Is there going to be a list of people banned

Author: disgusted ,

Topic's posts

Posts in total: 22
  • disgusted
    disgusted avatar
    Debates: 0
    Forum posts: 4,959
    2
    3
    3
    disgusted avatar
    disgusted
    and the length of the sentence and the reason for banning? I'm looking forward to seeing some names. hahahahaha

  • RationalMadman
    RationalMadman avatar
    Debates: 301
    Forum posts: 8,991
    10
    10
    11
    RationalMadman avatar
    RationalMadman
    --> @disgusted
    If the Vagabond account is banned at the moment why are you allowed to use this one?
  • disgusted
    disgusted avatar
    Debates: 0
    Forum posts: 4,959
    2
    3
    3
    disgusted avatar
    disgusted
    --> @RationalMadman
    Any evidence? Oh dear NO!. carry on.
  • RationalMadman
    RationalMadman avatar
    Debates: 301
    Forum posts: 8,991
    10
    10
    11
    RationalMadman avatar
    RationalMadman
    --> @disgusted
    The strike through the name at present?


  • bsh1
    bsh1 avatar
    Debates: 14
    Forum posts: 2,589
    5
    5
    8
    bsh1 avatar
    bsh1
    --> @RationalMadman
    I am still considering this; we'll see how things shake out. At this point, I am disinclined to post such a list, but I have not explicitly ruled out creating one in the future.

  • disgusted
    disgusted avatar
    Debates: 0
    Forum posts: 4,959
    2
    3
    3
    disgusted avatar
    disgusted
    --> @RationalMadman
    I asked for evidence, I'm not sure what you make of that but your response indicates a vacuous understanding at best.
  • disgusted
    disgusted avatar
    Debates: 0
    Forum posts: 4,959
    2
    3
    3
    disgusted avatar
    disgusted
    --> @bsh1
    Do you have any plan to inform a member of banning and the duration of that ban?
  • bsh1
    bsh1 avatar
    Debates: 14
    Forum posts: 2,589
    5
    5
    8
    bsh1 avatar
    bsh1
    --> @disgusted
    Do you have any plan to inform a member of banning and the duration of that ban?
    Absolutely. The COC that was implemented at the time of me becoming a mod reads, in part:

    > "The temp-banned user will be notified of their ban no less than one hour prior to their ban taking effect unless moderation has cause to believe that a delay in implementing the ban would result in harm to the site, a site user, or further violations of this code of conduct. The user will be presented with evidence of their offense (in a manner consistent with the rights of other members) and the date of their ban’s expiration. The user has the right to offer a defense against the charges."

    and

    > "The perma-banned user will be notified of their ban no less than three hours prior to their ban taking effect unless moderation has cause to believe that a delay in implementing the ban would result in harm to the site, a site user, or further violations of this code of conduct. The user will be presented with evidence of their offense (in a manner consistent with the rights of other members). The user has the right to offer a defense against the charges."

    The emphasis in these passages is my own. Moderation will give the users the opportunity to offer a defense to the presented evidence before the decision to implement a ban is ultimately decided upon.

  • RationalMadman
    RationalMadman avatar
    Debates: 301
    Forum posts: 8,991
    10
    10
    11
    RationalMadman avatar
    RationalMadman
    --> @disgusted
    Your understanding of my understanding is what's lacking here.
  • disgusted
    disgusted avatar
    Debates: 0
    Forum posts: 4,959
    2
    3
    3
    disgusted avatar
    disgusted
    --> @bsh1
    Lovely! It is just that I wasn't granted any of these niceties and so a thread giving this information to all members will alleviate certain members lying about decisions made by mods that they have no knowledge of. These spurious aspersions promulgated by individuals are probably the most egregious that a member might face and should be dealt with in the most serious fashion a mod has available.
    There are several members who fall into this category and should be subject to very harsh punishment by the mods.
    I hope that helps. I'm more than happy to cite the behaviour of these members if you need confirmation.
  • RationalMadman
    RationalMadman avatar
    Debates: 301
    Forum posts: 8,991
    10
    10
    11
    RationalMadman avatar
    RationalMadman
    --> @disgusted
    Actually you're wrong and I say this as the single best banned member of DDO history. Banned members want to be infamous, glorified and remembered. You're only doing the banned member a favour by making a public list.
  • disgusted
    disgusted avatar
    Debates: 0
    Forum posts: 4,959
    2
    3
    3
    disgusted avatar
    disgusted
    --> @RationalMadman
    Were you responding to something I wrote? Never mind, it's not important much like you dear chap.
  • bsh1
    bsh1 avatar
    Debates: 14
    Forum posts: 2,589
    5
    5
    8
    bsh1 avatar
    bsh1
    --> @disgusted
    Lovely! It is just that I wasn't granted any of these niceties
    Your ban occurred before my modship and before the implementation of the COC, so those policies weren't in place at that time.
  • RationalMadman
    RationalMadman avatar
    Debates: 301
    Forum posts: 8,991
    10
    10
    11
    RationalMadman avatar
    RationalMadman
    --> @disgusted
    How are you important? I am extremely important both to the community and the debates themselves in percentage of debates completed that I've done vs other users on this site so far.
  • disgusted
    disgusted avatar
    Debates: 0
    Forum posts: 4,959
    2
    3
    3
    disgusted avatar
    disgusted
    --> @bsh1
    So as we've agreed there is no possible reason for my banning, since there were no rules to break. It was just because the hatefilled thang cried to "mike". Yeah I know how it worked, why do you still accept his advice? Have you warned him concerning his incessant personal attacks?
  • disgusted
    disgusted avatar
    Debates: 0
    Forum posts: 4,959
    2
    3
    3
    disgusted avatar
    disgusted
    --> @RationalMadman
    Whatever...............................sheesh...............................
  • bsh1
    bsh1 avatar
    Debates: 14
    Forum posts: 2,589
    5
    5
    8
    bsh1 avatar
    bsh1
    --> @disgusted
    So as we've agreed there is no possible reason for my banning
    That, in no way, reflects anything I have said to you.

    I am not going to comment publicly on specific cases or potential moderation action against other users.

  • disgusted
    disgusted avatar
    Debates: 0
    Forum posts: 4,959
    2
    3
    3
    disgusted avatar
    disgusted
    --> @bsh1
    Fair enough. Each to his own.
  • ethang5
    ethang5 avatar
    Debates: 1
    Forum posts: 4,621
    3
    3
    6
    ethang5 avatar
    ethang5
    Lol. This thread is funnier than I expected it to be.

    Though I don't see how the strike through current system is lacking.


  • disgusted
    disgusted avatar
    Debates: 0
    Forum posts: 4,959
    2
    3
    3
    disgusted avatar
    disgusted
    --> @ethang5
    You wouldn't. hahahaha
  • ethang5
    ethang5 avatar
    Debates: 1
    Forum posts: 4,621
    3
    3
    6
    ethang5 avatar
    ethang5
    --> @disgusted
    Told you the thread was funny.

    But then again, you cackle like that all the time for apparently no reason.


  • bsh1
    bsh1 avatar
    Debates: 14
    Forum posts: 2,589
    5
    5
    8
    bsh1 avatar
    bsh1
    --> @disgusted
    Please feel free to comment more extensively here: