I only hope I have enough money to move somewhere so that I am barely impacted by it until my death.
So how's your day?
This.point it's divine finger and go ha ha ha you stupid human twats
they sure seem to think so since they were on tv preaching their gloom and doomI ain't scared of no flood (I ain't scared of no ghost, ghostbusters!)
I guess you are stating might equals right. I don't disagree.the likes of Obama, Decaprio, democratic candidates, children giving speeches or organizing rallies, no they are not "intelligent in the field?" But when has being informed or intelligent about a subject hindered anyone?
You have the scientist alarmist and the scientist deniers, which one to believe?
There are two sides to every story, somewhere in the middle is the truth.
It seems like you didn't even read your own link because it is supports me.
though the definitions of the terms can be problematic imo, change does not always = negative outcome.
the answer I keep hearing (solution) is doing away with fossil fuel, cars, cows etc. Though how that would really change things is a guess at best. Besides being impractical it would cost trillions of dollars and the biggest offenders wouldn't "clean up their act" (pun intended) We should strive for the cleanest air and water practical and there is more we could so. Izak Walton leagues often do road side and waterway cleanups. Organized cleanups like adopt a road type things don't require government involvement, just community. Anyway the point is, if people really cared and believed you'd see more personal involvement, accountability and responsibility don't you think?
Anyway the point is, if people really cared and believed you'd see more personal involvement, accountability and responsibility don't you think?
temperatures in cities are warmer than the surrounding areas as I'm sure large parking lots etc this is and has been a measurable thing. Do those things have a global impact? I'm not sure.
I don't believe the earth will end in 10 years, but we can hope.
which is nothing new as it's been happening for decades and yet here we still are no worse for wear.
Given they have been wrong every single time
Imo there is little to no hope any drastic change could or would ever be made, they would wait until it's much too late,
that's just the nature of the animal.
just because they had a bad year doesn't mean anything, 1 of something is just that, not a trend or evidence.
any other "predictions"?
don't get me wrong I remember the hole in the ozone but there's not much we are going to do to fix whatever they think bad will happen, unless we severely limit the human population. As more land is developed and stripped that will most likely have some effect and I would even say a negative one.consider an all vegan human population, the amount of farm land, fertilizers, pesticides and trucks to haul it all over the place, that doesn't sound any better. Not to mention importing even more from other countries with no real standards or regulations. Supplemental watering would be impossible. So a weather pattern which has a negative impact on crops in a given area could be catastrophic.
what is the solution to the problem? if there isn't one wgaf?
Worse than any-other.
So your making the claim increase forest fires are not a link to climate change? Please give me what it is because of then.yes as I pointed out tying the U.K. fires to climate change is conjecture.
weather/seasons etc are not static, new extremes should be expected regardless of what anyone thinks the cause is. The melting of the ice age was pretty extreme, but not man made right?
All records are meant to be broken, doesn't mean a thing unless you can show a trend, even then correlation does not imply causation.
predictions of what will happen if climate change is real, those science people you keep referring to, what other predictions do they have?
who gives a f*** wgaf :)