I have explained to you "agreeable with the bible" before.
No you haven't. You totally ignored this - - your inconsistency.. Show me the link where you addressed that particular point if you can't do that then explain it again.
My point was and remains the same - the things you say about the bible are NOT in the bible in any way that anyone else understands them.
That is all besides the point and you wouldn't know either way. You read it only once according to you. And how do you you know how "anyone understands" the bible.
Do you not know how many millions of people read the bible differently . There is a perfect example of that going on right now on this forum. One lot of Christians believe Jesus has been and gone while another lot believe he is due next week. So your argument on that score is bullshit.
It is difficult to have a discussion with you because you make out the bible is saying something entirely different to what it is saying.
That should be no concern of yours considering they YOU TELL US that you don't believe the bible or believe in god and the Jesus story is a "myth"anyway. You are being hypocritical again and inconsistent, AGAIN!
You are up a creek now because you can't discuss that which you do not believe in, don't understand, find confusing and find contradictory, and believe all to be a "myth" anyway, can you? That is where you shot all your of your fkn toes clean off , princess.
That is why you are "disagreeable" with the bible. And why it would be better if you were more agreeable.
Stop with you bullshit.
It should be of no concerns to you that I am in total opposition to what the pastors and priest have been preaching and teaching about the Jesus story and the bible.
In fact you should be agreeing with me and supporting me because I have been "proactive" and that I have "taken the bull by the horns" , or have you forgotten that that is another one of your recommended ideas for combating what you have called a "dangerous religion that is threat to our children"
#20 Timid8967
Everyone disagrees with you. Neither the Christians, nor the Muslims, nor the Jews, nor the atheists. NO ONE agrees with your disagreeableness.
You cannot know that. I know many people that do agree with me, hundreds in fact. And I wouldn't expect the devout christian to agree with with me. I didn't come onto this forum to convert anyone. I wouldn't be so stupid to even think I could. But you do don't you? How fkn stupid can one be to believe they could eradicate religion altogether.
I have come here to highlight , scrutinise and question the scriptures and you protest so much against me doing that... far to much me thinks.
I only have to read it once - and as I said - for me it is not a matter of believing the bible anymore than me having to agree with Plato or Aristotle or any particular myth.
So again, what business is it of yours how I read these scriptures that you don't believe and call "mythical"?
#16 It should be no concern of yours whatsoever, but here you are protesting that I believe and tell a slightly different story to the one "we" non believers and and "us" atheists have had rammed down our throats for over 2000 years!
If we cannot agree with what the bible says - then it is pointless having a discussion with you.
Then don't. But I know perfectly well what the bible says and I think it is a `miracle ` that you know what the bible says, a bible that YOU say you found "confusing and contradictory"
#186 and all after only one reading.!? Like I have said you complain far too much about me and what I write for my liking . You are a nine faced contradictory hypocrite.
You are someone who "knows it all"
No, just a little more than you will ever live to know.
And someone that "knows it all" doesn't continually ask questions. You are desperate to shut me up and stop talking about my own opinions theories and ideas concerning the these unreliable and ambiguous half stories that make up these scriptures. And I see that in every single fkn post you make.
You are what people refer to as "unteachable".
You really are desperate, ain't you princess?
It was put to me that I am inconsistent in my position in respect of the above question.
Yes and put to you by me, here>>>>
#154
Ahhh - So now you are bragging about yourself? How delightful.
My you really are desperate .
but no.. I am Just making it clear who it was you are referring to when you spoke of a "he" and didn't mention who. Or have you forgotten your own shite again?
here you are
->@Timid8967 wrote: It was put to me [no name] that I am inconsistent in my position in respect of the above question. And perhaps, he [no name] is correct in his assessment.
Yes,it was me . I called you inconsistent and a hypocrite on this thread here>>
#154 and yes I am correct in my assessment.