Woman More Complex Than Man

Author: mustardness ,

Topic's posts

Posts in total: 47
  • mustardness
    mustardness avatar
    Debates: 0
    Forum posts: 2,029
    2
    1
    3
    mustardness avatar
    mustardness
    Woman is more complex than man ergo woman is most complex entity of Universe, barring scenarios that involve more than one woman or woman plus man etc.

    Ex a galaxy with a human in it, is o of course more complex than a galaxy with no man or woman or Earth-like planet.

    This is a minimal brainer yet we find so many who attempt to argue against the obvious. Why? Ego is their problem.
  • RationalMadman
    RationalMadman avatar
    Debates: 286
    Forum posts: 8,824
    10
    10
    11
    RationalMadman avatar
    RationalMadman
    God is a woman but not due to this.
  • RationalMadman
    RationalMadman avatar
    Debates: 286
    Forum posts: 8,824
    10
    10
    11
    RationalMadman avatar
    RationalMadman
    Women are far simpler than men in general, the cliche has it very backwards and I can prove it.
  • mustardness
    mustardness avatar
    Debates: 0
    Forum posts: 2,029
    2
    1
    3
    mustardness avatar
    mustardness
    --> @RationalMadman
    RaMad, your appear to b similar level of rationality and intellectual integrity as Mopac.

    Or at least your thought patterns remind of them.

    I.e. you have nothing of significance to state that adds to or invalidates my givens as stated.

    Very common here at DArt. Waste of head space as well other kinds of space.
  • RationalMadman
    RationalMadman avatar
    Debates: 286
    Forum posts: 8,824
    10
    10
    11
    RationalMadman avatar
    RationalMadman
    --> @mustardness
    kk gonna report your reply and not insult you back. You fucking with a real G here, watch your mouth boy.

    You spew some shit because you cant understand women like waaa waaa waaa waa stop bitching about it.

    Women are not more complex than men, they are actually psychologically simpler, men have three layers where women have two.

    This is a theory I have formed and not official psychology. Men have a layer of personality that is solely dedicated to hiding their sensitive side but women share the two sides of 'caring' and 'hostile' but lack the 'shield'. This is not the same as lying or a mask, this is an involuntary aspect to psychology only present in males as they go through puberty (and from then onward) and I have noticed consistently that women lack this 'shield' element to their persona and enjoy feeling the highs and lows that come with lacking it.
  • mustardness
    mustardness avatar
    Debates: 0
    Forum posts: 2,029
    2
    1
    3
    mustardness avatar
    mustardness
    --> @RationalMadman
    RaMad, your like Mopac except he does not cuss and rant like you.

    You have nothing of rational, logical common sense that is significant to add to, or invalidate my givens as stated.

    Please take a hike until you can meet the criteria Ive laid out in many threads and here above. Please oh Please take a hike.
  • RationalMadman
    RationalMadman avatar
    Debates: 286
    Forum posts: 8,824
    10
    10
    11
    RationalMadman avatar
    RationalMadman
    --> @mustardness
    Or what?
  • mustardness
    mustardness avatar
    Debates: 0
    Forum posts: 2,029
    2
    1
    3
    mustardness avatar
    mustardness
    --> @RationalMadman

    OMG, please take a hike until you can meet the criteria Ive laid out in many threads and here above.

    Please oh Please take a hike. Thanks Again for your assistance in these regards



  • Castin
    Castin avatar
    Debates: 0
    Forum posts: 1,944
    2
    2
    6
    Castin avatar
    Castin
    --> @mustardness
    Woman is more complex than man ergo woman is most complex entity of Universe, barring scenarios that involve more than one woman or woman plus man etc.

    Ex a galaxy with a human in it, is o of course more complex than a galaxy with no man or woman or Earth-like planet.

    This is a minimal brainer yet we find so many who attempt to argue against the obvious. Why? Ego is their problem.
    What is your basis for this conclusion?
  • mustardness
    mustardness avatar
    Debates: 0
    Forum posts: 2,029
    2
    1
    3
    mustardness avatar
    mustardness
    --> @Castin
    What is your basis for this conclusion?
    Are you serious? Do really believe woman is not more complex than man?

    Yes or no, and then I will give the rationale for the conclusion Ive reached, since you dont have any rationale for my  conclusion.

    It should be fairly obvious to most.

  • RationalMadman
    RationalMadman avatar
    Debates: 286
    Forum posts: 8,824
    10
    10
    11
    RationalMadman avatar
    RationalMadman
    Are you serious? Do really believe woman is not more complex than man?
    Yes.

    Yes or no, and then I will give the rationale for the conclusion Ive reached, since you dont have any rationale for my  conclusion.

    It should be fairly obvious to most. 

  • Greyparrot
    Greyparrot avatar
    Debates: 2
    Forum posts: 8,166
    3
    3
    8
    Greyparrot avatar
    Greyparrot
    --> @RationalMadman
    This claim is easily debunked on the gender bell-curve where far more males reside on the outlier tails than women. Easily verifiable with male/female incarceration ratios, testing, and a general list of male/female overachievers.
  • RationalMadman
    RationalMadman avatar
    Debates: 286
    Forum posts: 8,824
    10
    10
    11
    RationalMadman avatar
    RationalMadman
    --> @Greyparrot
    How do you think that disproves me?
  • Greyparrot
    Greyparrot avatar
    Debates: 2
    Forum posts: 8,166
    3
    3
    8
    Greyparrot avatar
    Greyparrot
    --> @RationalMadman
    The OP's claims I meant, sorry.
  • mustardness
    mustardness avatar
    Debates: 0
    Forum posts: 2,029
    2
    1
    3
    mustardness avatar
    mustardness
    --> @Castin
    What is your basis for this conclusion?
    Castin do you understand there are, at minimum, two definitions of complex?

    1} mathematical, ex 3 is more complex 1.   One has not relationships, 3 and three relationships. 4 had 6 relationships etc with exponential growth rated.
    ...see this link
    2} synergetic complexity i.e. something occurs that is not predicted by sum of its parts.


    First I will give you a simple mathematical example of woman being more complex than man Xx vs Xy i.e. Xx has many more parts ergo many more lines-of-relationship.

    These more parts and more lines-of-relationship interact in ways to make woman more complex than man. You still have no idea of ways women or more complex than men?


  • mustardness
    mustardness avatar
    Debates: 0
    Forum posts: 2,029
    2
    1
    3
    mustardness avatar
    mustardness
    1} mathematical, ex 3 is more complex 1. 

    1  has no/zip/nada lines of relationship

    2 has one line-of-relationship  ___

    3 has three-lines-of-relationship  /\  ergo the minimal 2D enclosed area

    4 takes a quantum{?} leap to 6 lines-of-relationship  /\  /\  ergo a 3D minimal an volumetric tetrahedron 

    ...see this link

    2} synergetic complexity i.e. something occurs that is not predicted by sum of its parts.

    We see this with the above mentioned 6 lines-of-relationship /\  /\  and here is link to explain how these two triangles synergeticallly sum to four of the same size triangles as the orginal two. So 1 + 1 = 4 and 3 angles + 3 angles = 12 surface angles of the tetrahedron.



    First I will give you a simple mathematical example of woman being more complex than man Xx vs Xy i.e. Xx has many more parts ergo many more lines-of-relationship.  Xx is greated numerically than Xy. Do you understand that, Castin?

    These more parts, and more lines-of-relationship, interact in ways to make woman more complex than man.

    You still have no idea of ways women or more complex than men?

    Here is one resultant of the above. Women have womb/uterus and that alone makes them more complex than man. The list goes on.

  • RationalMadman
    RationalMadman avatar
    Debates: 286
    Forum posts: 8,824
    10
    10
    11
    RationalMadman avatar
    RationalMadman
    --> @mustardness
    Y is not just 3 X parts without the fourth, it's a totally different formation, you utterly delusional sexist.

    It looks like 3<4 is simple but you dont understand what more XY allows than the XX combination as you are ignoring interaction.
  • RationalMadman
    RationalMadman avatar
    Debates: 286
    Forum posts: 8,824
    10
    10
    11
    RationalMadman avatar
    RationalMadman
    --> @mustardness
    We are originally female-looking embyros and change into male if we end up male later on in development, men are the next adapted thing, men are the more complex thing. Women find men sexy when the men are intelligent and take charge and display superiority to other beings (including the female herself). Women are not only less complex, they enjoy being it.
  • mustardness
    mustardness avatar
    Debates: 0
    Forum posts: 2,029
    2
    1
    3
    mustardness avatar
    mustardness

    Women have womb/uterus and that alone makes them more complex than man. The list goes on. This pretty simple minimal brainer conclusions.

    1} mathematical, ex 3 is more complex 1. 

    1  has no/zip/nada lines-of-relationship

    2 has one line-of-relationship  ___

    3 has three-lines-of-relationship  /\  ergo the minimal 2D enclosed area

    4 takes a quantum{?} leap to 6 lines-of-relationship  /\  /\  ergo a 3D minimal an volumetric tetrahedron 

    ...see this link

    2} synergetic complexity i.e. something occurs that is not predicted by sum of its parts.

    We see this with the above mentioned 6 lines-of-relationship /\  /\  and here is link to explain how these two triangles synergeticallly sum to four of the same size triangles as the orginal two. So 1 + 1 = 4 and 3 angles + 3 angles = 12 surface angles of the tetrahedron.


    First I will give you a simple mathematical example of woman being more complex than man Xx vs Xy i.e. Xx has many more parts ergo many more lines-of-relationship.  Xx is greated numerically than Xy. Do you understand that, Castin?

    These more parts, and more lines-of-relationship, interact in ways to make woman more complex than man.

    You still have no idea of ways women or more complex than men?




  • RationalMadman
    RationalMadman avatar
    Debates: 286
    Forum posts: 8,824
    10
    10
    11
    RationalMadman avatar
    RationalMadman
    --> @mustardness
    It is the ultimate function of the female to produce males, think about it and you will realise it's been true for millennia in human civilisation.

    Women are the support, men are the supported, it's not cruel it's just true.

    On the other hand to support a high ranking male requires no mercy on the men lower down so this isn't about women being inferior to males as a whole at all.
  • mustardness
    mustardness avatar
    Debates: 0
    Forum posts: 2,029
    2
    1
    3
    mustardness avatar
    mustardness
    Irrational, illogical and lack of common sense posters need not apply. Waste of head space.

    Fact/truth  #1-- Xx has is numerically more complex than Xy.

    Fact/truth #2 Women have womb/uterus and men have no comparable body organ, other than a prostate gland.

    Does any rational, logical common sense people believe the prostate gland is more complex than womb/uterus? Of course not

    1} mathematical, ex 3 is more complex 1. 

    One  has no/zip/nada lines-of-relationship

    Two has one line-of-relationship  ___

    Three has three-lines-of-relationship  /\  ergo the minimal 2D enclosed area

    At four there is a quantum{?} leap over four and five lines-of-relationship,  to 6 lines-of-relationship  /\  /\  ergo a 3D minimal an volumetric tetrahedron 

    ...see this link

    2} synergetic complexity i.e. something occurs that is not predicted by sum of its parts.

    We see this with the above mentioned 6 lines-of-relationship /\  /\  and here is link to explain how these two triangles synergeticaly sum to four of the same size triangles as the orginal two. So 1 + 1 = 4 and 3 angles + 3 angles = 12 surface angles of the tetrahedron.



    Yes, numerically elephants have more cells ergo more lines-of-relationships yet they are not as synergetically complex as humans.

    Woman is most complex entity of Universe, barring any scenarios that involve two or more women and or woman and man, or woman and Earth

  • RationalMadman
    RationalMadman avatar
    Debates: 286
    Forum posts: 8,824
    10
    10
    11
    RationalMadman avatar
    RationalMadman
    --> @mustardness
    Men's complexity lies in their heads not in their cocks.
  • mustardness
    mustardness avatar
    Debates: 0
    Forum posts: 2,029
    2
    1
    3
    mustardness avatar
    mustardness
    So why do we have irrational, illogical lack of common sense people on Earth?  Why do they repeat their errors?

    Ego is the greatest danger to humanity. Denial of truth is a sign of ego running the show. Sad :--(

    Irrational, illogical and lack of common sense posters need not apply. Waste of head space.

    Fact/truth  #1-- Xx has is numerically more complex than Xy.

    Fact/truth #2 Women have womb/uterus and men have no comparable body organ, other than a prostate gland.

    Does any rational, logical common sense people believe the prostate gland is more complex than womb/uterus? Of course not

    1} mathematical, ex 3 is more complex 1. 

    One  has no/zip/nada lines-of-relationship

    Two has one line-of-relationship  ___

    Three has three-lines-of-relationship  /\  ergo the minimal 2D enclosed area

    At four there is a quantum{?} leap over four and five lines-of-relationship,  to 6 lines-of-relationship  /\  /\  ergo a 3D minimal an volumetric tetrahedron 

    ...see this link

    2} synergetic complexity i.e. something occurs that is not predicted by sum of its parts.

    We see this with the above mentioned 6 lines-of-relationship /\  /\  and here is link to explain how these two triangles synergeticaly sum to four of the same size triangles as the orginal two. So 1 + 1 = 4 and 3 angles + 3 angles = 12 surface angles of the tetrahedron.



    Yes, numerically elephants have more cells ergo more lines-of-relationships yet they are not as synergetically complex as humans.

    Woman is most complex entity of Universe, barring any scenarios that involve two or more women and or woman and man, or woman and Earth


  • disgusted
    disgusted avatar
    Debates: 0
    Forum posts: 4,959
    2
    3
    3
    disgusted avatar
    disgusted
    --> @RationalMadman
    How old are you and which book of fables did you read that in?
  • mustardness
    mustardness avatar
    Debates: 0
    Forum posts: 2,029
    2
    1
    3
    mustardness avatar
    mustardness
    Im old enough to do know better but not smart enough to do better.

    Aesop fables from Rocky{ the squirrel } and Bullwinkle { the moose } cartoon  show.

    Woman Xx ---two ovaries --bilateral

    Man Xy  ----two testes---bilateral

    Tetra(4)hedron 4 faces/openings

    Cubo{6}-octa{8}hedron defined by four great hexagonal planes

    DNA four bases

    RNA four bases

    Animals fore arms rear legs primary set of four motion appendages

    Human animal arms and legs ergo primary set of four motion appendages

    EMRadiation has four primary peaks and troughts via electric /\/ sine-wave and magnetic \/\ sine-wave

    Four chambers of heart