a person said. speaking in tongues is not evidence of salvation
would this be blashemy? i think it is based on mark 16:17.
Speaking in tongues, as it is often idiomized, refers to the speaking of other languages.
You have a very uncharitable attitude towards the apostles and the church.
You accuse the apostles because you are unable to fsce your own hypocrisy.
They were all rich. Jesus had surrounded himself with RICH influential people with business' and high positions. You can deny this fact as much as you like but your scripture makes it quite clear.
I am getting a bit fed up with you calling me a liar and hypocrite. Its about time you told us all what it is I have lied about and where have I shown hypocrisy. With a nice dollop of evidence to prove your claim. You never know, you might even be correct about me and I will apologies to you profusely and wholeheartedly.So, when your ready.
As I pointed out, gibberish is not legit speaking in tongues.
How do you identify legit speaking in tongues from sham speaking in tongues, exactly?
Just know that those who show no mercy will be shown no mercy,
They were all rich. Jesus had surrounded himself with RICH influential people with business' and high positions. You can deny this fact as much as you like but your scripture makes it quite clear.I don't need to deny anything, you are the one condemning rich people.
Again I tell you, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for someone who is rich to enter the kingdom of God."Matthew 19:24