i wanted him to be nominated. if i have to choose between roe or no roe, i say no roe. but they are mishandling the claims. consider
1 she passed a lie detector.
2 they can give him a lie detector. in both scenarios no matter the outcome no one will really know if they are accurate. but if the tests are consistent on whether he did it or not, that's pretty big.
3. she wants an investigation. all it takes is three days to conduct one, as occurred with anita hill.
these are points i didn't know until i decided to look into them more. head line news is poor at giving the low down. as is usually the case, when i'm taking the republican stance, it's because i lack education on the matter.