Soduku Pi Pattern and 22 /7 =

Author: ebuc ,

Topic's posts

Posts in total: 7
  • ebuc
    ebuc avatar
    Debates: 0
    Forum posts: 1,472
    3
    2
    4
    ebuc avatar
    ebuc
    First let me make clear, I know nothing about Soduku.  All I really was reminded of in this video LINK https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TkVwHx2I3F4

     is that 22 / 7 = 3.1428571428571428571428571428571 an that is an approximate of Pi { 3.1415926535897932384626433832795 }

    3.14 15 92 65 35897932384626433832795  = Pi and we see the first change is at 4th overall digit that is the 3rd on irrational side

    3.14 28 57 14 28571428571428571428571 = Pi approximation

    What caught  my eye was the 22.  since It is  one of my Pi-related resultants is 24.22 35 7 26 4 via my re-normalization process and i use that value specifically as create the four subsets of 66.4.

    66.4 minus 24.22 35 7 26 4 = 42.17 64 27 36 { ergo 42 }

    42.17 64 27 36 minus 24.22 35 7 26 4 = 17.95 28 54 72  ergo 18

    42.17 64 27 36 { 42.1 } minus 17. 95 28 54 72  = 24.22 35 7 26 4 ergo 24.2

    24.22 35 7 26 4{ 24.2 } minus 18 = 6.29 50 25 44 { 6.3  or even 6.4 }. 

    6.29 50 25 44 { 6.3 or even 6.4 } ergo  my  low end of time dilation/Lorentz contraction space

    So not sure if there is more to go into with this Soduk discovery, however, I would take this time to question whether Fuller as to quick to disregard Pi?   I say this because Pi can be truncated and often ---if not always--  so it can be worked with in a sane, rational, logical common sense methology.

    Ex Fuller and others consider truncated tetrahedron or other polyhedra.  Multiplication-by-division of polyhedra is a form of serious truncations and truncates polyhedron into two seperate wholes, that, may have fractional values and of course we know Fuller uses fractional values in Synergetics if not transcendental > infinity values that are then truncated.

  • RationalMadman
    RationalMadman avatar
    Debates: 332
    Forum posts: 10,133
    10
    10
    11
    RationalMadman avatar
    RationalMadman
  • ebuc
    ebuc avatar
    Debates: 0
    Forum posts: 1,472
    3
    2
    4
    ebuc avatar
    ebuc
    --> @RationalMadman
    If we think of symmetry as being  associated to pure { Fullers Prime }, and asymmetry as off-center { Fullers tainted }, then an irrational number would appear to me to be less than pure ergo tainted/off-center., however, a transcendentall infinite fraction is beyond/Meta }  being just an off-center { tainted } irrational number.


    There exists no true vacuum or true equlibrium in our eternally existent, finite, occupied space Universe i.e. Universe abhors a true vacuum and true equilibrium. Ultra-micro, Metaphysical-3 Gravity ( G) and ultra--micro, Metaphysical-4, Dark Energy D)(E ---bisection of torus ( <G-DE>)(<DE-G> )---, are ultra- thin surface events --think of event horizon of black hole--, and are the ultra-high tension.

    For this reason, Ive come to believe, virutal particles are the ultra-high tension G-DE, being  released as ultra-micro events from outer and inner surface events of my presented tori { Great Tori as Vectors } and I now am coming to believe that is what the inversion-outversions { (><) } are from my numerically presented, spiral, helixed tori,, exhibited as the texticonic iconic Space(>st< ) i (>st<)Space, wherein, physical reality { Observed time/quantised-quantified } is the on the inside toroidal tube as s{ relative space } * { biologic consciousness } and t{ relative time }, and i { Metaphysical-1 ego/identity }.

  • zedvictor4
    zedvictor4 avatar
    Debates: 15
    Forum posts: 4,170
    3
    3
    3
    zedvictor4 avatar
    zedvictor4
    Sudoku

    Sodoku

    Soduku

    The triple prime coefficient, that extends the radii of the arc of a great circle and a fantastic polyhedra.......Irrational, insane and insensible.

    Rats, doughnuts, black holes and number puzzles..selzzup rebmun dna seloh kcalb ,stunhguod ,staR

    Imperfect symmetry....Becky?


  • ebuc
    ebuc avatar
    Debates: 0
    Forum posts: 1,472
    3
    2
    4
    ebuc avatar
    ebuc
    --> @zedvictor4
    Zed, you appear confused.

    Pi = pushing-Outward  So how can I say that a conceptually static, geometrically mathematical ratio, can be associated with pushing-Outward { expansion } motion?

    Because it keeps expanding until it is truncated? So it is similar to an infinite irrational number even if it is not catagorized that way?

    All, if not most, pushing-Outward phenomena of Universe, is a resultant of pulling-INward phenomena ex our brains sends only one signal to the muscles and that is to contract. When that signal stops the muscles expand Out-ward.

    Maybe I'm missing something in this  scenario of associating a most abstract static concept to dynamic concept?

    1} We have the static Euclidean polyhedron,

    2} we have the conceptually spun polyhedron inferring dynamic but still abstract concept,

    3} I wonder if we can say that geodesic of nature and specifically ultra-micro Gravity as example is a ultra-high frequency  ---as Fuller many times suggests--- set of vectors that each are a trajectory, irrespective of how ultra-short they may be.  Ive been on this line of thinking years ago, bring back around again, in review of how we catagorize this that or the other.

    66.4 { absolute }  minus 24.22 35 7 26 4 ( medial zero equlibrium } } = 42.17 64 27 36 { ergo 42  and top end of time dilation ergo Lorentz contraction of space.

    42.17 64 27 36 minus 24.22 35 7 26 4 = 17.95 28 54 72  ergo 18 and I take note that there exists 18 quark and 18 anti-quarks of Universe.

    Top end.....42.17 64 27 36 { 42.1 } minus 17. 95 28 54 72  = 24.22 35 7 26 4 ergo 24.2

    <<<<<<<<<--- time dilation/Lorentz contraction of space --->>>>>>>>

    24.22 35 7 26 4{ 24.2 } minus 18 = 6.29 50 25 44 { 6.3  or even 6.4 }
     
    >>>>>>>>>>> time dilation Lorentz contraction of space <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

    Bottom end.....6.29 50 25 44 { 6.3 or even 6.4 } ergo  my  low end of time dilation/Lorentz contraction space

  • zedvictor4
    zedvictor4 avatar
    Debates: 15
    Forum posts: 4,170
    3
    3
    3
    zedvictor4 avatar
    zedvictor4
    --> @ebuc
    It was April fools day.

    And I assumed you were being foolish especially as you misspelled SUDOKU.


    Not that you don't have a tendency to leave me confused anyway.

    And SODOKU is Rat bite fever.

    So SODUKU SODOKU SUDOKU were the trinity of confusion.

    Notwithstanding the possibility of multidimensional possibilities.

    How many possible 6 word variants of KUDOS are there?


  • ebuc
    ebuc avatar
    Debates: 0
    Forum posts: 1,472
    3
    2
    4
    ebuc avatar
    ebuc
    --> @zedvictor4
    How many possible 6 word variants of KUDOS are there?
    There exists no true vacuum or true equlibrium in our eternally existent, finite, occupied space Universe i.e. Universe abhors a true vacuum and true equilibrium.

    Ultra-micro, Metaphysical-3 Gravity ( G) and ultra--micro, Metaphysical-4, Dark Energy D)(E ---iconic as a bisection of torus ( <G-DE>)(<DE-G> )---, are ultra- thin surface events ----think of event horizon of black hole---, and are the ultra-high tension of Universe.

    For this reason, Ive come to believe, that, virutal particles are the ultra-high tension G-DE, being  released as ultra-micro events from outer and inner surface events  ---see (><)(><)----  of my presented tori { Great Tori as Vectors } and I now am coming to believe that is what the inversion-outversions { (><) } are from my numerically presented, spiral, helixed tori, and,

    these are the direct or associtated cconnections to our observed time, physical relity as presented in the  texticonic iconic Space(>st< ) i (>st<)Space, wherein,

    physical reality { Observed time/quantised-quantified } is the on the inside toroidal tube as,

    small s is { relative space },

    * is { biologic consciousness } and,

    t small t { relative time }, and,

    i  is  Metaphysical-1 ego/identity .

    ............Space(<G-DE>)(<DE-G>)Space......and here the arrows function as abstract pointer to outer and innner surface events of specical-case tori,

    ............Space(>s*t<) i (>s*t}Space...and here the arrows are actual inversion-outversion trajectories ---virtual particles?----  that connect too, if not create our s*t observed time reality. I'm sorry Zed, that  you able to follow this line of thought with explanation along the sides of the path 
    i've laid out clearly.

    Tho yes, overtime, my clarity of new ideas does get more refined and clearer ---if not closer to absolute truth---- as I reconsider it. Thanks for any considerate effort on you part  follow along.  Again, I was just laying in bed when I began subtracting my re-normalized Pi-Time absolute resultant, 24.22 35 7 from, the Pi-Time absolute 66.4.

    And there sat 42.0 ---later 42.1--- and I'm like that number went off like a light bulbe because of where has appeared famously.  Zed, do you know where that famous presentation of number 42 occurred?
     
    Anyway, once I started on this path, It came to me that could this help to better understand  --or simpler way of presenting--- what time dilation and Lorentz contraction of space is?

    Yes, I'm way way way out there on the most abstract fringe of what I see as, rather simple rational, logical, common sense pathways of thought, that, in this specific case,  all reference back to ratio between a 360 circle's circumference O and its diameter { two radii  (--)  }.

    Fuller did not think that transcentdental Pi is relevant to nature  cosmic coodinates becuase and infinite series never comes to a resolute { finite } conclusion.  I think Fuller was too quick to dissmis Pi as not useful to natures cosmic coordinates.

    Pi^3{ XYZ-3D } = 31.00 62 7 66.....and ever since I came across that many years ago, and,
    .......31 double is the 62......7 is appears in renormalized Pi^4 / 4 = 24.22 35 7.....adn the 4-fold Vector Equlirbrium/cubo-octahedron has symmetry of 24 edges/chords and 24 radiii when it is constructed from frour hexagonal or circular pieces of paper..

    1} the 5-fold icosahedrons 31  { left and right-skew } primary set great circles/{ tori }, and,

    2} complex animals having 31 bilateral spinal nerves, Ive been intrigued

    Pi^4 minus 31 { 5-fold XYZ resultant? } =  66.4 ergo absolute TIME via Pi ergo Pi-TIME and   again, when I took away the re-normalized 24.22 35 7... Time, and seeing 42, the rest is history recounted in this thread and another.