. What i mean is you become the source... everything. But before you pick your next experience, you individualize then decide from there. In other words,or my words, you wake up from being everything to you again before choosing the next experience you will have. I'm not sure about this... the source can very well dictate your next experience. However, i would rather it be an individual choice. And for it to be that, there needs to be another state where you individualize before manifesting into another vessel. That's what i mean.