Nature of time is 3-fold i.e. three primary types or threekinds of time

1} Observed

2}

3}

In the latter part of #2 above, the 'here' is relative ofcourse, because the local tick and the tock are emitted from the same 'here'locations, yet we also know that the location is most likely to be on aspinning planet, with a spinning galaxy, so and so on the outer the boundaryfluctuating surface events { ultra-micro }, of our finite,

Pi^4 - 31 = isPi-Time and may be one many perspectives for a Universal Absolute Time.

Let us say we knew the sum-total of occupied space quantum events/phenomena ofUniverse, and could give that a size value, and that we could alsoequalize the outer surfaceevents/phenomena to define a sphere, i.e. two or more radii as a many diameters.

Let us then say we can equalize the sum-total set of eventsinto finite value assigned to a four circular 2D planes of area.

Now we have the value for those four planes, and we know,for perfect sphere, the area of those four planes, are equal to surface area ofthe sphere defined by the four planes. This was first discovered by Archimedes via the sphericalcubo-octahedron as defined by four planes.

This above is the closet and easiest way I know to equate orliken our finite, occupied space Universe to as a black hole, were know, viaJacob Bekenstien and confirmed by Hawking, and considered in depth by LeonardSusskind

From here I take

If include the outer area of our sphere, we double the abovevalue to arrived at 531.2 i.e. 8 *

These last two values are new for me as the few steps is afirst for me. However, since some seeebuc8 as a master of association, I take note of the the 31 in the latter valueabove of 531.6. This directs me back towhy we subtract 31{ XYZ } from Pi^4.

Pi^3{ 3D/XYZ } is 31.00 62 7

For those who doubt that the 5-fold 31 contains the 4-foldcubo-octahedron, please see this link, wherein we find 5 overlapping sets ofthe 4-fold cubo-octahedron within the 5-fold icosahedrons 31 set.

http://www.rwgrayprojects.com/Lynn/LynnS54.html

Pi^4 can be perceived as Absolute Time or, we can considerSpace{ XYZ/3D } and Time values seperate, within the Pi powering context. Icame to choose the later. More on that later below and it is why what followsnext is my reasoning for why not to take Pi^4 { 97.4 } as an Absolute Time value.

First we consider what I call renormalization. I consider this because, 3rd powering{ ^3 }is in regards to XYZ/3D volume of Space, not time. So my first attempt went asfollows to seperate out the and absolute time value.

Pi^4 / 4 = 24.35 22 7 27....... and using my associativepowers, I took note of the rational side being the value for the 24 chords or24 radii of the 4-fold cubo-octahedron. Interesting yes, and not irrelevant toAbsolute Time, just not the correct value for Absolute Time.

Previously above I posted Pi^3 - 31 = 31.00 62 7

97.4 - 31 =

There is more distant associations to the above scenarios,that may not carry over well with the above givens, however, the is one more Ifeel directly associated to the above conclusions, and that is that both the5-fold icosahedron and 4-fold cubo-octahedron, have 12 vertexes, and between 12vertexes we have 66 diametric lines-of-relationship.

N^2 - N and divided by 2 i.e. 12^2 - 12 and divided by 2equals 66 lines-of-relationship for icosahedron and cubo-octahedron.

1} Observed

__Time__is physical reality {__occupied space__} andmost if not all fermions and bosons have and associated sine-wave frequency/\/\/\/ pattern, that, we assign as the primary primary symbolic representationfor Observed__Time__,2}

*Metaphysical-1 { mind/intellect/concepts }, Time i.e. theabstract { mental } lag rates { mental space }, apprehended via brain { nervoussystem } between events/phenomena located at locally here { tick } and againhere { tock },*3}

*Absolute Time via Pi-Time, i.e. a cosmic {Universe/Universal } Absolute Time and is also a metaphysical-1,mind/intellect/concept, that may have some associations to our #1 above,Observed Time*In the latter part of #2 above, the 'here' is relative ofcourse, because the local tick and the tock are emitted from the same 'here'locations, yet we also know that the location is most likely to be on aspinning planet, with a spinning galaxy, so and so on the outer the boundaryfluctuating surface events { ultra-micro }, of our finite,

__occupied space__Universe { Observed__Time__} ---diameter currently 93 billion lightyears----.Pi^4 - 31 = isPi-Time and may be one many perspectives for a Universal Absolute Time.

Let us say we knew the sum-total of occupied space quantum events/phenomena ofUniverse, and could give that a size value, and that we could alsoequalize the outer surfaceevents/phenomena to define a sphere, i.e. two or more radii as a many diameters.

Let us then say we can equalize the sum-total set of eventsinto finite value assigned to a four circular 2D planes of area.

Now we have the value for those four planes, and we know,for perfect sphere, the area of those four planes, are equal to surface area ofthe sphere defined by the four planes. This was first discovered by Archimedes via the sphericalcubo-octahedron as defined by four planes.

This above is the closet and easiest way I know to equate orliken our finite, occupied space Universe to as a black hole, were know, viaJacob Bekenstien and confirmed by Hawking, and considered in depth by LeonardSusskind

From here I take

**66.4*** 4 = 265.6, and this is the firsttime, i've arrived at this 265.6 value associated with Pi-Time or with four 2Dplanes of area and whatever value for number quantum events/phenomena.If include the outer area of our sphere, we double the abovevalue to arrived at 531.2 i.e. 8 *

**66.4**.These last two values are new for me as the few steps is afirst for me. However, since some seeebuc8 as a master of association, I take note of the the 31 in the latter valueabove of 531.6. This directs me back towhy we subtract 31{ XYZ } from Pi^4.

Pi^3{ 3D/XYZ } is 31.00 62 7

**66**....... and I associate therational whole side value with the finite set of 31 Primary Great Planes of the5-fold icosa{20}hedron. Since 3rdpowering is cartesian, XYZ/3D volmetric space, and the 5-fold icosahedroncontains, the 4-fold cubo-octahedron ---ergo thee 3-fold, 2-fold and 2-fold---,we presume this 5-fold 31, is the top of Pi-circle-planeheirarchy/outline.For those who doubt that the 5-fold 31 contains the 4-foldcubo-octahedron, please see this link, wherein we find 5 overlapping sets ofthe 4-fold cubo-octahedron within the 5-fold icosahedrons 31 set.

http://www.rwgrayprojects.com/Lynn/LynnS54.html

Pi^4 can be perceived as Absolute Time or, we can considerSpace{ XYZ/3D } and Time values seperate, within the Pi powering context. Icame to choose the later. More on that later below and it is why what followsnext is my reasoning for why not to take Pi^4 { 97.4 } as an Absolute Time value.

First we consider what I call renormalization. I consider this because, 3rd powering{ ^3 }is in regards to XYZ/3D volume of Space, not time. So my first attempt went asfollows to seperate out the and absolute time value.

Pi^4 / 4 = 24.35 22 7 27....... and using my associativepowers, I took note of the rational side being the value for the 24 chords or24 radii of the 4-fold cubo-octahedron. Interesting yes, and not irrelevant toAbsolute Time, just not the correct value for Absolute Time.

Previously above I posted Pi^3 - 31 = 31.00 62 7

**66**....isXYZ Primary set and value i.e. a Primary or absolute volumetric space valuewith 2D plane area definition. Nowsubtract that value from P^4 i.e. if we take away the Space Pi-Value, we areleft with the Absolute Pi-Time Absolute Value.97.4 - 31 =

**66.4**ergo Absolute PI-Time.Pi^3 = 31.00 62 7

**66**....There is more distant associations to the above scenarios,that may not carry over well with the above givens, however, the is one more Ifeel directly associated to the above conclusions, and that is that both the5-fold icosahedron and 4-fold cubo-octahedron, have 12 vertexes, and between 12vertexes we have 66 diametric lines-of-relationship.

N^2 - N and divided by 2 i.e. 12^2 - 12 and divided by 2equals 66 lines-of-relationship for icosahedron and cubo-octahedron.