Dinosaur fossils dated at less than 40,000 years old

Author: Grugore ,

Topic's posts

Posts in total: 11
  • Grugore
    Grugore avatar
    Debates: 1
    Forum posts: 167
    0
    1
    2
    Grugore avatar
    Grugore
    Here is the truth, if you can handle it.

  • Goldtop
    Goldtop avatar
    Debates: 0
    Forum posts: 1,713
    2
    1
    2
    Goldtop avatar
    Goldtop
    Why would we be interested in what a Creationist blogger has to say?
  • Grugore
    Grugore avatar
    Debates: 1
    Forum posts: 167
    0
    1
    2
    Grugore avatar
    Grugore
    --> @Goldtop
    You don't have to listen him. But you might want to pay attention to what the the guy with the Ph.D in physics has to say, as well as looking at the test results provided by reputable testing labs. It's all in the article. Or you can remain a clueless fool. Your choice.
  • Goldtop
    Goldtop avatar
    Debates: 0
    Forum posts: 1,713
    2
    1
    2
    Goldtop avatar
    Goldtop
    the guy with the Ph.D in physics has to say, as well as looking at the test results provided by reputable testing labs
    Sorry, but I see no test results from reputable testing labs, but I did see an email from other scientists who refused to provide these creationists lab services any longer due to their stupid claims.

  • Grugore
    Grugore avatar
    Debates: 1
    Forum posts: 167
    0
    1
    2
    Grugore avatar
    Grugore
    --> @Goldtop
    Stupid claims? The labs refusing their samples are the same ones who did the original testing. The reason they refuse is because their own test results discredit their own narrative about evolution.
  • Goldtop
    Goldtop avatar
    Debates: 0
    Forum posts: 1,713
    2
    1
    2
    Goldtop avatar
    Goldtop
    --> @Grugore
    The reason they refuse is because their own test results discredit their own narrative about evolution.
    That's a lie.

  • Grugore
    Grugore avatar
    Debates: 1
    Forum posts: 167
    0
    1
    2
    Grugore avatar
    Grugore
    --> @Goldtop
    From the article you obviously didn't read...
    From 2007 through 2011 the Paleochronology group had 11 dinosaur bone samples carbon dated by the Center for Applied Isotope Studies at the University of Georgia, and for good reason.  Senior research scientist Alexander Cherkinsky specializes in the preparation of samples for Carbon-14 testing.  He directed the pretreatment and processing of the dinosaur bone samples with the Accelerator Mass Spectrometer, though he did not know the bones were from dinosaurs, and he signed the reports.  Carbon dating at this facility is certainly the very best.
    But in 2014, someone told the director of the facility, Jeff Speakman, that the Paleochronology group was showing the Carbon-14 reports on a website and YouTube and drawing the obvious conclusions.  So when he received another bone sample from the Paleochronology group, he returned it to sender and sent an email saying: "I have recently become aware of the work that you and your team have been conducting with respect to radiocarbon dating of bone.  The scientists at CAIS and I are dismayed by the claims that you and your team have made with respect to the age of the Earth and the validity of biological evolution.  Consequently, we are no longer able to provide radiocarbon services in support of your anti-scientific agenda.  I have instructed the Radiocarbon Laboratory to return your recent samples to you and to not accept any future samples for analysis."


  • Goldtop
    Goldtop avatar
    Debates: 0
    Forum posts: 1,713
    2
    1
    2
    Goldtop avatar
    Goldtop
    Jeff Speakman, that the Paleochronology group was showing the Carbon-14 reports on a website and YouTube and drawing the obvious conclusions
    No, Jeff was just being as polite as he could to the Creationist morons who were making stupid claims.

  • Grugore
    Grugore avatar
    Debates: 1
    Forum posts: 167
    0
    1
    2
    Grugore avatar
    Grugore
    --> @Goldtop
    Claims based on the scientific testing from one of the most prestigious dating labs in the world. Try again.
  • keithprosser
    keithprosser avatar
    Debates: 0
    Forum posts: 3,289
    2
    3
    3
    keithprosser avatar
    keithprosser
    --> @Goldtop
    Radiocarbon dating is excellent for specimens hundreds or a very few thousand years old, such as the Turin Shroud or Egyptian mummies.   it is no use at all for longer time scales.
  • Goldtop
    Goldtop avatar
    Debates: 0
    Forum posts: 1,713
    2
    1
    2
    Goldtop avatar
    Goldtop
    --> @Grugore
    Claims based on the scientific testing from one of the most prestigious dating labs in the world.
    That's the point, it's the claims of Creationists, hence why they were cut off after making a mockery of those tests.