Earth and Moon Geometry

Author: janesix ,

Posts

Total: 58
janesix
janesix's avatar
Debates: 11
Posts: 2,033
3
3
3
janesix's avatar
janesix
3
3
3

Goldtop
Goldtop's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,713
2
1
2
Goldtop's avatar
Goldtop
2
1
2
And, we are supposed to learn what exactly?
janesix
janesix's avatar
Debates: 11
Posts: 2,033
3
3
3
janesix's avatar
janesix
3
3
3
--> @Goldtop
About our created solar system. 

Did you watch the video?
Goldtop
Goldtop's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,713
2
1
2
Goldtop's avatar
Goldtop
2
1
2
--> @janesix
You mean, did I watch the video that you've put up before and have been obsessed about for some time? Yes. That's why I'm asking what is it we're supposed to learn? I see nothing of value there.
janesix
janesix's avatar
Debates: 11
Posts: 2,033
3
3
3
janesix's avatar
janesix
3
3
3
--> @Goldtop
you are blind.
Goldtop
Goldtop's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,713
2
1
2
Goldtop's avatar
Goldtop
2
1
2
--> @janesix
Thank you for confirming there is nothing of value there.
janesix
janesix's avatar
Debates: 11
Posts: 2,033
3
3
3
janesix's avatar
janesix
3
3
3
--> @Goldtop
Of course there is value. It shows how the Earth and Moon conform to squared circle geometry,and it is evidence of a created solar system.
Goldtop
Goldtop's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,713
2
1
2
Goldtop's avatar
Goldtop
2
1
2
--> @janesix
Still can't be honest with yourself. How sad is that.
janesix
janesix's avatar
Debates: 11
Posts: 2,033
3
3
3
janesix's avatar
janesix
3
3
3
--> @Goldtop
I see you can't prove it wrong, so you resort to troll tactics. 
Goldtop
Goldtop's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,713
2
1
2
Goldtop's avatar
Goldtop
2
1
2
--> @janesix
Prove what wrong? I said there's nothing of value, nothing to learn. You said I'm blind which makes you dishonest because you have not said anything of value. This is your obsession, not mine. If all you can do is put a video and say nothing, then what is your point? This makes you look like a troll.
janesix
janesix's avatar
Debates: 11
Posts: 2,033
3
3
3
janesix's avatar
janesix
3
3
3
--> @Goldtop
You are not interested in truth. Go away troll. 


Outplayz
Outplayz's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 2,164
2
3
4
Outplayz's avatar
Outplayz
2
3
4
--> @janesix
I have some criticisms. 1) it very likely could have accidentally happened... actually, the Stonehenge part is proof of accidents bc i doubt the ancients had this relationship on their minds when they made Stonehenge so that also could be an accident. Or, maybe they were just smart and understood the implications of building it that way... either way, it's all possible to have a natural explanation. 

2) This sorta falls under the fine tune argument. It's curious that things are fine-tuned for life, but if they weren't we wouldn't be here. That is why i think it is a weak argument. Sure things are fine-tuned for life... but if they weren't we wouldn't exist. Therefore, out of millions of tries and one being right sounds like mere chance to me... or at least, could also be a coincidence as much as the latter.

janesix
janesix's avatar
Debates: 11
Posts: 2,033
3
3
3
janesix's avatar
janesix
3
3
3
--> @Outplayz
what type of natural explanation? How could this relationship occur naturally?
Outplayz
Outplayz's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 2,164
2
3
4
Outplayz's avatar
Outplayz
2
3
4
--> @janesix
Accidentally could happen naturally. 
Goldtop
Goldtop's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,713
2
1
2
Goldtop's avatar
Goldtop
2
1
2
--> @janesix
You are not interested in truth. Go away troll. 

All you've done is confirmed your dishonesty and the only way you can respond is to insult.

You've said nothing for the value of that video which means you know it has no value. Pure dishonesty.

How very sad and disappointing, Jane.
Goldtop
Goldtop's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,713
2
1
2
Goldtop's avatar
Goldtop
2
1
2
--> @janesix
You are not interested in truth.
You are not interested in honesty or truth.

janesix
janesix's avatar
Debates: 11
Posts: 2,033
3
3
3
janesix's avatar
janesix
3
3
3
--> @Goldtop
It's value is in it's evidence of design. What are you not getting about that fact?
janesix
janesix's avatar
Debates: 11
Posts: 2,033
3
3
3
janesix's avatar
janesix
3
3
3
--> @Outplayz
Do you find that very likely?
Outplayz
Outplayz's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 2,164
2
3
4
Outplayz's avatar
Outplayz
2
3
4
--> @janesix
I think it is the same for both, 50/50. Fine-tune makes sense in design. Especially since the closer you get to us, the subjects of the painting, it gets more fine tuned. That is the same with art... the closer you get to the subjects, it's more detailed. So... it's definitely curious. But given how big our universe is and the possibility of multi-verses... accidentally could be just as likely. 
Goldtop
Goldtop's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,713
2
1
2
Goldtop's avatar
Goldtop
2
1
2
--> @janesix
Sorry, I see no design whatsoever. That's a faith based assertion that does not follow from that video at all. More dishonesty on your part.
janesix
janesix's avatar
Debates: 11
Posts: 2,033
3
3
3
janesix's avatar
janesix
3
3
3
what is your gut feeling? Is it designed?
Outplayz
Outplayz's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 2,164
2
3
4
Outplayz's avatar
Outplayz
2
3
4
--> @janesix
what is your gut feeling? Is it designed?
I believe in intelligent design... not creationism. 

janesix
janesix's avatar
Debates: 11
Posts: 2,033
3
3
3
janesix's avatar
janesix
3
3
3
--> @Goldtop
I am not surprised you don't see design. That would disrupt your worldview. You need to hold on to that at all cost.

janesix
janesix's avatar
Debates: 11
Posts: 2,033
3
3
3
janesix's avatar
janesix
3
3
3
--> @Outplayz
I am not 100% convinced it was God who designed the solar system.
EtrnlVw
EtrnlVw's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 2,808
3
3
5
EtrnlVw's avatar
EtrnlVw
3
3
5
--> @Outplayz
I believe in intelligent design... not creationism. 

What would be the difference if I may ask?