Who beluieves that a "god" blew on clay and created man?

Author: disgusted ,

Posts

Total: 42
disgusted
disgusted's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,959
2
3
3
disgusted's avatar
disgusted
2
3
3
That's the question, have fun.
BrotherDThomas
BrotherDThomas's avatar
Debates: 2
Posts: 1,897
3
3
7
BrotherDThomas's avatar
BrotherDThomas
3
3
7
--> @disgusted



.
disgusted,

To completely understand your question, what does "beluieves" really mean because I couldn't find that word in the dictionary?

I got the second part of your question, "blew on clay and created man," which is biblically wrong, where we didn't expect a Hell bound Atheist like you to quote the Bible correctly, LOL!  Whereas this scenario is to be quoted as; "Then the LORD God formed a man from the dust of the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, and the man became a living being." (Genesis 2:7).

As you can see, your bible knowledge goes severely wanting once again in your embarrassment, this is because it was not clay, but dust, and where Jesus did not blow upon clay, but into the nostrils of man after he was formed from dust. It is beneficial for the Atheist to know what they are truly talking about before they need to remove one foot to insert the other, understood?

You are excused once again in total embarrassment, whereas when you admit to your ineptness regarding the Bible, and redo your statement to be correct, then TRUE Christians will address your post.


.




TheDredPriateRoberts
TheDredPriateRoberts's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 3,360
3
3
6
TheDredPriateRoberts's avatar
TheDredPriateRoberts
3
3
6
--> @disgusted
do you believe science, right now could make a protein shell and place within it RNA which essentially would be a virus?  

this imo would be the first step in creating more advanced life forms which will be possible as science advances.  I think it would be possible to create a human being from scratch when technology develops enough.  We figured out a while ago you don't actually need sperm to fertilize an egg, all you need is the actual genetic material, DNA to do it.
It's conceivable that if there is a creator, intelligent designer creating life would be a small feat compared to creating reality as we know it.

91 days later

disgusted
disgusted's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,959
2
3
3
disgusted's avatar
disgusted
2
3
3
--> @TheDredPriateRoberts
In your paradigm clay=genetic material. woo hoo.
Deb-8-a-bull
Deb-8-a-bull's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,119
3
2
3
Deb-8-a-bull's avatar
Deb-8-a-bull
3
2
3
Well yes . 
God could in fact make a man from clay. I will except this claim. 

However God had NO POSSIBLE way of knowing that clay needS to be fired. 
Not even God himself can skip the long drawn-out process of firing. 
firing a man size lump of clay,
back in the day.
Your looking at over 6 days.   

What i think that  has happened here is overtime the translation for this has got blurrd. 
 Andddd If i know the Christian flavored Gods like i think i do. 
It would of went something like this.
God made adam from HIS rib.
And adam then plssed in the dirt and made eve from the wee wee mud.



zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 15
Posts: 4,910
3
3
4
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
4
--> @BrotherDThomas
The Lord God breathed.
So where did the Lord God get his oxygen from prior to the creation thing.

ludofl3x
ludofl3x's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,378
3
2
2
ludofl3x's avatar
ludofl3x
3
2
2
What's with the dragging up of topics that are months old? 
ethang5
ethang5's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 5,474
3
3
6
ethang5's avatar
ethang5
3
3
6
--> @disgusted
Dee dee answered you bully. And you promptly ran away. Why?

Worse, you keep repeating the same incorrect question to other threads.

Do you have a reply for him? A comment on your error concerning the verse? Anything?


disgusted
disgusted's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,959
2
3
3
disgusted's avatar
disgusted
2
3
3
--> @ethang5
Who?
At least try to be coherent.
ethang5
ethang5's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 5,474
3
3
6
ethang5's avatar
ethang5
3
3
6
Post #2 in this thread genius.
disgusted
disgusted's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,959
2
3
3
disgusted's avatar
disgusted
2
3
3
--> @ethang5
I don't recognise that and didn't read it, unfortunately for you you did. But that's your level.
ethang5
ethang5's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 5,474
3
3
6
ethang5's avatar
ethang5
3
3
6
--> @disgusted
Lol!! It's YOUR thread Jethro! You didn't read the 2nd post to your own thread? The first post by a member to your own thread?

Yes bully. Reading is my level.

disgusted
disgusted's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,959
2
3
3
disgusted's avatar
disgusted
2
3
3
--> @ethang5
I see comprehension of the written English language still isn't though.
ethang5
ethang5's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 5,474
3
3
6
ethang5's avatar
ethang5
3
3
6
--> @disgusted
And post #2 still sits there showing your ignorance on the very topic you made a thread about.
Dynasty
Dynasty's avatar
Debates: 11
Posts: 207
0
1
7
Dynasty's avatar
Dynasty
0
1
7
--> @disgusted
It's believe, not beluieves. Also, the look into the Hebrew word "bara" ever more. Because, it doesn't always mean created.

disgusted
disgusted's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,959
2
3
3
disgusted's avatar
disgusted
2
3
3
--> @ethang5
You regularly have nothing to say and prattle meaninglessly anyway.
disgusted
disgusted's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,959
2
3
3
disgusted's avatar
disgusted
2
3
3
--> @Dynasty
Ooh please, please don't attack my typos, I'll be devastated you you you. lol
ethang5
ethang5's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 5,474
3
3
6
ethang5's avatar
ethang5
3
3
6
--> @disgusted
I checked. Post #2 is still there. Unaddressed and Unanswered.
disgusted
disgusted's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,959
2
3
3
disgusted's avatar
disgusted
2
3
3
--> @ethang5
What? WOW. Keep reading your fellow godists, remember; they are on your side little thang.
ethang5
ethang5's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 5,474
3
3
6
ethang5's avatar
ethang5
3
3
6
--> @disgusted
I checked. Post #2 is still there. Unaddressed and Unanswered.What?W

What?
If you can count to two, you can find the second post to your thread.

it was not clay, but dust, and where Jesus did not blow upon clay, but into the nostrils of man after he was formed from dust.
Ouch! No wonder you're pretending to have not seen it.
disgusted
disgusted's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,959
2
3
3
disgusted's avatar
disgusted
2
3
3
--> @ethang5
I don't read any of your leader's (brother something) posts, you are the only one dishonest enough to pretend.
Oh BTW your great book of lies and other fairy tales never mentions some Jesus blowing into clay nostrils, whatever they are. LOL
ethang5
ethang5's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 5,474
3
3
6
ethang5's avatar
ethang5
3
3
6
--> @disgusted
I don't read any of your leader's (brother aasomething) posts, 
Lol. You obviously don't read the bible either.

You might want to be less ignorant on a subject you plan to post about the next time you create a thread.

whatever they are...
Lol. Yeah. Whatever.

disgusted
disgusted's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,959
2
3
3
disgusted's avatar
disgusted
2
3
3
--> @ethang5
Your the one who claims your great book of bullshit says that Jesus blew in a clay nose, not me.
You're a funny little fellow.
ethang5
ethang5's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 5,474
3
3
6
ethang5's avatar
ethang5
3
3
6
--> @disgusted
When you read it, you'll see why your reputation is the way it is.

Clay. Lol

disgusted
disgusted's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,959
2
3
3
disgusted's avatar
disgusted
2
3
3
--> @ethang5
"Jesus" lol. Have you got a bible passage that supports your claim?